And if we had scored first it would have been a very different affair, with Welbeck's pace and our creative ability on
the counter attack coming in to play rather than having to batter against the Chelsea bus.
You can only realize that when
a counter attack comes from an opposition team.
Not exact matches
@ Robin VanPayslip what if we try it and it works wonders... Our squad would certainly be well utilized with it, we will get more
counter attack goals
coming in — Right now our
counters fall in the way side and we would have 3 guys — not two to meet the opponents
counters... and at least two or three players in every spot in the field...
Our big chances will
come from
counter attack and set pieces.
For example, against Pullis type teams we may want Ramsey who will make the penetrating late runs into the box against a team that sits back and defends, we may want to start with Ramsey against a team like Chelsea to get the 1st goal but then Coquelin
coming on to sit and defend while relying on long passes from Xhaka and the threat from our tank Seo and Bellerin / Ox... More
counter attacking.
We defended and
counter attacked in the first leg and
came out victorious.
But even when so - called bigger teams
come to our place, they have been happy to sit behind the ball, soak up pressure and hit you on the
counter attack and that sort of surprised me.
We are away from home and a draw suits us so let them
come at us and we can pick them off on the break, with the same front 4 we can be deadly on the
counter attack.
- walcott is only good to
come on when the opposing team is about to start
attacking us (when we are a few goals up) for his pace on the
counter - having gabriel replace BFG makes arsenal compress the play and play better close intricate passes and take opposing teams apart (he is a welcomed addition)
We continue to try to pass through opponents playing for an idea of great Barcelona-esque football, when we don't have the players for it and our best successes
come when we play
counter attacking football.
When one analyzes the 4 games in which the team conceded three or more goals, a number of factors
come into play:
attacking players losing balls in our defensive third,
attacking players not committing fouls when they lose the ball to stop
counters,
attacking players not tracking back to defend, and
attacking players lacking a defensive mindset..
Most of their goals are
coming from
counter attacks and quick reactions.
Nebraska may have
come to Norman with the best rushing
attack in the nation (395.6 yards a game), but the Sooners
countered that with a scorched - earth defense that had yielded only 65.2 yards a game on the ground.
I knew Sundays result before we played and if you look at the team Wenger has no tactics if you are going play subs why 5/10 mins before the end it seems he is always looking for excuses and Miracles not playing basic football protect you lead and if they
come at you you can
counter attack.
But we also lose out when it
comes to
counter attacks and finishing, especially in tight games.
«When Ramires
came on we killed their
counter attack and had complete control of the game.
The game was won, but Liverpool were starting to build momentum, so Danny
came on instead of Theo (everyone here can agree that his defensive work rate is better and he still is fast enough to force Liverpool to drop a few steps deeper and beware a
counter attack).
Last season Lei started with
attacking football, but they always concede first, sometimes they had to
come from 2goals down to draw like 5/6 games in a row... But later, they saw the weakness and played on the
counter...
Both goals
came off
counter attacks because our back 4 were left unprotected with arteta (our «defensive / holding mid) caught up field.
How do you know Stoke will
come for a point?teams
come to win games nowadays with a simple game plan of defend deep and
counter attack at The Emirates!
Marian Pahars's Latvia looked lethal on the
counter attack and had few qualms with letting the home side
come on to them before launching forward on the break.
Some may point to the fact that Chelsea only had 3 but if you assess the situation, Chelsea were never going to
come out guns blazing at Arsenal, Chelsea thrive on controlling the game and
counter attacks, having a free flowing game of
attacking football is in Arsenal's best interest not Chelsea's and as such they would do everything to break up the play, seek for one off opportunities to get a goal and or get goals from set pieces and it worked like a charm against us.
At least if this did nt work, Ox or Walcott could have
come on as a
counter attacking outlet.
2) Invitation to
attack us — Arsenal football philosophy had quietly shifted and now we were inviting opponents to
come and
attack us as they would see we were not operating in full
attack gears and it was easy for them to get into our defending side of the pitch much quicker as they
countered lesser bodies on the way.
I understand what you're saying bounty hunter, but I feel like the week prior to big games should be enough time to at least tweak our formation slightly or employ a certain tactic, whether it's
counter attack with less possession or playing with two strikers up top instead of the lone striker, I would hope that players at the level required for arsenal would be able to adjust to this as it seems I tend to hear other teams
coming away from big wins uttering phrases like «we worked on the manager's ideas this week and executed them well», I cant remember our players saying this for a while.
Ramseys improvement
came from simplifying his game.jack needs to follow suit he holds on to the ball too much and attracts the foul in att mid pos this can be a good thing if we have a set piece finisher, but when playing cm it leaves us open for the
counter attack.
