Sentences with phrase «costs on the new properties»

Not exact matches

Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry (R) World (TM); risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information;

Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.

Housing is becoming increasingly expensive to build due to government fees and regulations on building in most cities, and government programs merely subsidize this process at a cost to the taxpayers; and rent control has been a disaster because that immediately kills off any new construction and reduces the incentive for land owners and landlords to maintain their property because their income is fixed.

Essentially, the new rental income generated by the properties bought with new debt or issued shares isn't high enough (due to low cash yields on new properties) to offset the greater share count, which raises the cost of the dividend.

The Greene Turtle prides itself on having a flexible format that allows it to take advantage of more available properties, with conversions of vacated restaurants often lowering the cost and the time needed to get up and running with a new site.

«In that spirit, I am writing to you today to open a dialogue that I hope will help us work together to enact much - needed reforms on which the NFIB and the WFP now stand united: Enactment of a property tax and a spending cap, reducing state spending and our job - killing cost of doing business and fighting efforts to increase taxes even further in New York.»

Cuomo wants to freeze the growth in the STAR rebates that homeowners receive on their school taxes as a cost - cutting move in the state budget, saying New Yorkers are already getting property - tax relief through a separate rebate check program.

And whether it's property taxes in single - family homes on Long Island, Westchester or all across the city and upstate New York or it's rent regulation, which keeps the cost of rental property down... the concept is the same.»

«The property tax remains the most burdensome tax in New York and by challenging local governments to collaborate and create a plan to streamline operations for voter approval, this game - changing initiative will empower communities, cut costs, and reduce property taxes on Long Island and across New York,» Cuomo said.

[The new charge, they said, would actually be listed on county property tax bills as the «Faso - Collins federal tax» — named after New York GOP Reps. John Faso, of Columbia County, and Chris Collins, of Erie County, whose plan for the cost shifts were included in both the Senate and House versions of federal health care reform billnew charge, they said, would actually be listed on county property tax bills as the «Faso - Collins federal tax» — named after New York GOP Reps. John Faso, of Columbia County, and Chris Collins, of Erie County, whose plan for the cost shifts were included in both the Senate and House versions of federal health care reform billNew York GOP Reps. John Faso, of Columbia County, and Chris Collins, of Erie County, whose plan for the cost shifts were included in both the Senate and House versions of federal health care reform bills.]

«Property taxes remain the most burdensome tax on home - and business - owners in the Mid-Hudson Valley and across New York, and this bold initiative will empower local governments to work together to find real solutions to lower costs, cut property taxes and improve government efficiency,» CuoProperty taxes remain the most burdensome tax on home - and business - owners in the Mid-Hudson Valley and across New York, and this bold initiative will empower local governments to work together to find real solutions to lower costs, cut property taxes and improve government efficiency,» Cuoproperty taxes and improve government efficiency,» Cuomo said.

New York spent $ 21,206 per pupil compared to a national average of $ 11,392 in school year 2014 - 2015.38 Better targeting spending to the highest needs districts would contain costs while ensuring that all students have access to a sound basic education.39 The State wastes $ 1.2 billion annually on property tax rebates and allocates $ 4 billion annually on economic development spending with a sparse record of results.40 Curtailing spending in these areas would reduce pressure to increase taxes and lessen the tax differential with other states.

Cuomo and House Democrats from New York — including Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D - Cold Spring — have argued the federal government should reimburse the state for the counties» Medicaid cost share if it wants to ease the property - tax burden on county taxpayers in New York.

«We've done a lot of things on the state of new York to alleviate the burden on county property taxpayers in significantly shifting costs to the state of New York.&raqnew York to alleviate the burden on county property taxpayers in significantly shifting costs to the state of New York.&raqNew York.»

He vowed to fight for the mansion tax on residential property sales of at least $ 2 million to provide revenues for low - cost senior housing and the millionaires tax to fund subway repairs and reduced fares for low - income New Yorkers in Albany, which he called «crucial initiatives» going forward.

Teachout, on the other hand, does not support the property tax cap, which saved taxpayers $ 2.5 billion in 2015 and she advocates for a new tax on energy, which would cost residents on average of $ 1,700 a year.

