There are also
counter arguments like this one which, rather conveniently, mentions Kindle Vs iPhone --
Not exact matches
Churches and pastors who participate in miracles and prophecies don't
like to be told that they are being controlled by the devil, and so they often
counter with the
argument that anyone who says that something is of the devil when it is actually from God is committing a blasphemous sin against the Holy Spirit and will never be forgiven of such a sin.
You said «your pointless
arguments and
counter arguments will always revolve around the fact that God exists just
like the earth you are destined to circle around the Sun round and round and round that is your destiny.»
your pointless
arguments and
counter arguments will always revolve around the fact that God exists just
like the earth you are destined to circle around the Sun round and round and round that is your destiny.
Jeremy i am surprised you never
countered my
argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues
like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
And yes, I know that someone will list a bunch of «atheist» leaders
like Stalin or Mao here, as if that
counters the
argument an any way.
For the record, some countries (
like the former Soviet Union) did perform abortions very frequently because there weren't other effective forms of birth control.Some conservatives that I speak with
counter my
argument about birth control by suggesting that everyone needs to be responsible for the cost, education and hassle of this themselves.
I'd
like to debate this so please reply if you have
counter points to my
arguments.
The model also
counters another
argument against oceans: that the proposed shorelines are very irregular, varying in height by as much as a kilometer, when they should be level,
like shorelines on Earth.
OK, and my
counter argument is going to be squeezing your junk
like that creep from the Shamwow.
The
argument often used to
counter the power of educators is that public education needs to be run more
like a business and be more efficient.
This example is one of many
counters to the industry's
arguments that borrowers are knowingly choosing to pay for services they can get for free, just
like tax preparation.
Anyway, I can
counter «companies
like money»
argument in a far more simplistic manner without a long winded paragraph..
Companies
like to claim that ever pirated version of their game is a sale lost, while the
counter argument is that the majority of pirates would never have bought the damn thing anyway and that they'd buy it if prices were more reasonable.
Companies
like to claim that ever pirated version of their game is a sale lost, while the
counter argument is that the majority -LSB-...]
I would
like to
counter that
argument.
As incautious as such
arguments (
like Boris Jonson's) are, they are nothing compared to the absurdities of the
argument they are
countering.
When you explain, for example, that Energy Star is voluntary, they usually
counter with the
argument that [whatever they don't
like] is just the first step in a vast left - wing conspiracy... Change is hard.
This seems
like an
argument for a large white area in IF1, as opposed to being
counter evidence.
Like a true narcissistic bunch of trolls they answer
counter arguments as if they were aggressive attacks.
Lee has an opinion, you might not agree or
like it, but it's hard to argue its unethical per se if it neglects to present all sides or deconstructs
counter arguments, it could simply be viewed as weaker by some.
== > «Lee has an opinion, you might not agree or
like it, but it's hard to argue its unethical per se if it neglects to present all sides or deconstructs
counter arguments,»
How about the «database as real evidence»
argument (so not documentary evidence, so not hearsay — so don't even need the business records exception... it's all just mechanically recorded,
like the
counter in a turnstile as evidence of the number of people who entered an auditorium)?
The jump to 16 - megapixels on the front camera feels
like something of an oddity, as the
argument for increasing the pixels while shrinking the size seems to run
counter to the logic applied to the rear camera.
Instead, it feels
like your set reading is every book ever written and then a book outlining a
counter argument for every
argument you have already encountered.
We may
like to jump right into
countering their point with ours, but staying patient actually makes your
argument better once it's time to deliver it.