3 from 4 goals were the opposition's faults and only Walkott's first
came from a nice
counter attack which would have not happened if we weren't already 2 - 0 up.
And when it
comes to
counter attacks, don't single out Ozil either.
The last 2 years he should have not
come off the pitch for anyone unless we are playing strictly
counter attack football, which is maybe 5 % of the time.
Most of the goals we concede from
counter attacks over the past couple seasons, Gibbs is out of position for a lot of them and he doesn't
come back most of the time or is to slow to recover.
Their best
attacks came from
counters where our defense (koscielny) screwed up.
Iwobi has shown he has both and is the same age as alex when he
came, unless alex can improve his decision making he won't fit into our style of play (which I concede is useless atm and outdated) but he could do really well for a
counter attacking team I think.
case 2 jurgen klopp he was always up on the touchline animated (he is a joy to watch just on his own without the team) talking to his players and encouraging them to keep chasing the ball down, and
counter attack and he wasn't scared to make changes to the shape or tactics through out the game to gain advantage, where he could clued up manager (what wenger was once upon a time) he is the future of football management, take your bow klopp you earned it last night can only hope when the time
comes we can convince to take us to the future of modern football.
And I have no freaking idea if this is the players or managers but every single one of Wenger's sides post invincibles have been absolutely suicidal when it
comes to defending
counter attacks!
Do nt get carried away gooners Arsene Wenger did create the Invincibles, he does know what hes doing so teaching an old dog new tricks has nothing to do with it, but im gonna say he never had the money or right players for this type of
counter attacking football and times even in fabregas era we saw flashes of brilliance that Arsenal have based that around the philosiphy of the club and maybe just maybe its finially
coming to fruition and every player / coach has bought into it.
Walcott will
come on soon and reinforce our
counter attack so chill the hell out people.
why do we never look at the opposition and assess where the threat
comes from and set up accordingly, stoke plays deep with direct balls to creative players, liverpool plays high press
counter attacking football why arent we more fluid based on the team we face?
Özil can feed the fast guys Sanchez — Cambell — Welbeck with his brilliant passing skills and the fast lads have pace to
come back and defend as well while Özil and Welbeck can stay up that they can start a fast and furios
counter attack, «cause Özil can hold the ball and wait that Sanchez & Cambell and Rambo can join as fast as they can and Willshere stays behind if we lose the ball.
how often do we get
counter attacks against us when Sanchez loses ball in mid field????
Come on and sign lemar ffs.
Watford
came here to play
counter attack with 2 defensive midfielder Arsenal managed to lose.
Our opener
came on the
counter attack and 12 minutes later we had two more but we should take fair warning from their performance that day.
With the form giroud is in and the fact that most of our
attacks will
come from
counters today it would be better if he was just left in london and no where near the starting XI.
It keeps
coming up that Arsenal are a possession team whilst Vardy done well in a
counter attack side.
The game suddenly
came alive in the last five minutes of the first half, with a lacklustre Arsenal corner eventually going out for a Gunners throw, which was also disappointing, and we were then hit on the
counter attack.
Ramsey has the qualities needed for the modern box to box were as wilshere doesn't really he is ok over a short distance with a short burst but beyond that he is quite static in the middle, but is excellent technically and can play a quick pass when he is on form use him as a springboard to launch
counter attacks from any new manager that
comes in will either help him improve or he will be a casualty of the new regime, unfortunately that reality of life in football i hope for one both of them stay and help us win trophies in years to
come COYG
We've all seen him thrive with Leicester's
counter attacking football and you expect him to want to
come walk the ball in the net with us?
One minute some of you guys are all about «how ruthless AW should get» and «we need to play more quick
counter /
attacking football» or «We need to get rid of injury prone deadwood» and «it's going to get tougher with the new managers
coming into certain teams».
Guys i think i deserve some credit for being a good analyst.Like i had earlier warned Fulham wont be easy unless we resort to
counter attacking football.And i again said Walcott must be the main man in such a system.This
came to pass with aplomb.Walcott man of the match for me.
Let me hope Flamini will manage to do a Fellaini kind of thing.But if we play our game based on
counter attacks like we did to spurs then we are as good as any one for top three.But if our injured players
come back early especially Diaby, Frimpong, Podolski, Chamberlain and Walcott stays fit then we are contenders for the trophy.
There was one particular
counter attacking oppurtunity where Giroud
came from the front to kick the ball to the defenders when Walcott was about reaching the ball running at full speed forwards.