Sentences with phrase «court accepted an appeal»

Last Friday, the high court accepted an appeal by a Texas woman whose daughter allegedly was involved in a sexual relationship with one of her high school teachers.

''» [U] nless the U.S. Supreme Court accepts an appeal of the case, SSI's royalty suit against Disney will proceed in the new year... For those of you who, like myself, spend time watching Pooh videos with little people, you can now use that time to think through these fascinating copyright issues...»

Not exact matches

The Supreme Court only accepts around 1 % of all appeals, and typically does so when there's a pressing legal question or a significant split between appeals courts.

Weeks later, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the IRS could not penalize two Christian schools — Dordt College in Iowa and Cornerstone University in Michigan — for refusing to accept the mandate.

The controversial ruling was appealed and accepted for review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

As a Supreme Court Justice might go behind years of accepted legal precedents to appeal to the intentions of the framers of the U.S. Constitution, so Jesus went behind the teaching of Deuteronomy to the intent of God as recorded in Genesis.

«The Constitutional Court, if it accepts the appeal, will examine whether the amendment contravenes the provisions of the Russian Constitution.»

The High Court unanimously allowed the appeals, concluding that the «decision in Barbaro does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and a court is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.&rCourt unanimously allowed the appeals, concluding that the «decision in Barbaro does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and a court is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.&rcourt is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.»

My case was widely reported because it was the first time that the British Court of Appeal had accepted that British relocation law relegated the harm done to children.

Gov. David Paterson said his administration will not appeal US District Court Judge Lawrence Kahn's decision granting a preliminary injunction to block his furlough plan, and said he will again ask public employee unions to accept a pay lag instead of moving straight to layoffs.

The Commission on Judicial Nomination, the screening committee for filling posts on the state Court of Appeals, announced it would accept applications through May 19.

«We will not accept the charade going on in Obosi, and our party will take a stand soon about the entire election, and anything outside that, you know it will end up in the tribunal, appeal court, and Supreme Court», Ngige court, and Supreme Court», Ngige Court», Ngige said.

The Court of Appeals has accepted a determination by the Commission on Judicial Conduct that Alan Simon, a judge in Ramapo, Spring Valley and Hillburn, should be removed from the bench for violations of judicial ethics.

The Supreme Court refused to take an appeal on that specific case regarding the North Carolina laws, so one can accurately say that this particular finding is the accepted law of the land, approved to the highest levels of our judiciary.

«Rather than wasting more public on the appeal, they should accept the court's judgement that this was discriminatory.

On March 22, the Court of Appeals accepted the apportionment as drafted, [13] thus becoming the law, without the need of legislative approval.

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that an independent conservative group supporting Republican Joe Lhota for New York City Mayor can accept unlimited donations because New York State's limit on donations to independent political committees is likely unconstitutional, as the New York Times reports.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Silver's conviction for accepting nearly $ 4 million in bribes in exchange for his political power.

Refusing to accept the court's findings, Li appeals to the chief justice, the county chief, and even the mayor, but fails at every turn.

The court accepted a case from Texas, where a federal appeals court ruling that prohibited organized student prayers has caused turmoil at games this fall.

Even the weak statement from the New York Court of Appeals that new accountability should accompany added funding was met with indifference by the judicial referees, who accepted the thrust of Mayor Bloomberg's testimony when he appeared before them: he is already accountable through the electoral system, so just send the money.

In fact, Miller v. Skumanick (eventually Miller v. Mitchell in the appeals court) got even more interesting because the prosecutor told the dozen students caught up in the affair, that he would not prosecute them if they accepted school suspension, submitted to drug tests, wrote an essay about their infractions, and attended a five - week re-education program in which they would admit that what they did was wrong and — for the girls — had learned what it meant to be a girl in today's society.

The appeals court accepted this argument even though the Supreme Court had acknowledged similar circumstances in 1983 (Mueller v. Allen) when it upheld a Minnesota program that gave a tax deduction to parents for tuition and other education expecourt accepted this argument even though the Supreme Court had acknowledged similar circumstances in 1983 (Mueller v. Allen) when it upheld a Minnesota program that gave a tax deduction to parents for tuition and other education expeCourt had acknowledged similar circumstances in 1983 (Mueller v. Allen) when it upheld a Minnesota program that gave a tax deduction to parents for tuition and other education expenses.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week accepted two appeals dealing with employment issues that could hold important implications for school districts.

In a move of potential significance to public schools nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last week accepted an appeal involving the right of individuals to sue when government entities fail to protect them from violence by private citizens.

The lower court has to issue its ruling, and then the inevitable appeal will be made by the losing party, and the Supreme Court will almost - inevitably accept the appeal and go through its own procourt has to issue its ruling, and then the inevitable appeal will be made by the losing party, and the Supreme Court will almost - inevitably accept the appeal and go through its own proCourt will almost - inevitably accept the appeal and go through its own process.