«The AHCA contains a provision I authored to eliminate the ability of New York State as of 2020 to impose Medicaid costs on county property taxpayers,» said Faso.

«By reining in excessive property tax costs and building on accomplishments achieved over the past six years, our efforts to reduce wasteful spending and increase public involvement in local government with these shared services plans will lessen the tax burden for residents and ensure New York remains the greatest state in the nation.»

Mandelson is the latest senior Labour figure to criticise the party's plan to impose a tax on properties worth more than # 2m to help raise # 1.2 bn towards the # 2.5 bn costs of a new «Time to Care» NHS fund.

The New York City Council has been pushing for temporary relief for lower - and middle - class homeowners in this year's budget, calling on Mayor Bill de Blasio to fund a one - time $ 400 property tax rebate that would cost about $ 187 million in total.

ALBANY — Bill de Blasio's first trips to Albany this year were like walking into a buzz saw: First, the New York City mayor was confronted by a proposed state budget that shifted millions of dollars of costs onto his books, and then he was grilled by Republicans who wanted to impose a cap on his ability to raise property taxes.

«Jeff Klein and his fellow Senate Democrats raised taxes on New Yorkers by more than $ 14 billion dollars the last two years, cost the state tens of thousands of jobs, took away billions in property tax relief from homeowners and spent taxpayer money like drunken sailors.»

Yet another move is brewing in Albany that could cost New York City roughly $ 1 billion if approved - the proposal put forward by state legislators to impose a 2 percent property tax cap on New York City.

«They've declared war on New York,» Cuomo thundered, brushing aside any property tax reductions that would come from shifting Medicaid costs.

[Box 30] New building search, historical material, 1962 - 1972 J. T. Ratchford memos on relocation, 1981 - 1982 J. T. Ratchford memos on relocation, 1983 J. T. Ratchford memos on relocation, 1984 Potential co-locators, AASE, IEEE, 1982 Resources for the Future (RFF), relocation discussions, 1983 National Wildlife Federation (NWF), relocation discussions, 1983 Relocation, discussions with RFF and NWF on common services, 1981 discussions with RFF and NWF on common services, 1981 appraisals of RFF and NWF properties, 1983 16th Street Project with RFF and NWF 16th Street Project costs, 1983 proposed agreements and finances with RFF and NWF, 1983 Negotiations for joint venture with RFF and NWF, 1983 (3 Folders) Negotiations on joint venture, Sandra M. Burns notes, 1983 Richard D. Stout, Developer 16th Street Project, 1983 William D. Carey, memos on joint venture, 1983 Portal site, Banneker Associates, 1981 - 1982 Portal site, Banneker Associates, 1982 - 1983 Portal site, cost run - out, June 1982

Although $ 25 million is, well, $ 25 million... most of the costs associated with purchasing the Common Core compliant computers and expanding Internet Bandwidth so the new test doesn't crash the school's Internet will fall on local property taxpayers.

Risks and uncertainties include without limitation the effect of competitive and economic factors, and the Company's reaction to those factors, on consumer and business buying decisions with respect to the Company's products; continued competitive pressures in the marketplace; the ability of the Company to deliver to the marketplace and stimulate customer demand for new programs, products, and technological innovations on a timely basis; the effect that product introductions and transitions, changes in product pricing or mix, and / or increases in component costs could have on the Company's gross margin; the inventory risk associated with the Company's need to order or commit to order product components in advance of customer orders; the continued availability on acceptable terms, or at all, of certain components and services essential to the Company's business currently obtained by the Company from sole or limited sources; the effect that the Company's dependency on manufacturing and logistics services provided by third parties may have on the quality, quantity or cost of products manufactured or services rendered; risks associated with the Company's international operations; the Company's reliance on third - party intellectual property and digital content; the potential impact of a finding that the Company has infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; the Company's dependency on the performance of distributors, carriers and other resellers of the Company's products; the effect that product and service quality problems could have on the Company's sales and operating profits; the continued service and availability of key executives and employees; war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, and other circumstances that could disrupt supply, delivery, or demand of products; and unfavorable results of other legal proceedings.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, including store closings, higher - than - anticipated or increasing costs, including with respect to store closings, relocation, occupancy (including in connection with lease renewals) and labor costs, the effects of competition, the risk of insufficient access to financing to implement future business initiatives, risks associated with data privacy and information security, risks associated with Barnes & Noble's supply chain, including possible delays and disruptions and increases in shipping rates, various risks associated with the digital business, including the possible loss of customers, declines in digital content sales, risks and costs associated with ongoing efforts to rationalize the digital business and the digital business not being able to perform its obligations under the Samsung commercial agreement and the consequences thereof, the risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, the performance of Barnes & Noble's initiatives including but not limited to its new store concept and e-commerce initiatives, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, potential infringement of Barnes & Noble's intellectual property by third parties or by Barnes & Noble of the intellectual property of third parties, and other factors, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Replacement cost coverage on renters insurance means that you can buy new property to replace what suffered the loss, at retail prices, without depreciation.

