Labour, on the other hand, says Cameron's response is typical of his character, and that he was unable to win the support of
the country for military action against Assad because he failed to listen to the opinions of others.
Not exact matches
But at least
for the one record --(and it's closer to 4 billion / year from the States to Israel's
military alone — saying nothing about all the other aid given to that
country)-- if even a small portion of that amount were given from this file towards refugee settlement needs it could make such a humanitarian
action possible.
It is often considered more legitimate
for a
country to take
military action against another
country that is authorized a UN Security Council resolution than it is to do so without that authority, and it is considered more legitimate
for a
country to take
action against a
country whose
actions have been condemned by the UN Security Council (without an actual authorization to take
military force) than it is to do so without such a determination.
Militarily Ukraine is also in a very weak position, with a conscript army that could itself fragment into Ukrainian and Russian components if pushed into
military action, and a command echelon that seems to be prepared (given the sacking of the army chiefs by both Yanukovych and the new acting president Turchynov) to prefer caution and neutrality rather than be an instrument
for splitting the
country any further than it already is.
In recent conflict of Russia and Ukraine some of G8
countries as sanction of Russian
military actions in Ukraine declared they will stop preparation
for G8 event in Sochi.
Tory grandee Ken Clarke said: «On the question of the parliamentary role, I think the Prime Minister was not relying on the archaic, narrow interpretation of the Royal prerogative, which no government has invoked in this
country for over 50 years - they have always come to Parliament
for debates and votes if possible on any
military action.
Britain has launched airstrikes in Syria, hours after MPs backed David Cameron's plan
for military action in the war - torn
country.
«Furthermore, the timing of this fictional and imaginary report is to halt or frustrate the sale of Tucano jets to Nigeria, at a time the Nigerian Government has reached advanced stages in
actions over the contract with the United States Government
for the purchase of 10 Tucano jets to assist the
military battle terrorism in the
country.
For instance if it was North Korea, or Syria then you can expect that the military will punish the entire country for the actions of its governme
For instance if it was North Korea, or Syria then you can expect that the
military will punish the entire
country for the actions of its governme
for the
actions of its government.
She chaired the all - party parliamentary group
for Friends of Syria, and was vocal in making the case
for military action in the
country last autumn, on humanitarian grounds.
Others appreciate the commitment and dedication of soldiers serving
for their
country; yet others share the ideals and aims behind the need
for military action to begin with.
Next up
for OR Books is Norman Finkelstein's book on «Israel's Growing Isolation After the Gaza Invasion,» set
for January, in which he «looks at how the reckless and disproportionate
military action against the Palestinians in Gaza a year ago has led some of Israel's closest allies to question their support
for the
country,» while «offering the possibility of something hopeful emerging from the tragedy of what occurred in Gaza.»
Three of the dogs received the Croix de Guerre, one of Frances» highest
military honours,
for their
actions in combat and all were awarded a life of leisure at the end of the war
for their service to their adopted
country.
I suppose it partly depends on whether trump alienates other
countries but if he doesn't whyWould they kick a trading, political, economic amd
military giant that may be roaring back into
action after being asleep
for eight years?
> I suppose it partly depends on whether trump alienates other
countries but if he doesn't why Would they kick a trading, political, economic amd
military giant that may be roaring back into
action after being asleep
for eight years?
Courts are utterly unqualified to determine proper diplomatic or
military actions to take, or to evaluate whether the President's
actions were enough to meet the requirement of «do what's necessary to restore security;» foreign policy is a case where a
country needs a unified face (because other
countries aren't particularly willing to deal with US internal politics), and where the courts could easily screw up what the government is doing; and whether to send Americans to war is a question that is clearly a matter
for those accountable to the people.