There is not much to
counter that claim given the language of the article.
Not exact matches
Q.: Theologian James Sellers has
countered this
claim by arguing further that «needs» also include a need for community interaction, which in turn requires
giving and sharing as well as getting.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you
claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands
given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a
counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Even if the message is reaching 50 % of people who already have their kids on a regular vax schedule it's not penetrating the echo chambers of the anti-vaxers and it's not
giving the pro-vaxers the information they need to
counter the
claims of their friends and acquaintances who might be anti-vax.
A year later, the Home Office
countered with the
claim that the TV tests were invalid because the scientists had not been
given quite the same recipe used by Skuse.
They have a
counter that
claims 8 - 10000 online at any
given time, and.
So Appiah, trying to make his readers understand an African practice they will find abhorrent, rehearses the arguments those who practice female genital cutting will
give to
counter criticism, but then continues: «I am not endorsing these
claims.
[Response: The tired
claim that «weather isn't predictable therefore climate can't be» is quite well
countered by satire as in the link we
gave.
That was lolwot's
claim and is not unreasonable
given the
claim it is
countering.