Sentences with phrase «court against banks»

Litigators rarely win swaps mis - selling claims in court against banks because of the «supremacy of contract in English law», according to Simon Duncan, solicitor at Moon Beever, in this week's NLJ.

If a judgment is obtained in an English Court against the Bank how is it enforced?

After the bank withdrew its unlawful detainer lawsuit, the tenant filed a lawsuit in federal court against the bank for its alleged PTFA violation, but the court dismissed the case on the grounds that unlawful detainer cases such as this one are properly addressed in state court.

Not exact matches

Abramovich was in Fribourg court as part of a lawsuit brought by the London - based European Bank for Reconstruction and Development against Abramovich, Russian oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler, and the Russian energy company Gazprom Neft, a bank spokesman said WednesBank for Reconstruction and Development against Abramovich, Russian oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler, and the Russian energy company Gazprom Neft, a bank spokesman said Wednesbank spokesman said Wednesday.

Malik this week also filed an arbitration claim against the bank with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), and he separately plans to file a discrimination complaint against the company in New York state court, according to the report.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigCourt of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigcourt on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive harm.

The following documentation and statements were presented in Reg Howe's lawsuit filed in the District Court of Massachusetts against Defendants: Bank for International Settlements, Alan Greenspan, William J. McDonough, J.P. Morgan & Co..

He successfully argued against forum non conveniens dismissal, obtaining the first ruling after the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) to permit foreign investors pursuing foreign law claims to seek recovery for losses on a foreign stock exchange in a U.S. cCourt's decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) to permit foreign investors pursuing foreign law claims to seek recovery for losses on a foreign stock exchange in a U.S. courtcourt.

The exchange filed a lawsuit against ten banks in the country's anti-monopoly court.

A PEF council leader in Rockland County, Deborah J. Lee was found in 2013 to have misused a union - issued bank card, making numerous personal purchases, which led to a court judgment of $ 64,105 against her.

Investigations by the Nigeria Police following a petition by the Bank in September 2013 also found Innoson and Chief Innocent Chukwuma culpable of the criminal allegations levied against them by the Bank, and Chief Innocent Chukwuma was accordingly charged to court by the Police.

A court ordered on Thursday 6 January that all bank accounts of the former legislator be frozen until investigations into alleged financial malfeasance levelled against him were over.

A ruling by a state Supreme Court justice against Credit Suisse may strengthen Schneiderman's hand in punishing other banks in the future over liability for the financial crisis.

The allegations by Kent and the others center on what the plaintiffs claim was an unfair attack on them by Spence and his allies regarding charges that a Rockland County council leader, Stephanie Lee, had misused a PEF bank card, making numerous personal purchases, which led to a court judgment of $ 64,104.88 against her.

ICPC in a 49 - count charge preferred against him and a former Chief Accountant of IAR & T, Mr. Zaccheaus Tejumola, told the court that the duo opened an unauthorized bank account titled «the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training Ibadan Staff Club and Cooperative Account» into which they transferred N204, 926, 265.35 from the personnel emolument (salaries) account of the Institute.

Also, in the appeal filed by Skye Bank against Tuns International Holdings Ltd and Tuns Properties Ltd, dated May 8, 2015, Justice Mohammed Danjuma of the Court of Appeal held that the Appeal lacks merit and is «hereby dismissed.»

Despite the perilous odds stacked against them in vaccine court, the evidence of a vaccine / autism link is so strong that vaccine court judges and government agencies have now recognized at least two theories of how vaccines cause autism: the Vaccine - to - ADEM - to - ASD link in Bailey Banks» case, and vaccine - induced aggravation of an underlying mitochondrial dysfunction that caused full - blown autism in the Hannah Poling case.

