In his latest book, The Third Plate, chef Dan Barber of New York's Blue Hill restaurant argues that diners must look at a new, more ethical way of eating that reflects the actual
costs of our agricultural system.
Not exact matches
This suggests that storing carbon in forests,
agricultural areas, and other ecosystems is an important and
cost - effective part
of a bigger carbon dioxide emissions control strategy that includes dramatic changes to the global energy
system.
The simple truth is that the animal - oriented
agricultural system as it has evolved over two centuries in America makes a more efficient use
of available land to provide essential, high - quality protein, with fewer surplus calories, and at a lower
cost, than any other
system that has presently been devised.
The second part presents data and results
of agricultural recovery from the tsunami — for example, monitoring
systems, reconstruction models, and convenient, low -
cost methods developed for the restoration
of tsunami - damaged paddy fields.
The campaign features a foul - mouthed organic seed who delivers a bleeped - out rant about GMO (genetically modified) seeds which have led to the nutrient decline
of 43 crops, over $ 15 billion in health
costs in 2005 alone from
agricultural pesticide exposure, and is responsible for an unsustainable food
system.
This technical document provides a brief review
of the benefits from various agriculture - based practices and technologies that have the potential to increase food production and the adaptive capacity
of the food production
system, as well as reduce emissions or enhance carbon storage in
agricultural soils and biomass, focusing in detail on empirical evidence concerning
costs and barriers to adoption, both from household and project - level data.
Reducing black carbon and tropospheric ozone, conserving and restoring ecosystems and
agricultural soils, limiting population by ensuring that everyone has access to safe water, sanitation, health and education and increasing R&D into energy
systems — are simply some
of the ways
of making
cost effective changes.
The social
cost of carbon includes, for example, changes in net
agricultural productivity and human health, property damage from increased flood risk, energy
system costs, and the value
of ecosystem services lost because
of climate change.
That's unfortunate, according to scientists at the Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh
Agricultural University in India, because using the sun's power to heat water is a far more efficient process and offers a much quicker return on investment: According to their analysis, published in the International Journal
of Global Energy, as the payback time for a solar water heating
system is about two years (with a lifespan
of 20), this is a far more
cost - effective use
of solar energy in the developing world than using it to generate electricity.
So it's easy to see the appeal
of a
system which, its proponents insist, can surpass the productivity
of existing
agricultural spaces by up to 20 times, while using less water, cutting mileage and energy
costs, and delivering food security.