Sentences with phrase «costs of the defendants»

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the trial judge who found that the defendants should pay 75 % of the claimants» costs and that the claimants should pay the costs of the defendants» counterclaim.

Then, on Feb. 12, he ordered Medtronic to pay the fees and costs of defendant BrainLAB Inc., a German company, an award estimated to total several million dollars.

A plaintiff must reasonably expect that the greater the number of defendants it brings into a lawsuit, the more likely it will be that the resulting costs of all defendants will exceed significantly the costs incurred by the plaintiff.»

Cullity J. also noted that the retainer agreement was silent as to the possible liability for the costs of the defendants if the proposed class action was unsuccessful.

The evidence of plaintiffs» counsel before Cullity J. was that the plaintiffs were advised of their potential personal liability for the costs of the defendants.

While Trans Mountain promises to pay the costs of defendants, the company does not specify what costs will be compensated.

Justice Antonio Skarica ruled yesterday that a late disclosure of crucial evidence that caused a mistrial warranted the Crown to fund the legal costs of the defendants in the case.

This figure includes the costs of the defendants (estimated by counsel for the plaintiff to be $ 54,000).

Delay and anxiety to generate # 51 more than was on the table was emphatically not worth it and so the claimant was ordered to pay the costs of the defendant starting 21 days after the date of D's offer.

The claimant was to pay 75 % of the costs of the defendants.

Not exact matches

In particular, the complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that (1) Ericsson prematurely recognized revenues and improperly delayed the recognition of costs related to services contracts; and (2) as a result of the foregoing, Ericsson materially overstated its revenues, margins, and profits during the Class Period.

The complaint alleges that throughout the class period Defendants issued materially false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (1) Ericsson prematurely recognized revenues and improperly delayed the recognition of costs related to services contracts; and (2) as a result of the foregoing, Ericsson materially overstated its revenues, margins, and profits during the Class Period.

The Harvard Business Review found, «patent trolls cost defendant firms $ 29 billion per year in direct out - of - pocket costs; in aggregate, patent litigation destroys over $ 60 billion in firm wealth each year.

Research shows that patent trolls cost defendant firms $ 29 billion per year in direct out - of - pocket costs; in aggregate, patent litigation destroys over $ 60 billion in firm wealth each year.

Christopher M. Sulyma filed a lawsuit on behalf of two proposed classes of participants in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claiming that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by investing a significant portion of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments through custom - built target - date funds.

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because there is complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendant, and the amount in controversy exceeds $ 75,000, exclusive of costs and interests.

The lawsuit claimed the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by investing a significant portion of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments through custom - built target - date funds.

Plaintiff Christopher M. Sulyma, on behalf of two proposed classes of participants in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claims that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by investing a significant portion of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments.

«The defendants,» said Mr. Comey, the head of the department's corporate fraud task force, «are accused of perpetrating a massive accounting fraud that cost public investors hundreds of millions of dollars when it collapsed.

The Enrollment Program also authorizes a superior court to have jurisdiction over enrollees by allowing it to «appoint a receiver, monitor, conservator, or other designated fiduciary or officer of the court for a defendant or the defendant's assets,» as well as authorizes the Commissioner of Business Oversight to «include in civil actions claims for ancillary relief, including restitution and disgorgement, on behalf of a person injured, as well as attorney's fees and costs, and civil penalties of up to $ 25,000» for up to four years after the purported violation occurred and «refer evidence regarding violations of the bill's provisions to the Attorney General, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the United States Department of the Treasury, or the district attorney of the county in which the violation occurred, who would be authorized, with or without this type of a reference, to institute appropriate proceedings.»

He has cut a quarter of the legal aid budget, set court and tribunal fees at unaffordable levels, and exposed claimants to eye - watering costs bills that wealthy defendants often run up.

ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Andrew Cuomo has vetoed a bill that would've required the state to pay the full cost of providing lawyers to poor criminal defendants accused of crimes.

Client care, trust in the profession, quality, investment in junior lawyers and government accountability decrease whilst miscarriages of justice, wasted costs and unfairness to acquitted defendants increase.

The suit by his lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), showed Dokpesi also praying for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants or their agents from further making any defamatory publications against him, and N50million as cost of the action.

The plaintiffs are also seeking «damages, including aggravated damages for libel contained in the defendants» publications indorsed on the writ of summons by way of an attachment and particularized in paragraphs 5 and 6 above» and «cost, including lawyer's fees».

Cuomo has vetoed a bill that would've required the state to pay the full cost of providing lawyers to poor criminal defendants accused of crimes, explaining it was flawed and called for $ 600 million worth of «unnecessary» spending.

Other reliefs Mr. Awuah - Darko is seeking includes a perpetual restraining order on the defendants from uttering and publishing any defamatory words against him and also the payment of the cost of his lawyer's fees.

