Not exact matches
Industrialized
countries would be bound to meet their
emissions reductions, while developing
countries would be required to audit and report their domestic
actions every two years.
The discussions, they said, should culminate with the adoption of more ambitious economywide
emission reduction targets by developed
countries and mitigation
action plans from developing
countries at the next major U.N. climate conference slated for Doha, Qatar, in November.
Industrialized
countries like the United States will report on the progress of their
emission reduction commitments, while developing
countries will report on their mitigation
actions — a slight distinction, but an important one.
The
actions aim at a 10 %
reduction in carbon
emissions from fishery value chains in 10 target
countries within 5 years (and 25 % within 10 years), and the
reduction of overfishing by 20 % in the target
countries within 5 years (50 % within 10 years).
With all these
actions, the U.S. should do what it can to leverage its efforts into
emissions reductions by other
countries, particularly China and India.
Along with expanded state and local climate policies, these
actions can put the
country on a pathway to
emissions reductions of 80 percent or more.
All -LCB- developed
country Parties -RCB--LCB- all Annex I Parties and all current European Union (EU) member States, EU candidate
countries and potential candidate
countries that are not included in Annex I to the Convention -RCB--LCB- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member
countries,
countries that are not OECD members but whose economic development stages are equivalent to those of the OECD members, and
countries that voluntarily wish to be treated as developed
countries -RCB--LCB- shall -RCB--LCB- should -RCB- adopt legally binding mitigation commitments or
actions including economy - wide quantified
emission limitation and
reduction objectives16 for the period from -LCB- 1990 -RCB--LCB- 2013 -RCB--LCB- XXXX -RCB- until -LCB- 2017 -RCB--LCB- 2020 -RCB--LCB- XXXX -RCB-, while ensuring comparability of efforts among them, taking into account differences in their national circumstances.
Even ignoring for a moment the injustice of asking all developing
countries to «contribute» exclusively via
emissions reductions, such
action could only ever be undertaken if the money, technology, and capacity was there to do so.
In order to achieve target
emissions levels,
countries had two options: either take
actions to reduce their own domestic
emissions, or pay someone else to reduce their
emissions and thus offset the
country's domestic
emissions with
reductions somewhere else.
Countries later submitted
emissions reductions pledges or mitigation
action pledges.
• characterize national
emissions • explore alternative
emission reduction scenarios • calculate
country - level health, agriculture and global climate benefits • compare results across alternative scenarios • inform nationally appropriate
action on SLCPs
What does that mean: There is a group of
countries, mainly rich
countries, who should be taking on clear binding commitments through
reductions; and, (the others, the) non-Annex-I
countries should be taking strong
action but with no strong binding commitments on
emissions.
It is this spirit that has seen
countries like Germany achieve a 59 % renewable energy peak last month, President Obama start to turn the tide on previous US inaction by launching a new Climate
Action Plan that includes action to begin the phase down of coal power, and China's statement last week that it intends to usher in stronger emissions reductions in its next Five Year Plan, due in
Action Plan that includes
action to begin the phase down of coal power, and China's statement last week that it intends to usher in stronger emissions reductions in its next Five Year Plan, due in
action to begin the phase down of coal power, and China's statement last week that it intends to usher in stronger
emissions reductions in its next Five Year Plan, due in 2015.
This paper analyses «fair and adequate»
emission reduction ranges for 2025, 2030 and 2050 for Brazil, India and South Africa, largest economies and a set of African
countries (part of MAPS — Mitigation
Action Plans and Scenarios Programme).
-- The report required under paragraph (1) shall also identify opportunities and recommendations, including
action under existing authorities, to achieve significant black carbon
emission reductions in foreign
countries through technical assistance or other approaches to --
«For the purposes of decreasing the likelihood of catastrophic climate change, preserving tropical forests, building capacity to generate offset credits, and facilitating international
action on global warming, the Administrator shall set aside the percentage specified in section 781 of the quantity of
emission allowances established under section 721 (a) for each year, to be used to achieve a
reduction of greenhouse gas
emissions from deforestation in developing
countries in accordance with part E.
