I wonder if this sentence
counts as a prediction Hansen got wrong.
Not exact matches
In Chicago, the Park District will use a new high - tech system that uses computer software to give real - time
predictions of bacteria
counts based on such factors
as water temperature, modeling of the lake bottom and wave action monitored by buoys.
No - one is claiming that «
prediction» of the cooling
counts as a major success for the models, since it was hindcast, not predicted.
However, since neither of those three actresses has a real lock hold on this final slot, this category is actually pretty ripe for an upset — my guess could be an Alicia Vikander changing course on The Danish Girl and entering herself
as a lead here to nab a double nomination — and if that happens, I reserve the right to
count it
as a correct
prediction since it was impossible to plan for.
While a poor history
counts against you, so does having little credit history
as it makes
predictions less certain.
The numbers don't lie,
as Sesame Street's
Count never said, and the most recent
predictions — from analysts, who I may have just said are half - ignorant — have the Switch shifting just shy of 17 million units around its first birthday.
The only problem with all the
predictions about the level of the World Ocean rising is that, the World Ocean is refusing to rise up in support of the
predictions, the other problem is that ice is frozen fresh water and frozen fresh water only covers about 5 % of this planet above sea level and frozen water under the level of the World Ocean does not
count as the World Ocean will fall a small amount if that ice melts, so if the ice there is enough to get the World Ocean to rise and significant amount then it must be piled up very high, I cubic kilometer of water
as ice, should it melt, would make 1000 square kilometers rise by one meter, so when you use this simple math then somewhere on the planet, above the level of the sea, then there must be over 500,000 cubic kilometers of ice, piled up and just waiting to melt, strange that no one can find that amount of ice, all these morons who talk about the rise of the World Ocean in tens of meters, this includes you Peter Garrett or Mr. 7 Meters, the ice does not exist to allow this amount of rise in the World Ocean, it is just not there.
I
count it
as zero because of Ferenc Miskolczi and because of the failed
predictions from IPCC.
JimD I appreciate this point Its seems like failure of the models does
count just
as matter of scientific debate (especially since the
predictions called for extreme changes) but I hear what you're saying and will consider your point
as I gradually learn more about this issue well stated, even though it lacked bold typeface for emphasis:)
The latest finding
counts as an alarm signal rather than a
prediction.
I don't think the verification or otherwise of 15 year old
predictions should be
counted as a major argument in favour (at the same time, I don't think that the skeptics assertions that past GCMs have been hopelessly wrong are worth anything).
A confirmed
prediction counts as very strong evidence in science.
Latest data from NOAA's Storm
Prediction Center indicate that
as of today, the total
count for 2016 of US tornadoes are fewest in a calendar year since record - keeping began in 1954.