England, for example, is rethinking wind farms because they are much more
costly than fossil fuels, and even created something they call «fuel poverty» — people who can't afford their power bills.
Not exact matches
As a result one long - standing criticism of renewable energy may no longer apply, namely that mandating increased use of renewable energy for electricity generation will be more
costly in the long run
than sticking with
fossil fuel energy.
A fast move away from cheap abundant
fossil fuels will be much
costlier than a slow one, but a slow shift means the long - lived gases will have accumulated to higher levels in the atmosphere mid-century, requiring much steeper cuts later.
Fossil fuel sources remain much less
costly than the infrastructure necessary for capturing the sun's energy.
Coal is substantially less
costly than other
fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil.
For decades the climate alarm movement has been pushing «solutions» that would handicap
fossil fuels rather
than make alternative energy more competitive — that is, cheaper without
costly subsidies.
New
fossil -
fuelled and nuclear power plants already are more
costly than older ones, mainly because they have to be compliant with higher environmental and safety standards.
Fossil fuels are already more
costly than renewable energy, and that includes coal.
These changes make the very
costly policy changes pushed by the environmental left to force substitution of wind and solar power for
fossil fuels even more ridiculous
than they already were and doom their movement sooner or later.
Since much RE now costs the same or less
than coal, oil their real cost is Zero or even profitable and far less
costly as
fossil fuel costs rise..
Witness the failure of past
fuel - tax efforts, the resistance to
fossil -
fuel - displacing wind farms in some areas, and the persistence of
costly tax entitlements like the deductibility of home mortgage interest payments from federal taxes — each, in its own way, testament to the dictum that «losers cry louder
than winners sing,» in the words of University of Michigan tax policy expert Joel Slemrod.
Perhaps he has discovered that it is much less
costly to operate
than heating and cooling with
fossil fuels and electricity?