• Approaches that account for the global dimensions of achieving and maintaining sustainable levels of atmospheric CO2 and encourage cooperative
action by all
countries, including the U.S. and large emitting nations in the developing world, to implement CO2
emission reduction strategies.
Climate Interactive, on the other hand, assesses multiple scenarios, one in which there is no post-2030
action and several in which there is continued
emissions reductions in certain
countries to varying extents.
«There is enough basis to assert that
emission reduction and compensatory financing constitute human rights obligations, and that lack of remedial
action by responsible
countries would amount to a violation of human rights,» he added.
The Cancun agreements call on developing
countries planning to undertake such efforts to develop: a national strategy or
action plan; a national forest or forest
emission reference level; and a transparent national system for monitoring and reporting of conservation and
emission -
reduction efforts.
All G20
countries have taken
action over the past year to advance their
emissions -
reduction goals, and there's strong potential for some to go even further.
Plan of
action - CO2
emissions tax, deregulate low polluting technology and remove current barriers of new technology per usual pick and choose government interference, facilitate standards to coordinate national and international energy development, subsidize ultra low polluting power generators and fuel to poor
countries, investment dollars awarded to highest rate of return for CO2
emission reduction upon global market, rate tax expenditures and promising technology by independent accounting agency bonded to ensure loss of political and personal cronyism influence.
Without such rules, comparing
emission reduction actions taken by different
countries will be like comparing apples and oranges.
presented the chart to both Jackson and Secretary Chu, which shows that meaningful
emissions reductions can not occur without aggressive
action by China, India, and other developing
countries.
«Carbon leakage is defined as the increase in CO2
emissions outside the
countries taking domestic mitigation
action divided by the
reduction in the
emissions of these
countries.»
It appears that in spite of any
actions by the US or the EU that increases in
emissions over the next 30 years in
countries currently with very low levels of
emissions but high populations will overwhelm the likely
reductions by the US / EU.
In this context both sides believe that, while striving for final legal agreement, an agreed outcome at Copenhagen should, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, include
emission reduction targets of developed
countries and nationally appropriate mitigation
actions of developing
countries.
In February, the Australian government's Climate Change Authority analysed the
action of other
countries and recommended that, to stay consistent with the Cancun commitment, Australia's target should now be
emission reductions of 19 % by 2020 and 40 - 60 % by 2030, relative to 2000.
Under the deal, all
countries are expected to announce by 31 March
emissions reductions targets and other
actions to fight climate change.
Ditching the Bali
Action Plan in favour of something new would simply be a way for A1 countries to be let off the hook while appearing to be committed to emission reduction a
Action Plan in favour of something new would simply be a way for A1
countries to be let off the hook while appearing to be committed to
emission reduction actionaction.
Individual
countries don't have to provide standardized information on
emissions reductions, which makes it difficult to determine if
countries are living up to their pledges and if collective global
action is enough to give us a chance of staying below a 2 degrees Celsius temperature rise.
-- A package of details on how to monitor, report and verify
emissions reductions by developed
countries and climate protection
actions taken by poorer ones, or MRV in UN jargon.
First, the national pledges of
action that
countries — northern and southern, large and small — have committed to deliver to the UN Secretariat, the pledges in which they lay out their
emission -
reduction action plans, have to get a whole lot easier to read and compare and interpret.
These words ring so hollow and dubious especially as developed
countries are abandoning their mitigation obligations under the Kyoto Protocol or the ad - hoc working group on Long Term Cooperative
Action (LCA) and or are offering no meaningful and ambitious
emissions reductions in the elusive second committment period of Kyoto.
(05/23/2012) Indonesia's moratorium on new forest concessions will not be enough to meet its 2020
emissions reduction target says the largest backer of the
country's forest and climate
action plan.