Sentences with phrase «costs against the appellant»

Not exact matches

«The appellant maintains that, by its nature, a tax on criminal defence legal fees will, at some level, be prohibitive or at the very least act as an impediment to or will interfere with the right to counsel since the additional cost of the tax to an accused will interfere with the financial resources available to mount a defence to the charges brought against him or her,» wrote Tax Court of Canada Justice Brent Paris, summing up the firm's case.

Similarly, in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, 2016 ABCA 145 (CanLII), Justices Jack Watson, Bruce McDonald and Frederica Schutz dismissed an appeal of a professional disciplinary body's decision against the appellant, where she had been found guilty of three counts of unprofessional conduct as a chartered accountant and ordered to pay fines and costs.

A majority of the Court of Appeal (Justices Bruce McDonald and Barbara Lea Veldhuis) upheld the case management judge's decision striking the appellant's statement of claim in relation to a motor vehicle accident and issuing an order for costs against him.

Where an appeal is unsuccessful costs may be awarded against the appellant.

Costs of the appeal of $ 35,000 ordered against the appellant husband.

Costs of the appeal of $ 35,000 were awarded against the appellant husband — one of the highest costs awards for a family law appeal so far this Costs of the appeal of $ 35,000 were awarded against the appellant husband — one of the highest costs awards for a family law appeal so far this costs awards for a family law appeal so far this year.

Costs of $ 3000 ordered against the appellant wife.

Costs of $ 3000 were ordered against the appellant wife.

Costs of $ 15,000 ordered against the appellant husband.

Rule 34A (2A) provides: «If the Appeal Tribunal allows an appeal, in full or in part, it may make a costs order against the respondent specifying the respondent pay to the appellant an amount no greater than any fee paid by the appellant under a notice issued by the Lord Chancellor».

Holding: Appellants awarded costs of the underlying application fixed at $ 51,885.55 against DeJong and $ 14,017.23 against the Condos.

The appellant also appeals against that portion of the costs award that granted costs to the respondent on a substantial indemnity basis from the date of its offer to settle.

Accordingly, the appellants were entitled to their costs of the application fixed at $ 51,885.55 against DeJong and $ 14,017.23 against the Condos.

The appellant confirms that she does not have the ability to pay any costs that may be awarded against her in the event that she loses the appeal.