Sentences with phrase «count on appreciation»

I wouldn't count on appreciation because from the chatter around we might already be at peak and due for correction.

I don't believe that you can count on appreciation unless it's forced so I wouldn't buy and cross my fingers that the rents and value of the home went up.

Some argue that you can't count on appreciation, so you have to ignore it.

In general, if you're keeping the property, don't count on appreciation as a way to make money.

Can't count on appreciation here in Texas.

When supply and demand are driven by factors far beyond our control — like unscrupulous bankers and asleep - at - the - switch ratings agencies — I am not sure that counting on appreciation is the wisest course.

From 2008 on, disillusioned investors that had been counting on appreciation to right all their fundamental investing wrongs received a pretty harsh punishment from a market that had been pushed passed it's inflation limit.

I'm not counting on appreciation, but if I had to speculate, I'd say these will be at $ 150 - $ 160 in another 8 months.

Not exact matches

I only «count on'the cash on cash return and then any appreciation when the property sells is «gravy» to cover the overall risk... similar to you, I assume between 8 - 10 %, even though most of the projected IRR's are around 14 - 16 + %.

The 2003 Plan currently limits the number of options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted to any individual during a fiscal year to 15,000,000 shares, and it limits the number of stock grants and restricted stock units that may be granted to any individual during a fiscal year to 5,000,000 shares (counting the shares on a 1 - for - 1 basis for this purpose).

I count myself among the original movie's fans, though not as voraciously as some (to put my appreciation into context, I'd rank it about on par with Pixar's second worst movie).

As a result of such high valuation, this blue - chip Dividend Aristocrat underperformed the S&P 500 on both counts — capital appreciation and dividend income.

To complete its sweep of outperformance versus the S&P 500, 3M outperformed on both counts — capital appreciation and dividend income since the beginning of 2012.

Over the long term since the beginning of 1996, 3M (MMM) outperformed the S&P 500 on both counts - capital appreciation and dividend income.

Since the beginning of 2007, 3M once again outperforms the S&P 500 on both counts — capital appreciation and dividend income.

Going back to the beginning of 1996 Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), perhaps the most popular dividend growth stock of all, outperformed the S&P 500 on both counts — income and capital appreciation.

I earn about 10 % on mine (in income alone, not counting appreciation).

Since the beginning of 2002, 3M once again outperformed the S&P 500 on both counts — capital appreciation and dividend income.

On a stock appreciation basis, 2011 (which lost 0.003 % but gained 2.11 % on a total return basis), and 1994 (which lost 1.54 % and gained 1.32 % on total return basis) couldn't be counted; meaning the count would be 35 of 47, or 74.5 On a stock appreciation basis, 2011 (which lost 0.003 % but gained 2.11 % on a total return basis), and 1994 (which lost 1.54 % and gained 1.32 % on total return basis) couldn't be counted; meaning the count would be 35 of 47, or 74.5 on a total return basis), and 1994 (which lost 1.54 % and gained 1.32 % on total return basis) couldn't be counted; meaning the count would be 35 of 47, or 74.5 on total return basis) couldn't be counted; meaning the count would be 35 of 47, or 74.5 %.

I've known a couple of people who claimed that their rental income just barely covered their expenses and that they were counting on price appreciation to make it worthwhile to be a landlord.

I've heard @Brandon Turner mention in one of the BP Podcast that buying a rental should be based on cash flow and the appreciation, if any, is a bonus but shouldn't be counted on.

But counting on, hoping for, predicting appreciation beyond the built in appreciation you created on the buy is what most investors call speculation.

I've actually come to the point where I use a small negative rate for appreciation, because I don't want to count on the supposed 1.5 % increase for my area.

But be very careful counting on any specific appreciation rates as part of your wealth building plan.

The bottom line is that buy to let investors who are counting both on return from rental income and value appreciation should be careful in terms of the extent of the borrowing that will use to acquire a property.

As home prices rise, investors will no longer be able to count on substantial future price appreciation, and their return on investment will drop; meanwhile, sturdier consumer finances will make buying a home more attractive than renting.

The biggest problem with both areas is that the price is so high that we can not find any rental property with positive cash flow; you can only count on price appreciation.

If you can handle the negatives from a cash flow perspective, and it helps you to reduce your taxable basis from other incomes ($ $ $ benefit), and you are counting on long - term appreciation, I feel this is still a strong strategy.

Counting on future appreciation and / or deliberately losing money to supposedly «save» on Tax should be seen for what it is: Gambling!

He is counting on someone seeing the appreciation possibility once the area is improved.