Sentences with phrase «counter evidence»

There is plenty of counter evidence in the data.
There is plenty of counter evidence in the data.
This looks like counter evidence against (3), not uncertainty.
You will notice in the article that he writes «The plaintiffs counter with a 45 - page brief...» The plaintiffs never counter... it is the defense that counters the evidence presented by the plaintiffs which is what I did.
Those who do not think Jesus existed are frequently militant in their views and remarkably adept at countering evidence that to the rest of the civilized world seems compelling and even unanswerable.
To be sure, a serious Luther scholar will wish to say a bit more about the function of the pro me in Luther's theology and will point out some complicating counter evidence.
Later, I presume, the architect will be called to counter the evidence offered by Ana's best friend and prosecution witness, Kate (Eloise Mumford), who will testify about all the times (including some we see here) when Ana was terrified about defying her husband's orders, such as to stay home and socialize with no one.
This category name is often mistakenly seen as synonymous with «lots of graphic sex scenes,» but these two books provide solid counter evidence to this claim, as neither book contains any consensual sex at all between so - called «new adults.»)
However, counter evidence existed to show that western gray whales were extant.
In remembering Carter the world should not forget his positive contribution... nor should we forget his negative ones, and what the background was to his misplaced commentary in the face of strong countering evidence.
What is systematically omitted from the SPM are precisely the uncertainties and positive counter evidence that might negate the human interference theory.
The silver bullet that disposes of the AGW hypothesis might still be out there and on its way, but I suspect that the only really effective countering evidence will be provided by the passage of time.
That means countering the evidence and arguments of the defense.
Now, you wish to present as counter evidence that less than 0.2 % of people in the US with a scientific qualification of any sort disagree.
A major objective of the 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) was to counter the evidence in Figure 7c from the 1990 First Assessment Report (FAR)(Figure 3).
I take issue with (1) people not being allowed to question consensus and (2) miss - representation or omission of counter evidence.
However, researchers have worked hard to provide counter evidence to this disparagement.
I don't think you know what that fallacy actually is, here is the definition: Special pleading, also known as stacking the deck, ignoring the counter evidence, slanting, and one - sided as sessment, [1] is a form of spurious argument where a position in a dispute introduces favourable details or excludes unfavourable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations.
Those who develop the counter evidence, showing that the subjective and objective worlds interact, have to do their research on their own time and don't get to teach about it, at least as a part of «science.»
Great, then, as is the menace to Christianity and strong as seems the evidence that the Christian tide is displaying a major recession, the counter evidence is by no means negligible.
Counter evidence: Are the effects less harmful when parents are less educated?
Any counter evidence?
Evidence would seem to suggest that they have explained a good deal — in order to counter this evidence, you must run to amateurs who do not work in their field and willfully ignore the evidence presented by the experts.
Stop bleating and support your hypothesis, it's looking fairly fragile from my viewpoint and perhaps you should rethink, formulate another Ha, given the counter evidence of recent years.
No, it is not PROOF of AGW, but it does provide scientific analytical evidence to respond to your post and the posts of others who claim that there is only circular logic without any counter evidence being presented here.
I don't know what you mean by «liking» to leave the ocean out and I don't know what kind of evidence you would consider to be counter evidence to your claim.
In principle each candidate could be explored, including the evidence and counter evidence, arguments and counter arguments, etc..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z