He ordered the Defendants to pay the sum of forty thousand naira for cost.

In the suit by his lawyer Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), Dokpesi is also praying for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants or their agents from further making any defamatory publications against him, and N50million as cost of the action.

The Howard League campaigned against the criminal courts charge, which required defendants who were convicted of a crime to pay fees ranging from # 150 to # 1,200 towards the cost of their case.

The judge said he sought legal advice on News UK's response to his questions but before he had received the submission from independent counsel, the publisher told him «they would not be seeking the recovering of the costs that had expended in paying for the defence of the defendants».

«With its power and money, the defendants may have cynically considered this lawsuit just another cost of doing business,» Stringer said in a statement.

The initial resolution called for extending the program for another year at a local cost of $ 21,000 to be given to the District Attorney's office so a representative could appear during a defendant's arraignment proceeding.

The complaint seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, exemplary damages, forfeiture of all money received by the defendants, restitution, interest, attorneys» fees, other costs, and such other expenses or damages as the court may deem proper.»

(The Judge order that, «The defendant shall pay none of the costs associated with monitoring.»)

Written reports authorized under this paragraph may, in the sole discretion of the United States, require Settling Defendants to conduct, at their cost, an independent audit or analysis relating to any of the matters contained in this Final Judgment.

It asks the court to certify the class action, return publication rights to the three plaintiffs and other members of the class who so desire, allow plaintiffs and the class to recover damages, allow plaintiffs and the class to recover the costs of the suit, require PublishAmerica to pay restitution to the defendants and the class, and grant «further relief as may be determined to be just,» including punitive damages.

Whether or not the publishers» corporate counsel were earning their keep back in early 2010, there are certainly some serious legal costs now as all of the Defendants are being represented in federal court by some of the highest - billing law firms in the country.

Wealthy people are the most likely targets of lawsuits, and juries tend to award plaintiffs high amounts when the defendants seem to have the means to cover the exorbitant costs.

The defendants further contended that «the unions understood and accepted this bargain... Because the unions accepted this bargain, and because for most of the 17 funds at issue, fees charged to plan participants by the «retail» class were the same as the fees charged by the «institutional» class, net of the revenue sharing paid by the funds to defray the plan's recordkeeping costs, defendants argue that investment in the retail share classes was prudent.»

Defendants assert that during collective bargaining negotiations between Edison and plan participants in 1999, the parties agreed — or, at least, understood — that Edison would invest in funds with revenue sharing in order to defray some of the recordkeeping costs Edison was paying Hewitt Associates.»

«Since February 2010 (if not earlier), Defendant has provided Plan participants as their sole capital - preservation, conservative investment option the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund, initially in the higher - cost Investor class and as of October 1, 2013, in the lower - cost Institutional class.

The complaint says this pattern of failing to leverage the assets and negotiating power of the Principal CITs to demand the lowest - cost vehicle and share class was not limited to the Diversified International Fund — for eleven of the thirteen investments held by the Principal CITs, Defendants failed to use the least expensive vehicle, failed to use the least expensive share class, or both.

«Each mutual fund in the Plan charged fees far in excess of the rates Defendant could have obtained for the Plan by using these comparable products,» the complaint states, adding that the lower - cost share classes of the identical mutual funds were available to the plan many years before Philips restructured the investment lineup in 2013.

The plaintiffs allege the defendants also intentionally selected higher - fee versions of proprietary actively - managed funds to increase fee revenue, at the expense of trust participants and beneficiaries, saying they were permitted to invest in different investment vehicles which contained identical investments, but varied significantly in terms of costs.

A judgment is basically the courts determination of if the defendant owes, or does not owe the plaintiff, and may add additional accrued interest, court costs and attorney fees.

«A.K.C. is critical of proposals that attempt to permanently take dogs away from their owner - defendants who have not been found guilty of any crime,» Peterson said, «from co-owners not party to the judicial procedure, and from individuals who because of the cost of litigation may not be able to afford expensive care bonds.»

The plaintiffs seek declarations that the defendants have violated RICO by committing mail and wire fraud and that their conduct constitutes unfair, deceptive or unconscionable sales practices; damages including treble damages, costs of litigation and attorneys» fees.

Crytek has demanded «all direct damages (estimated to be in excess of $ 75,000), indirect damages, consequential damages (including lost profits), special damages, costs, fees, and expenses incurred by reason of Defendants» breach of contract and copyright infringement» as well as a cut of the profit, punitive damages, and a permanent injunction against CIG's use of CryEngine.

And so, after wasting a bunch of time with motions to dismiss the case on the basis of this mistake, Mann's lawyers filed an amended complaint, Steyn's and the other defendants» lawyers got paid even more, and the case ended up exactly where it was before, except that now the defendants are whining even more about how much the procedural stuff is costing them.