Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 provides a mechanism in certain circumstances for a claim to be brought in
this country against a spouse or former spouse even if financial provision has already been made by a foreign court.
Not exact matches
This issue arises when a woman with healthcare through her or her
spouse's employer (which is how most of us get healthcare in this
country) has an employer who is
against contraception and does not want any employees to have access to contraception.
The English courts do not open their doors to just anyone who wishes to take advantage of our divorce laws, but rather requires
spouses to demonstrate a real connection to this
country, and are constantly on guard
against «forum shopping».
Although this novel approach in Darby had no impact on the husband so long as he remained in Costa Rica, if a similar order were made
against a
spouse who resided within Canada and held assets in a foreign jurisdiction, it could prove to be a powerful tool in ensuring that the other
spouse received their fair portion of any matrimonial assets held outside of the
country.
A
spouse may also request a temporary injunction
against the other party's conduct during a pending divorce — for example, a parent may want to prevent the other
spouse from taking the child to another state or out of the
country.