The registrar responsible for the roll refused to accept her application, and the appeal from that refusal came to the Federal Court of Australia, with both Getup and the individual would - be elector as parties along with the Electoral Commissioner.

Who knows what Judge Sharon Keller, presiding judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals was thinking when she wouldn't keep the court house doors open for twenty more minutes to accept a filing by a death row inmate's (Michael Richard) attorneys, seeking a stay of execution based on an decision earlier that day by the Supreme Court to review a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injecCourt of Criminal Appeals was thinking when she wouldn't keep the court house doors open for twenty more minutes to accept a filing by a death row inmate's (Michael Richard) attorneys, seeking a stay of execution based on an decision earlier that day by the Supreme Court to review a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injeccourt house doors open for twenty more minutes to accept a filing by a death row inmate's (Michael Richard) attorneys, seeking a stay of execution based on an decision earlier that day by the Supreme Court to review a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injecCourt to review a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injection.

Thus although the Court of Appeal in Hasan was willing to accept that the «categories of cases in which reasons are required are not closed», it was not willing to depart from the status quo.

In relation to the second ground of appeal, the court accepted that there is a principle of proportionality in the doctrine (for example minor motoring offences by the claimant would not negate the claim), but theft was on any view far too serious to be applied here.

The Court of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office fCourt of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office fcourt in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office first.

RCFP had filed an amicus brief on behalf of itself and 29 news organizations urging the court to accept the appeal.

However, the General Court accepted Gifi's argument that the Board failed to examine all the evidence it had produced, and the Board's judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

The new evidence should have been accepted by the Ontario Court of Appeal because it raised the very real possibility that a young person had been tried and convicted by a court that had no jurisdiction as a result of hisCourt of Appeal because it raised the very real possibility that a young person had been tried and convicted by a court that had no jurisdiction as a result of hiscourt that had no jurisdiction as a result of his age.

We also are retained by trial counsel to assist their clients and will accept cases directly from clients seeking to appeal a lower court ruling.

The BC Court of Appeal overturned the arbitrator's decision and accepted the employer's arguments that if there is individualized testing, there can not be discrimination.

The facts accepted by the learned trial Judge and confirmed by the Court of Appeal was that the Appellant bathed the deceased with an acid having laid ambush for him.

As noted in the Court of Appeal Case in Solomon v Cromwell Group PLC Oliver v Doughty (2011): «The effect of accepting a Part 36 Offer made before a claim is issued, is that the Claimant is entitled to recover costs incurred in contemplation of proceedings ``

Essentially, the Court of Appeal recognized that Reeb would be better off accepting the plaintiff's settlement offer under the $ 1 million limit of his mother's home owner's policy, than continuing to pursue the application to determine if there was any coverage in excess of the limit, under the two additional insurance policies.

The Court of Appeal accepted that rather than taking a rigid approach the trial judge noted the legal duty on the other driver, despite being the dominant driver was to «avail herself of any sufficient opportunity to avoid an accident if she was aware, or should have been aware, of the servient driver's own disregard of the law».

The Chancellor gave the ruling of the Court of Appeal and accepted the administrators» contentions.

The Court of Appeal accepted the need for fairness when revisiting Simmons v Castle in October -LRB-[2012] EWCA Civ 1288; [2012] All ER (D) 90).

The court appointed Bradenton attorney Greg Hagopian to accept the case, but Hagopian is appealing, arguing that a compulsory appointment in the case would financially ruin his practice.

The difficulty with that argument was, as the appeal judge accepted, virtually all appellate judges and many High Court judges are not at the aforesaid face.

[2] The parties accept the conclusion of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Parker (2000), 2000 CanLII 5762 (ON CA), 146 C.C.C. (3d) 193, that a blanket prohibition on medical access to marihuana infringes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Supreme Court, in dismissing the appellant's appeal against a finding that the local authority's housing duty to her had been discharged, held that the reviewing officer had been entitled to find that there was no medical evidence that a property of its type would have the consequence that the appellant's mental health would be so affected by it as to make it reasonable for her to refuse to accept it in all the circumstances of the case.

The Court of Appeal accepted that the judge was entitled to conclude that it was a normal characteristic for the horse to rear up in the particular circumstances of the case because it was «natural» for horses to do so in certain circumstances from time to time, even if such behaviour was not «usual».

This was the argument which the British Columbia Court of Appeal accepted.

Of course, for the purposes of determining Edwards, the Court of Appeal had accepted the factual assumption that «if the proceedings had been carried out in accordance with his contract of employment... he would not have been dismissed.»