Sentences with phrase «cost future money»

Though it cost Future money to hold the inventory, Rourke's offer was exclusive, so Future would get more business from him than before.

Not exact matches

Even though engaging in some of these efforts might cost you some money, they are still more valuable to you because of the future billable hours they will create.

But this most basic municipal service costs money, and will cost more in the future.

All of these promises - past and future - will cost taxpayers a great deal of money.

Even though in this example the December - 2016 futures contract is still $ 1 above the spot price, there is a profit to be had because the cost of storage plus the time value of money amounts to significantly more than the $ 1 / barrel futures premium.

A lot of money is being spent on research and acquisitions in tech stocks, but companies and analysts commonly leave these costs out, saying that these expenditures will produce more income in the future.

vermalene as get injury again in there last match and which will cost barca bcos busquet have injury) by collecting 45 / 50million for jack «s transfer, whereby d money will b use to buy another player or replacement (similar talented young future player like him) like isco, gotze, tiago alacantara, etc. the summary is that injury players are not useful to club as they are not reliable

do n`t forget that vermalene has get another injury in there last match which is goin to cost barca bcause busquet is still on injury) by collectin 40 - 50million and use d money to buy another player or replacement (talented young future player like him) like gotze, isco, alacantara, etc All of this must be done bcause injury prone players are not useful for club.chelsea and madrid sold robben bcos he was not useful to them, so why did mr WENGER keep players that are no of use to the club.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Cutting green levies on energy bills may save money now, but it will end up costing us a lot more in the future.

New York voters should force the de Blasio administration to sock away more money to cover municipal workers» future health costs, which are now more than $ 90 billion, a legislator said Monday.

«Any assurances given about our future relationship with the customs union and the single market would go to the very heart of the Brexit negotiations, revealing whether the government is intending to stay within either, or whether you intend to negotiate a patchwork of carve - outs, subsidies and sectoral arrangements, which will create winners and losers and may cost the taxpayer colossal amounts of money,» he said.

New York voters should force the de Blasio administration to sock away more money to cover municipal workers» future health costs, which are now more than $ 90 billion, Manhattan Councilman Dan Garodnick said.

Building up a debt that needs to be financed costs more money in the future.

Drew said the state would be wise to keep social programs funded, which costs money but keeps communities stable for the future.

«The industry is working together to continue cutting costs as a way to help limit future fare rises and offer better value for money for taxpayers over the longer term.»

«For many in The Bronx, and in fact across the country, the «America's College Promise» and the «American Technical Training Fund» proposals would be of great assistance for future college students saving money, especially as the cost of higher education continues to skyrocket — both at public institutions as well as private colleges and universities.

«It's always important to remember that snowstorms cost money, and the more transparent we are about those costs, the better we're able to budget in the future,» Stringer said in a statement.

«If you're holding on to a building, paying and maintaining the cost of taxes, sitting on an investment you're not profiting from, it's for a reason, and it's because you plan on making more money in the future.»

Since, as Marcus notes, «some U.S. universities and colleges may be going the way of the music and journalism industries,» scientists at early stages of their careers may wish to consider whether they ought to tie their futures to institutions that, failing drastic reform in the near future, will in many cases continue «facing skeptical customers, declining enrollment, an antiquated financial model that is hemorrhaging money, and new kinds of low - cost competition.»

With premium membership costing as little as $ 35 per month, you wouldn't mind spending some money if that ensures a secure future.

By pointing at the fat in the education system, GOP candidates could argue, as Governor Pawlenty did in 2007, that American schools are «costing us a lot of money and it's costing them their future.»

Requiring the coursework and a passing grade on a licensure test serves only to incur costs in time and money to future teachers, potentially closing the profession to some candidates.

Money saved by not decreasing class sizes may result in substantial social and educational costs in the future (Schanzenbach 2014);

These decisions may cost more now, but could save money in the future.

Proposed by Gov. James J. Blanchard and passed by lawmakers two years ago, the program allows families to invest money with the state, which guarantees that their children will receive four years» tuition at any state college or university regardless of future costs.

The normal cost is the amount of money a pension plan projects it needs to contribute now to pay benefits in future years.

Federal officials warned schools to spend the money quickly and avoid recurring costs because there wouldn't be equally large investments in the future.

The reason is that doing so will prevent the cost of current services from being passed on to future taxpayers and ensure enough money is available when retirees need it.

You can analyse costs by intervention, individual and cohort, compare value for money and budget for future years.

This not only allows Lotus to mix and match these components for future vehicles (the next Esprit perhaps), but it can save the customer money in repair costs.

All of these works are now assets which can make money for the publisher far into the future with no significant costs and no need for promotion.

And I know this might cost me some money because it's slowing down my current and future release schedule (or maybe make me more money in the long run — it's hard to say).

Third, if I ever decide the software is worth having, I'll still want to compare the total cost (in time and money) of buying it, learning how to use it and paying for future upgrades with the total cost of having someone else provide that service.

If at a future date you decided you really did want that item, you will have to re-purchase it, which isn't a big deal if it's free, but if it costs money you WILL be required to pay for the item again.

I don't want to sink $ 500 into review copies and mailing costs on the off chance that I might make that money back at some distant point in the future.

The good news for future BlackBerry 10 users is that the developer is planning to release the BB10 version under the same app ID meaning no extra purchase cost will be required when using Money Plus on BB10 - What a nice chap.

Because staying out of debt is just as important as getting out in the first place, Laura also tells you how to boost your credit score, cut costs, and save money, which will ensure you have a debt - free and happier future.

However, as money matters and family often do not mix, it is advisable to refuse such requests and find other ways to assist family in need without becoming legally obligated to pay someone else's debts, risking your own credit standing that can cost you future financing.

If you or your employer are tired of the high costs of health insurance and premiums, and would prefer to keep that money for yourself to spend as you need healthcare, or save for the future, you should look into a Health Savings Account.

The only problem with the above methodology is that it doesn't account for the time value of money - that is, the money you save on closing costs is more valuable than interest saved in future years because you can put it to work right away.

We suspect that two - thirds of this extra money will immediately be injected back into the economy through the purchase of consumer goods (Flat - Screen T.V.'s, Automobiles, iPads, etc...) The remaining one - third will probably be put into savings to help cover educational costs for future generations.»

You have to learn to cut costs, if you want to save money for a debt - free future.

529 plans are investment accounts designed to help families set aside money for future higher education costs.

Every dollar you borrow will cost more in the future, and prevent you from using that money on something you truly value.

As a commodity speculator, you could leverage the equivalent value of our country's 500 largest stocks with one futures contract, using approximately 90 % less money, and with far less in transaction costs.

In particular, the demand for money rises when: consumer spending rises, uncertainty rises, there are higher costs in buying and selling other assets, expectation of a future stronger dollar, increased demand for reserves from central banks (both foreign and domestic), and a rise in foreign demand for US goods and investments.

The money received from the VA Funding Fee is used to offset the few loans that go into default, and further reduces the cost to taxpayers, ensuring the VA Home Loan program continues for future generations.

If some of these projects are still a year or two in the future, it might seem to give a clear advantage to the HELOC, since that would be a year or two of interest you could save on the cost of those projects, as opposed to borrowing all the money up front.

Each January, we lump sum an unconscionable amount of money to pay for the obscene future projected college costs of our sweet baby angels.