Thatâ $ ™ s not jargon; these are essential elements of a syllabus in any basic
course on climatology.
My background was University Entrance exams in the 60s at school however I went for the inhouse qualifications of the Forest Service which included a lot on silviculture, geology, botany and even a short
course on climatology.
Not exact matches
«
Climatology» is apparently (as Thomas shows us @ 166) also used as the title for an ANU
course on AGW.
No amount of commentary in the source code will satisfy those who want it to stand
on its own without further explanation; that is, no amount of commentary short of a full
course in
climatology.
Current requirements for that degree show that he would have taken exactly one chemistry
course and NO biology /
climatology / environmental science
courses, which leaves him markedly unqualified to postulate
on «climate change», particularly the idea that «climate change» is caused by the activities of human beings.
In this way I've benefited from
courses on global climate change,
climatology, future energy supply and demand, the physics of the greenhouse effect and planetary radiation balance, and climate politics and policy options.