Sentences with phrase «couple is in love»

This is not to say that the couple is in love with each other.

When participants read the scenario in an abstract frame of mind, they were more likely to think that the couple was in love and would wind up in a long - term relationship.

Not exact matches

The Upper East Side couple, married for over a decade, will soon be featured in their own Bravo reality series (the cable network has had great success with its LA - based love - connection show «The Millionaire Matchmaker»).

I've worked in business journalism for a couple of decades, but Inc. has been by far the job I've loved most.

From their many businesses to reality TV spin - off, «Vanderpump Rules,» the couple, who married in 1982, have proved time and time again how much they love one another, whether that be taking care of Todd when he was sick or turning their restaurant, SUR, into an incredibly popular nightclub.

This Georgia island holds a special meaning for the couple as it's where they met (and presumably fell in love) while filming «The Last Song.»

As for couples who are saving more throughout the rest of the year, keep in mind that after falling love often comes getting married, buying a home and having a baby, which is the most expensive time in your life, von Tobel cautioned.

What it's about: A musical about a couple of teens falling in love over summer break and then learning they go to the same high school.

The result is this 270 - page formal letter, called an apostolic exhortation, addressed to bishops, priests, married couples, and lay people about «love in the family.»

Public Interest Advocacy Centre director John Lawford, who is sitting in on a couple of panels, is perhaps the lone voice of the public — Wind Mobile's two representatives could maybe be included — in what is otherwise an industry love - in.

Some of the more paranoid or lawsuit - fearing companies in the U.S. require office couples to sign a wavier or «love contract,» vowing that their relationship is consensual and neither will take legal action against their employer (or each other) should the love prove less than eternal.

But how can those of us who love life fight against in - vitro fertilization clinics when those clinics give infertile couples (and those who have great difficulty getting pregnant) the joy of being able to have children?

If the couple wants to talk about their sexual topics, be it hetero or homo, they will do that, and they must be treated with real, humble love and compassion, and not with brimstones and fire, and not making scapegoats out of them in front of the congregation.

So the lesbian couple who left sex far behind them aren't in sin even though they're in a long term committed love relationship and the two elderly gentlemen who no longer have sex are also not in sin, and yet these are homosexual relationships between people who choose to share their lives.

Many people are unaware of the Loving couple's story but this epic portrayal of love and racism in the 20th century is part of U.S. history.

It was easy to recognize, in the words of this latest exhortation to more faithfully follow the gospel in the economic and global - political realm, the voice of our dear shepherd» to see the sharp intellectual and moral challenge of his mind, coupled with the loving understanding of his heart, so passionate to bring Christ to the world and the world to Christ.

How gay marriage does fit in to all of this I don't understand.I might understand it if you thought that people are gender based in their capability to love and care.And I would understand if you would think that a married couple should not be of the same sex..

Riddled with anti-truth, anti-science, the inquisition, burning people at the stake, condemning loving couples, cant eat this or that... these people only know one thing and that's control in the name of an immutable source whom they claim to have a monopoly.

When a couple engages in physical love, they go out of themselves in a trajectory of ecstasy — to a place where they are no longer in control of themselves.

To God's freely constituted, pure conceptual valuations there is coupled, as it were in another dimension, his free emotional response, his love for individuals.

I am a white woman that attended a church with mostly white couples, but I would have loved having you and your husband in my church.

I love people and had started making a couple of friends and was so excited to be in the house of God.

That's a couple of things we can agree on in principle Sabio, some nailing down could do with lightening up and there are those who love their pathology.

That's why there are 1000's of gay churches and gay clergy because no where in your bible does your god condemn the saved loving respectful relationship of a gay couple.

This is one of the reasons why artificialcontraception has had such damage upon marriages and relationships: the couple deliberately withhold their fertility and so no longer give themselves completely to each other; in doing this they deny not just the meaning of sex itself but they also subtract from loving one of its «givens» - the orientation towards giving oneself completely to one's spouse.

Will they deny that Christ - imitating, self - sacrificing love is indeed present in many same - sex relationship and continue to advocate against ensuring gay couples can visit one another in the hospital?

She told People magazine, «It didn't really kick in until a couple hours after, I just thought I was signing a piece of paper to go play the sport I love again.

Isn't it the better part of wisdom to have the advantage of arranging a marriage with the help of the people who love you most - your family - in an effort to harmonize and complement the qualities backgrounds, and value systems of the couple - to - be?

There were outward differences among the couples on the floor — different races, different gender combinations, etc. — but the central message of the moment was that the «sameness» is in the love — hence the song, «Same Love.&ralove — hence the song, «Same Love.&raLove.»

There would be certain consequences that come with the act of procreation, namely, a deeper union between the couple: «spiritual and sacramental love, joy of possession, and the fulfilment of human, complementary vocation in one flesh, all taken up to God», [5] as well as a natural organic pleasure such as accompanies the proper functioning of other humanacts (like eating and drinking).

For example, if a couple wash the dishes together in the kitchen this issomething that they do with their bodies, it is something that can «make» love between them, but it can only do so because the principle that is eliciting the love is spiritual not bodily.

I've only heard of very wealthy couples who married because they were in love.

In our community, we're trying to do both — to support singles and married couples, to support gay and lesbian folks too, so that they find a community where they feel loved.

The implication of identifying these two realities is that it suggests that sex in itself is the cause of love being «made» or deepened between a couple, and this is something that Holloway directly takes issue with.

A couple of years ago I was invited to a small community in Nova Scotia, Canada that I fell in love with.

As young couples «in love» know intuitively (but married couples often forget), appreciation is the language of love because it is the food for nurturing self - esteem.

The kind of love which is the glory and wonder of a marriage — growing love — represents an integration of all the facets of intimacy which the couple has cultivated in their relationship.

The only one doing that is you Bob, you're the one that is in denial that no where in the bible does your god condemn the saved loving respectful relationship of a gay couple.

Many other modern interpreters of marriage have made the same mistake, and so have many people in American churches, who are tempted to join with Coontz and insist that couples get married for reasons of love alone, Economic, kinship and network issues and even the desire to have children are sometimes seen as contaminations of the purity of marital love.

After reading a couple of your blog postings on homeless, I have attempted to be more open to loving on the homeless in a way that would best represent Jesus which is a big step for me because I would normally be the person looking the other way assuming they were drunk or drugged.

This extreme self - sacrificial interpretation of neighbor love has often been coupled with those passages in Ephesians, Colossians and I Peter that seem to advise women to submit to the spiritual authority of their husbands.

Thus love is life affirming and healthy, intimacy flows from it which elevates the individual in the freedom to love as well as bonds the couple in that mutual exchange of giving and receiving their deepest selves, one to another.

However, with a couple of exceptions, no one was interested in discussing loving gays except to tell gay people they're sinners.

Any couple who loves one another deserves to be able to marry and the USA isn't Sodom and Gomorrah, it's the country I'm proud to live in and who my family has defended for years.

Jesus prayed that the church «may be one» just as He is in the Father (John 17: 21), and this goes for a relationship as well — it is essential a couple be united by their love for God.

But what I love about the whole thing over the last couple of years is he's behaved in a very dignified way.

The couple successful in accomplishing this developmental task is usually one who keep their love for each other central in their family life.

If the basic art of loving mutuality was learned during the young adult years, most couples take the middle - years crisis in their stride.

But we don't know — the negative possibility for this couple's affair, and of its misery being drawn out for far too long due to his believing too much in his love, is also there.

I was in Tokyo and Kamakura a couple of years ago and I loved it — it was fantastic.