Republican Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan indicated he was open to a conversation about making it easier to vote in New York, but questioned
the cost of early voting days in advance of Election Day.
Not exact matches
Collins, a moderate who
voted against the GOP's efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare
earlier this year, says the bills will offset the impact
of the loss
of the individual mandate, but experts largely disagree, arguing that the elimination
of the mandate will spike health
costs and reduce choice in plans.
When Cuomo last week proposed reforms to make
voting easier in New York state, he left something out: The
cost, and how the additional expenses
of maintaining
early -
voting sites would be covered, which worries local government officials.
Advocacy organizations have estimated
early voting and electronic poll books (which would facilitate implementation
of early voting) would
cost New York State roughly $ 7 million — compared to the State's $ 160 billion budget.
The funding could help counties that have been wary about
early voting because
of the additional
costs involved.
The estimated
cost of implementing
early voting, according to Cuomo's executive budget plan, is $ 6.4 million.
One
of the challenges posed by
early voting, he noted, is the
cost.
Faso did note
vote for the tax law itself, but nevertheless drew the governor's animus
earlier last year when he proposed a now - defunct provision that would shift the
cost of Medicaid spending from county governments to the state.
The state Legislature then will have a chance to
vote on the
cost - cutting plan under the provisions
of a new law passed as part
of the state budget
earlier this year.
In contrast, the state chapter
of the League
of Women Voters said
early voting could help improve New York's «abysmal rate
of voter turnout,» while adding that counties shouldn't bear the
cost.
I still expect Nigel Farage's party to do well in the European elections, as people take an
early opportunity to cast what they regard as a
cost - free
vote against Brussels, register their mid-term disgruntlement, and remind the Tories
of their promise.
Earlier today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D - CA) said she would support President Obama's proposed Social Security benefit cuts — even arguing that using the «chained CPI» would not be a benefit cutA after previously telling President Obama «that House Democrats will not
vote for any trims to future benefits in Medicare or Social Security, even a tweak to the
cost -
of - living index,» A according to her hometown paper.
Legislators in Colorado, Minnesota and South Dakota
earlier this year
voted to limit
cost -
of - living increases previously promised in their pension systems.
Members deliberated and passed a series
of resolutions regarding the NY SAFE Act, funding for county 9 -1-1 communications, public health article 6 reforms,
early voting, IDA reforms, Medicaid
costs, and home rule authority.
Earlier voting for the convenience
of voters sounds like one
of those mom - and - apple - pie propositions no one could oppose until someone figures out it might
cost real money.
Shame she didn't lqve
earlier, when she said the disgusting comment about Cameron trying to cash in on, nois disabled sons death, as it
cost us lots
of votes at the time,
The congressman had planned on
voting in favor
of an
earlier version
of the bill back in March after touting a provision that would shift Medicaid
costs from counties to the state, which he said would save money.
By
voting to support the LPP for at least another few years (and strengthening its sustainability by spreading the financial
cost of the program more equitably across the profession), the law society's Benchers can start a brand - new narrative:
of a governing body that's willing to show courage and vision in the face
of challenging
early returns, that won't abandon ship at the first sign
of trouble ahead.