Not exact matches
Topics in the Q&A included the source of money for the City's planned pre-K advertising campaign, the City's target number of pre-K
applicants, whether Speaker Silver thinks the proposed income tax surcharge should be pursued next year, how the pre-K selection process will work, how the City will cover the approximately $ 40 million annual gap between the estimated
cost of pre-K and the amount provided in the state budget, when parents will learn whether their pre-K application has been accepted, how the City will collect data and measure success of the pre-K program, whether the existing pre-K application process will be changed, how the City will use money from the anticipated school bond issue, the mayor's reaction to a 2nd Circuit ruling that City may bar religious groups from renting after - hours space in public schools, the status on a proposed restaurant in Union Square, a tax break included in the state budget that provides millions of dollars to a Bronx condominium project, the «shop & frisk» meeting today between the Rev. Al Sharpton and Police Commissioner Bratton and a pending HPD case
against a Brooklyn landlord.
In 2001, Shea filed an administrative complaint
against the State Department for its disparate treatment of white
applicants under its 1990 - 92 hiring plan, complaining that he did not enter at as high a grade as he may have and that the discrimination
cost him in both advancement opportunities and earnings.
However, it is crucial to realize that the
costs involved with the LSAT discriminate
against applicants with disabilities.
This case relates to whether a solicitor acting for an
applicant can be found personally liable to pay the
costs of the respondent following the court's refusal to grant an application to issue a witness summons
against the respondent.
● It will be even more exceptional for a
costs order to be made
against a non-party where the
applicant had a cause of action
against the non-party and could have joined him as a party to the original proceedings.
Perhaps the size of the
costs against unsuccessful
applicants should be set by the judges who rule on the case...
Special
costs to successful
applicants in most cases Defendants who succeed in having the claims
against them stuck under this law should be entitled to
costs on a full indemnity basis, subject to a judge's discretion in exceptional cases where such are not warranted.
Scott Hay - Bartlem of Brisbane law firm Cooper Grace Ward says: «
Applicants have long taken comfort from Singer v Berghouse (1994), in which the High Court ruled that costs orders will not be made against unsuccessful applicants but that everyone's costs will be paid from the estate — particularly if a cost order would have a detrimental effect on an applicant's financial positi
Applicants have long taken comfort from Singer v Berghouse (1994), in which the High Court ruled that
costs orders will not be made
against unsuccessful
applicants but that everyone's costs will be paid from the estate — particularly if a cost order would have a detrimental effect on an applicant's financial positi
applicants but that everyone's
costs will be paid from the estate — particularly if a
cost order would have a detrimental effect on an
applicant's financial position.»
However, it is important to note that Justice Crighton's decision did not only follow the Alberta Rules of Court, but also relied on Alberta precedent for awarding
costs against an unsuccessful self - represented habeas corpus
applicant.
This reality, when combined with the fact that the Tribunal lacks the power to award payment of legal
costs, has meant that
applicants» victories may appear to be hollow when the time, effort,
cost and risk of pursuing a human rights application is weighed
against the resulting award of damages.
Those
against whom orders are made will not always resist an order, so will not necessarily run up a lot of
costs, but this is an important practical point for
applicants to remember, not least because it is contrary to the usual rule that a successful party can recover its
costs.
The Class Proceedings Fund, a public litigation funding entity, will indemnify successful
applicants against any adverse
costs.
Note: When an
applicant files one of these certificates under subsection (7), the court may take the kind of certificate into account in considering whether to make an order referring to parties to family dispute resolution (see section 13C) and in determining whether to award
costs against a party (see section 117).
(1) A court having jurisdiction under this Part must not, at any time, make, revive or vary a child maintenance order in relation to a child on the application of a person (the
applicant)
against, or in favour of, a person (the respondent) if an application could properly be made, at that time, by the
applicant under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the respondent to be assessed in respect of the
costs of the child, or vice versa.
Managers can fill out the JSI for a given position and then match it
against a prospective
applicant» results (the detailed report
costs $ 29.95, but the site offers volume discounts for five or more reports).
These mortgages are designed to let qualified
applicants take out a loan
against the equity in the home — loans that can be used for living expenses, home improvements, even the purchase of a primary residence if the borrower is willing to pay (in cash) the difference between the FHA HECM loan amount and the sales price and closing
costs.