«After winning the Colossal Fossil award — given to
the country doing the most damage to climate talks in a given year — five years in a row, Canada is in a league of its own for its total lack of credibility on climate action,» said Christian Holz, Executive Director of Climate Action Network Canada.
Not exact matches
The real reason
most people in this
country are turning away from organized religion is that they see the
damage it
does everyday in the world.
Even though alcoholism ranks as one of the
country's three major health problems, along with cancer and heart disease; even though it accounts for approximately 98,000 deaths every year; even though it is the root cause of
most pastoral - care crises (suicides, auto fatalities, child abuse, divorces, hospital admissions, accidental deaths and home violence); even though it costs the nation $ 120 billion annually in terms of lost work time, health and welfare benefits, property
damage, medical expenses, insurance and lost wages; and even though its effects impair the educational process of every child in every classroom, still the church acts as though alcoholism
does not exist.
You atheists have
done the
most damage to our
country and Christians are repairing your
damage as we type.
And Cuomo is fighting for the endorsement — but the legendarily brass - knuckles governor's new move is going further, and attempting to
do deep
damage to a party that has become one of the
most powerful progressive institutions in the
country.
«
Most people in this
country do drink safely and responsibly but the evidence of the
damage that is caused by those who don't is plain to see; alcohol abuse still costs us # 20 billion a year in crime and
damage to health.»
While the bill isn't all that we had hoped for, it
does eliminate some of the
most damaging components of the previous law's high - states testing and accountability regime and gets rid of the School Improvement Grants program, whose school closure, chartering and reconstitution requirements have destabilized Black and Brown communities across the
country.
While the new law isn't all we hoped for, it
does eliminate some of the
most damaging components of the previous law's high - states testing and accountability regime and gets rid of the School Improvement Grants program, whose school closures, chartering and reconstitution requirements have destabilized communities of color across the
country.
It should also continue to stand in solidarity with the
most vulnerable
countries and peoples, ensuring concrete steps for finance for adaptation and loss and
damage are taken, and that concrete climate measures
do not undermine their livelihoods and rights.
Global warming is now threatening a number of
countries, yet those
most responsible double down on the
damage and deny that they are
doing it.
- Without compensation for irreparable
damage, the
most vulnerable
countries will be left to pick up the pieces and foot the bill for a crisis they didn't create.
• Assure that those responsible for climate change provide adequate, predictable adaptation funding to enable developing
countries and in particular the
most vulnerable developing
countries to
do what is necessary to avoid climate change
damages in cases where it is possible to take action and to prevent
damages, or be compensated for climate change
damages in cases where it is impossible to take protective action.
Yet questions of distributive justice about which nations should bear the major responsibility for
most GHG reductions at the international level have and continue to block agreement in international climate negotiations, as well as questions about which
countries should be financially responsible for adaptation costs and
damages in poor
countries that are
most vulnerable to climate change's harshest climate impacts and who have
done little to cause the problem.
If the United States is a very large emitter of gigs compared to
most other nations in terms of historical and per capita emissions, why doesn't the United States have an ethical duty to fund reasonable climate change adaptation measures in and losses and
damages of poor developing
countries that have
done little or nothing to cause human - induced warming.
Developed
countries are historically the biggest emitters and are
most responsible for the
damage done by climate change.
The source of contention in all of these cases is that a number of third
countries and seal hunters are not too happy with the EU's decision to
damage their economic interests for reasons of protecting the health and life of animals not situated within the territory of the EU (granted, Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, but
most EU law
does not apply there, see article 198 - 204, 355 TFEU and Annex II of the Lisbon Treaty).