According to the court filing against founder Richard Tate and CEO Ryan Tate, «A review of bank records shows that monies derived from the sale of publishing or music production services were deposited into business checking accounts and then transferred to Ryan Tate and Christy Tate and / or Richard Tate and Rita Tate's personal checking accounts... Bank records also show that the $ 50 processing fee checks from authors, made payable to Tate Publishing, were deposited directly into both Tate Publishing checking accounts and the personal bank account of Richard and Rita Tbank records shows that monies derived from the sale of publishing or music production services were deposited into business checking accounts and then transferred to Ryan Tate and Christy Tate and / or Richard Tate and Rita Tate's personal checking accounts... Bank records also show that the $ 50 processing fee checks from authors, made payable to Tate Publishing, were deposited directly into both Tate Publishing checking accounts and the personal bank account of Richard and Rita TBank records also show that the $ 50 processing fee checks from authors, made payable to Tate Publishing, were deposited directly into both Tate Publishing checking accounts and the personal bank account of Richard and Rita Tbank account of Richard and Rita Tate.

A US federal court has ruled against Amazon in its case with the FTC over youngsters breaking the bank with in - app purchases.

Even if you're not criminally charged with fraud, you can still be incarcerated in some states if the bank gets a judgment against you in civil court.

If you don't show up in court or you do appear but lose your case, the creditor wins a judgment against you to garnish your wages or bank account.

If the court finds the debt is legally enforceable, the debt collection agency could garnish a portion of your wages, seize bank accounts or record liens against your real property, such as your house.

If you don't show up to court or you lose your case, the creditor automatically wins a judgment against you to garnish your wages or bank account.

For a private student loan to garnish someone, they must first sue you in court, get a judgment, then execute the garnishment (usually against a bank account or your paycheck).

WASHINGTON (Reuters)- A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the New York attorney general's office can investigate whether national banks discriminated against minorities seeking mortgages.

Wall Street's main lobbying arm has hired a top Supreme Court litigator to study a possible legal battle against a bank tax proposed by the Obama administration, on the theory that it would be unconstitutional, according to three industry executives -LSB-...]

So for a personal loan, credit / store card or bank account where there's been no contact for six or more years a lender usually can't get a court action against you.

The lender or bank may also take you to court and obtain a judgment against you.

A lawsuit against the bank regarding student loan discrimination will proceed to court.

Meanwhile, the Sierra Club and WWF America lobbies against energy development in Africa, an American foundation with ties to Hilary Clinton funds serial, frivolous legal actions against an Indian power company in Australian courts and the World Bank is in a «race against time to stop construction of new coal - fired power plants across the globe».

However, the court also noted there can be exceptions, such as governments, banks, or other large organizations that regularly appear in the courts and likely have a more tolerant attitude towards law firms they retain on unrelated matters acting against them.

My summary of the case is: A trial judge — he wasn't named in the Court of Appeal but his name can easily be discovered — had dismissed plaintiff's claim against the defendant bank and a solicitor for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.

Representative Trial Experience: • Rosa Construction, Inc. v. Capstone Builders, Inc. et al. v. Sterling Savings Bank, Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court (2013): Five day jury trial resulting in the permanent discharge of Capstone's improper construction lien against Rosa's real property, affirming the priority of Sterling Savings Bank's mortgage on Rosa's real property, and awarding $ 1,425,000 in compensatory damages against Capstone for recording an improper lien on Rosa's real property and interfering with the Bank's mortgage interest.

Under Cyprus Law — and remember, this is the one the Banks will use in their Court Actions against the Purchasers in the Courts in Cyprus - this eventuality does not arise.

«Florida Court Rejects Claim, a Boon for Morgan Stanley»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «The Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an appeal by the financier Ronald O. Perelman, who asked the court to restore a $ 1.58 billion verdict against the investment bank Morgan Stanley.&rCourt Rejects Claim, a Boon for Morgan Stanley»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «The Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an appeal by the financier Ronald O. Perelman, who asked the court to restore a $ 1.58 billion verdict against the investment bank Morgan Stanley.&rCourt on Wednesday rejected an appeal by the financier Ronald O. Perelman, who asked the court to restore a $ 1.58 billion verdict against the investment bank Morgan Stanley.&rcourt to restore a $ 1.58 billion verdict against the investment bank Morgan Stanley.»

