Not exact matches
Unveiled late Friday by the state Public Service Commission, a
cost analysis
of the plan projects it could
cost the state more than $ 3.6 billion
through 2030 to reach ambitious clean energy goals backed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, but reductions in
climate -
changing greenhouse gases would create benefits worth more than $ 8 billion.
But these do not affect the key point: the effects
of climate change, for example, will cause massive adjustment
costs so higher GDP may well not feed
through to higher living standards.
It's just amazing that, you know, you could capture that much information and it's interesting in the scientific perspective because what we are finding right now with issues like
climate change and conservation is that we really need fine - grained samples from very large geographic areas to really understand the dynamics
of species range movements and how fragmentation is occurring and many biogeographic questions, and literally, the only way we can do this is
through voluntary networks like this because it would
cost billions and billions to send professionals out at that finer scale to understand it.
A separate, unpublished and preliminary economic analysis carried out by the team estimates that implementing large - scale cryogenic systems into coal - fired plants would see an overall reduction in
costs to society
of 38 percent
through a sharp cut in associated health - care and
climate -
change costs.
In addition to supporting adaptation efforts
through its pipeline
of infrastructure projects (which will average $ 1.1 billion per annum over the next three years), the Bank is providing (in countries such as Morocco, Tunisia, Djibouti, and Yemen) knowledge and technical expertise for better analyzing likely impacts
of climate change, and for designing least -
cost adaptation interventions to minimize such impacts.
This is done either
through funding offers like Salix Finance, a not - for - profit company funded by the Department
of Energy and
Climate Change and the Welsh and Scottish Governments to remove the barrier
of significant upfront capital
cost to investing in energy efficient technologies.
Until the free market is made to bear the true
cost of fossil fuels, including all
of the «externalities» (e.g. degradation
of the commons including the immediate environment,
climate change, medical
costs that we all bear
through insurance premiums) there will be no economic incentive to revamp transportation energy distribution.
Some economists, scientists, and planners look at the historical record and conclude that our ingenuity will get us
through any coming
climate change, and that the immediate
cost of preventing — or at least slowing — any man - made
change is unacceptably high.
«
Through smarter, more sustainable energy systems, we can improve vulnerable infrastructure and reduce ongoing energy
costs, as well as demonstrate how we create green jobs as we respond to the realities
of sea level rise and
climate change.»
Meat and dairy generate more global greenhouse gas emissions than the entire transportation sector, yet reducing the consumption
of animal products
through institutional purchasing remains a largely untapped yet highly effective,
cost - saving approach to mitigating
climate change while promoting public health.
Initial assessments in the report show the
cost - effectiveness
of strengthening national hydro - meteorological services
through regional cooperation for reducing adverse impacts
of natural hazard - induced disasters and
climate change which know no national boundaries.
While it's hard to pin a dollar value on damages, economic models suggest
climate change already
costs hundreds
of billions in damages globally during the 20th century
through lost crops, rising seas and more extreme weather.
Alaska is home to 40 % (229
of 566)
of the federally recognized tribes in the United States.171 The small number
of jobs, high
cost of living, and rapid social
change make rural, predominantly Native, communities highly vulnerable to
climate change through impacts on traditional hunting and fishing and cultural connection to the land and sea.
The EPA spoke
of the health and other benefits
of reining in
climate change through reduced C02 emissions, while utility industry officials decry a «war on coal» that will
cost jobs and raise electric rates.
-- McConnell has repeatedly voted against Senate bills recognizing global warming, including a «sense
of the Senate» amendment expressing «the need to address global
climate change through comprehensive and
cost - effective national measures and
through the negotiation
of fair and binding international commitments.»
An unintended consequence
of climate change mitigation
through the implementation
of renewable energy is the universal increase in
cost.
As Skeptical Science has discussed, the
costs associated with
climate change impacts are calculated
through the «social
cost of carbon» (SCC), which is a very difficult value to estimate.
Abstract: An evaluation
of analyses sponsored by the predecessor to the U.K. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
of the global impacts
of climate change under various mitigation scenarios (including CO2 stabilization at 550 and 750 ppm) coupled with an examination
of the relative
costs associated with different schemes to either mitigate
climate change or reduce vulnerability to various
climate - sensitive hazards (namely, malaria, hunger, water shortage, coastal flooding, and losses
of global forests and coastal wetlands) indicates that, at least for the next few decades, risks and / or threats associated with these hazards would be lowered much more effectively and economically by reducing current and future vulnerability to those hazards rather than
through stabilization.
The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct federal agencies... to identify environmentally and
cost - effective ways to use market mechanisms and incentives... and cooperate with allies, including
through international processes, to develop technologies, market - based incentives, and other innovative approaches to address the issue
of global
climate change.»
Among the goals announced by the board are to offer local Realtors access to the online energy efficiency course provided by the NAGAB; to complete
costing and review
of the recent energy audit
of the board's 11,000 sq. ft. offices on Nanaimo Street and make recommendations for energy improvements; to build upon the provincial Ministry
of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources new LiveSmartBC program by offering information to all home sellers; and to educate local Realtors on the new technologies and programs for combating
climate change through seminars, website postings and written materials in the coming months.