You'll find that most policies offer replacement cost coverage on personal property which allows you to go purchase a new item of like kind and quality.

Since you have replacement cost coverage on your renters insurance, you'll be able to buy new property.

Dear Dheer, Since you have sold the new property within 3 years, the acquisition cost of the new house will be agreement value + expenses — LTCG on first property.

What that means to you on a practical level is that your claim will be paid at the cost to buy new personal property to replace what was lost.

Homeowners insurance premiums usually run about $ 300 to $ 500 per year, and property taxes and maintenance costs will vary, of course, depending on the size, age and condition of your new house.

If there's a theft, a fire, or another loss, you know that you can buy new property of like kind and quality with the replacement cost coverage on your policy.

Replacement cost coverage on personal property means that you'll get the amount of money you need to go out and replace the item with a new one of like kind and quality.

Generally there is a small deductible on New Jersey renters insurance, and from that deductible on, your personal property is covered at replacement cost rather than actual cash value, up to the limits of the policy you've selected.

If you have Alabama renters insurance, you simply file a claim on your own policy, get the replacement cost of your property, buy new property, and move on with your life.

Your couch might only be worth $ 50 on Craigslist, but it would cost you several hundred dollars or more to buy a new one of like kind and quality at retail, and that's the value you should use when determining how much personal property coverage you need on renters insurance.

Replacement cost means you can buy new items to replace the damaged ones rather than relying on the actual cash value of the property.

You want replacement cost coverage on personal property so that you can go out to a store and buy new property if there's a loss, and Effective Coverage has it available.

So, the deduction on this loan reduces your cost of capital to an effective APR of 4.5 %, and because it's a student loan and not a mortgage, you don't have to itemize so this is in effect a «free» deduction (even with an FHA mortgage allowing me to deduct interest, property taxes and PMI, and the residual medical costs after insurance of having our new baby, the $ 11,900 standard deduction for my wife and I was still the better deal this year).

If you put 20 % down on a new property with $ 4k in closing costs, it comes to exactly $ 26k out of pocket.

The personal property coverage on your low cost renters insurance policy, however, is generally going to include replacement cost so you can buy new property at retail to replace what was lost.

New homebuyers might not realize the effect property taxes can have on home costs.

Remember that McAllen renters insurance generally includes replacement cost coverage on personal property, so you should add up everything on that home inventory at the price it would cost you to go buy it new at retail, and of like kind and quality.

It can be hard to get good deals on insurance in New Braunfels, especially for homeowners who have to deal with the unique risks and procedures that accompany policy calculations, as well as high costs involved in getting good property coverage.

This is because if the owner later decides to turn their PPOR into an investment property they are able to withdraw the cash from the offset account and claim all of the associated interest costs on their outstanding loan as a tax deduction (because the deductibility of interest costs are capped to the lowest principal balance the loan has ever been at whilst the property was a PPOR) whilst using the cash to offset against the new PPOR mortgage which is generating non tax - deductible interest.

«However, many contacts indicated that new legislation passed by Congress could discourage homeownership, as shrinking the cap on the mortgage interest deduction for primary homes and the loss of most deductions for interest on home equity loans will increase costs for most property owners.»

However, there's an even more obvious reason for the suppressed rate of completions: Germany's one of the few countries where second - hand property prices have traded (on a medium / long term basis) at a major discount to new construction costs.