Obtained dismissal of a fraud claim brought in federal court against the former vice president of finance of an investment bank that misappropriated a $ 4 million investment and transferred it for its own use.

He has 12 years» experience of major commercial litigation in such diverse areas as bribery and corruption of senior executives and misappropriation of corporate assets (including the 24 - week Fiona Trust trial), international arbitration (typically LCIA, ICC, LMAA and UNCITRAL and frequently for or against states or state - owned companies), proceedings in the Commercial Court under the Arbitration Act 1996, banking litigation, offshore engineering, shipping and insurance.

The hedge fund, for which the firm was acting in respect of its defence of a US$ 70 million claim, was successful in the Court of Appeal in overturning the grant of an injunction preventing it from continuing its fraud proceedings commenced against the bank in Texas.

The Supreme Court held in 2013 that earlier sanctions imposed on the Bank by HM Treasury were irrational and disproportionate, and the Bank's claim for damages against the Treasury under the Human Rights Act 1998 is listed for trial in the Commercial Court in October 2016.

The State Bank of India initiated insolvency proceedings against a number of Indian companies including Electrosteel in a bankruptcy court in June 2017.

His recent cases include defending the former President and majority shareholder of VAB Bank against charges of contempt of court (sole counsel); acting for Mercuria Energy Trading in its successful defence of a US$ 270 million claim by Citibank in one of the biggest High Court banking trials of 2014, acting for the Claimant in an on - going US$ 830 million fraud claim in the Commercial Court (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & ocourt (sole counsel); acting for Mercuria Energy Trading in its successful defence of a US$ 270 million claim by Citibank in one of the biggest High Court banking trials of 2014, acting for the Claimant in an on - going US$ 830 million fraud claim in the Commercial Court (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & oCourt banking trials of 2014, acting for the Claimant in an on - going US$ 830 million fraud claim in the Commercial Court (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & oCourt (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & ors v.

Nigeria has filed a USD 875 million lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase at the High Court in London, alleging that the international bank facilitated bank transfers on behalf of a corrupt former government minister — allegations which it denies.

Recently, in Boudreau v. Bank of Montreal, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a motion dismissing a lawsuit against Bank of Montreal (BMO), Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers), and Umbro Inc. (Umbro).

The banks lost, they appealed to the court against the arbitrators» award invoking AA 1996, s 68 (serious procedural irregularity).

KRS Kovacs Reti Szegheo has successfully represented the liquidator of Buda - Cash against Saxo Bank in the Metropolitan Regional Court in Hungary, after the Danish bank blocked Buda - Cash's customers» moBank in the Metropolitan Regional Court in Hungary, after the Danish bank blocked Buda - Cash's customers» mobank blocked Buda - Cash's customers» money.

Representing Russian Bank, OJSC URALSIB BANK, in High Court proceedings in a claim brought by the bank against other lenders in a syndicated loan arrangement concerning alleged events of default arising out of a USD100 million loan participation nBank, OJSC URALSIB BANK, in High Court proceedings in a claim brought by the bank against other lenders in a syndicated loan arrangement concerning alleged events of default arising out of a USD100 million loan participation nBANK, in High Court proceedings in a claim brought by the bank against other lenders in a syndicated loan arrangement concerning alleged events of default arising out of a USD100 million loan participation nbank against other lenders in a syndicated loan arrangement concerning alleged events of default arising out of a USD100 million loan participation note.

In the unusual bonus claim case of Herbert v JP Morgan (2012), he successfully defended the investment bank against a High Court, Queen's Bench Division claim by an banker for a bonus based on an alleged negligent misrepresentation during the recruitment process.

Successfully settled for CREDIT SUISSE TRUST in Guernsey a High Court claim against an international bank for breach of duty and fraudulent misrepresentation in respect of advice given to invest in a US$ 50m property project in Dubai.

The plaintiff was appealing a Superior Court decision that declined leave in a proposed action against the National Bank of Canada.