Not exact matches
Within program expenses, major transfers to persons were up $ 1.1 billion, primarily due to higher old age security payments, reflecting an increase in the number
of recipients and higher inflation, as benefits are indexed to quarterly changes in the consumer price index, major transfers to other
levels of government were up $ 0.6 billion, reflecting legislative increases; while direct program expenses declined
by $ 0.2 billion, as lower «other transfer» payments more than offset increases in departmental / agency operating
costs.
datalibre.ca is a blog, inspired
by civicaccess.ca, which believes all
levels of Canadian
governments should make civic information and data accessible at no
cost in open formats to their citizens.
Any
cost to employers or
government would likely be offset
by reduced
costs through better retention
of working mothers and the greater likelihood
of their working to their education / skills
levels: Goldman Sachs have estimated an economic boost
of 13 % in Europe were gender equity achieved within the workplace.
«I would bring local control back to town
government, take advantage
of our local resources, especially our water system, fight for the taxpayer at every
level, especially state and federal, and get water and sewer projects back on track to be in the best interests
of the town, not just a
cost burden directed
by others.»
New York's state
government pension
costs could be nearly $ 1.6 billion above previously projected
levels over the next four years, according to the Mid-Year Financial Plan Update that was finally issued today — 11 days behind schedule, and nearly a week after Election Day —
by Governor Andrew Cuomo's Division
of the Budget (DOB).
He lowered state -
level rates
by merely pushing the
costs of government down to the counties and towns thru endless mandates, forcing them to raise their sales and property taxes in turn.
We are driving the
cost of government down, we are reducing the budget
by nine percent to 2008
levels, we have reduced the size
of our organization
by twenty - two percent and we are still delivering services.»
In a further setback to reducing U.S. carbon emissions, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency has proposed lowering the U.S.
government's «social
cost»
of carbon, or the estimated
cost of sea -
level rise, lower crop yields, and other climate - change related economic damages, from $ 42 per ton
by 2020 to a low
of $ 1 per ton.
Although the economic
costs for control efforts have not reached the widely - reported $ 4 billion
level predicted
by government officials in the early 1990s, control
costs of $ 120 million have been documented.
Nationwide, if only 15 percent
of residential property owners took advantage
of such programs, the emissions reductions would contribute 4 percent
of the savings needed for the U.S. to reach 1990 emissions
levels by 2020 — all at no net
cost to local, state or federal
governments because owners pay back the loans.
The
government now offers two kinds
of benefits: a dependent - care tax credit — equal to 20 to 30 percent
of expenses, depending on parents» income
level — that limits expenses to $ 2,400 for one child or $ 4,800 for two or more children; and so - called «salary reduction plans» that permit parents to have day - care
costs withheld from their salary and reimbursed
by employers without being taxed.
Some astute investors (such as Hussman and GMO) have argued in essence that the combination
of record
government deficit spending and unemployment
levels has propped up corporate revenues while lowering labor
costs, thereby boosting corporate profit margins
by as much as 70 percent above historical averages.
It is hardly surprising that such reductions in subsidies would lead to «protests» and «outrage» from the solar industry; an earlier Washington Post article
by Faiola in November 2009 took note
of the fact that even with subsidies in place, average German families had a hard time adopting solar on a household
level since they «can't afford the initial
cost, which runs between $ 8,000 to $ 20,000 even after generous
government rebates.
Despite over 50 - years
of development and
government support in Canada, nuclear power continues to be plagued
by cost overruns, technical problems, accidents and the ongoing problem
of how to manage its legacy
of high -
level nuclear waste.
This will require urgent and *** unprecedented
levels of support — the UNEP Adaptation Gap Report indicates that the global
cost of adaptation could be as much as *** $ 200 or $ 300 billion per year
by 2050 — but it is right that the rich countries responsible for the problem help to protect the culture, heritage and identity
of the most vulnerable communities and countries... Q: What should EU
governments be doing about it?
There is a major fight heating up at the State and Federal
level on how we set what the
government calls the Social Cost of Carbon, a metric calculated by the Government on the harm carbon (C02) does the economy, to our health and to t
government calls the Social
Cost of Carbon, a metric calculated
by the
Government on the harm carbon (C02) does the economy, to our health and to t
Government on the harm carbon (C02) does the economy, to our health and to the planet.
The huge scientific uncertainty about the
cost of inaction has obscured a surprisingly strong economic consensus about the economic
cost of stabilising global CO2 concentrations at the
levels currently being debated
by national
governments, that is, in the range 450 - 550 ppm.
Governments at every
level must work together to ensure there are services for all people with psychosocial disability, regardless
of their NDIS eligibility, as noted
by the Productivity Commission's NDIS
costs inquiry.