Sentences with phrase «court against the insurance»

Going to court against the insurance companies is war.

Not exact matches

In the words of the chief justice in the Chaoulli v. Quebec case, in which the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the prohibition against private health insurance in the province in 2005, «Access to a waiting list is not access to health care.»

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

On March 26, a group of New York — based lawyers headed by Edward D. Fagan, who spearheaded successful suits on behalf of Holocaust survivors against European firms that collaborated with the Nazis in using concentration camp inmates as laborers, filed suit in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn against FleetBoston Financial, the insurance giant Aetna, and railroad conglomerate CSX Corporation, on the grounds that these corporations are the successors of companies that profited from slavery before the Civil War.

Prediction: If the Supreme Court rules against Obamacare or whatever you want to call it, the insurance companies will have a green light.

I'm going to walk into my business to day and give my employes an announcement, that even though my religious convictions are against the idea of western medicine and the supreme court has allowed me to refuse you medical insurance because of it i wont.

Topics to be discussed include: Court Procedure: An understanding of the civil litigation process in New Jersey as it pertains to negligence claims; Damages: Understanding the standards for, and the differences between Compensatory and Punitive Damages; Facility Maintenance: Identifying potential safety hazards related to facilities and grounds, and taking reasonable steps to address common problems; Indemnification: Identifying when the school district is responsible for the actions of its employees, and when it may disclaim coverage; Insurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school dInsurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school dinsurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school dInsurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school districts.

If a claim is made against your property, title insurance will, in accordance with the terms of your policy, assure you of a legal defense and pay all court costs and related fees.

If a policy of insurance has been or shall be effected by any person on his own life or upon the life of another person, the policyowner shall be entitled to any accelerated payments of the death benefit or accelerated payment of a special surrender value permitted under such policy as against the creditors, personal representatives, trustees in bankruptcy and receivers in state and federal courts of the policyowner.

In 2005 the company won a lawsuit against National Union Fire Insurance relating to its director's and officers» insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US DistriInsurance relating to its director's and officers» insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US Distriinsurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US District Court.

The liability portion of homeowners insurance covers you against lawsuits for bodily injury or property damage that you or family members or pets cause to other people, as well as court costs incurred and damages awarded.

This overwhelmingly «christian» congress represents an overwhelming «christian» nation has that: performs a million abortions a year, has out 40 % of births out of wedlock (approaching 70 percent in minority communities), has a Supreme Court that has ruled that virtual child pornography is protected by the first amendment, has a culture that teaches ever younger girls (through movies, music, tv, books and magazines) that their primary function is as living sex toys for men, forces religions to provide insurance to include abortifacients against their faith, and is rapidly redefining marriage by judicial edict.

The court in the Western District of Pennsylvania signed off on a magistrate judge's recommendation and report, in Despot v. Baltimore Life Insurance Co., which noted that the man had a «pattern of filing conclusory complaints against former and prospective employers,» and that because of his history in the federal courts, «his pro se status does not save his complaint.»

This type of insurance has the effect of leveling the playing field when an injured person is going to court against a well - financed insurance company.

The insurance company may say something like a settlement is being offered for «nuisance value,» or the amount that the insurance company is willing to pay to settle the claim because it would spend even more (on attorney's fees, court costs, expert witnesses, etc.) than the offered amount to defend against the «nuisance» of the victim's claim.

First Circuit Court of Appeals Allows c. 93A Case to Proceed Against Insurance Company; Previous State Suit did not bar Claim:: Massachusetts Insurance Litigation Lawyer Breakstone, White & Gluck

First Circuit Court of Appeals Allows c. 93A Case to Proceed Against Insurance Company; Previous State Suit did not bar Claim

Claims against your own insurance company do not generally require filing any lawsuits in court.

We deal with the large, well - known auto insurance companies on a regular basis and litigate cases against them in court.

Lord Jackson attended at that seminar and although it is perhaps ironic that the Scottish Civil Courts Review may have a serious impact on the effectiveness of the current Court of Session procedures, in that they will be moved to the Sheriff Court, Lord Jackson, although approving of the Scottish system, was aware of the need for protection against awards of costs, which is of course currently widely available in England through the provision of ATE insurance.

He has 12 years» experience of major commercial litigation in such diverse areas as bribery and corruption of senior executives and misappropriation of corporate assets (including the 24 - week Fiona Trust trial), international arbitration (typically LCIA, ICC, LMAA and UNCITRAL and frequently for or against states or state - owned companies), proceedings in the Commercial Court under the Arbitration Act 1996, banking litigation, offshore engineering, shipping and insurance.

A lower award was made to a 19 year old claimant Laura Tennant who pursued an action against Direct Line Insurance in Kilmarnock Sheriff Court (SLT 16/7/10 page 71) the sheriff awarded # 2000 for pain and suffering for an injury to neck with pain radiating to the arms, back and shoulders and a full recovery after 13 months.

Chris Morrison and Stephanie Quesnelle appeared in the Ontario Court of Appeal to successfully have a claim against The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company Dismissed.

In her decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Mary Sanderson said it would be contrary to public policy to reward the insurance company's uncompromising behaviour by assessing minimal costs against it.

For the reasons given by the Court of Appeal, we are all of the opinion that the exclusion from the insurance policy based on art. 2402 of the Civil Code of Québec may not be set up against the heirs of the insured, as that article must, even in light of s. 34 (1) of the federal Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I - 21, be interpreted having regard to the principles of interpretation that apply in the area of insurance law so as to favour the precision and certainty of the grounds for exclusion in such matters.

The two parties couldn't agree on how to interpret the insurance contract, and Jakubowicz filed a case against State Farm, asking the courts to decide.

The Court of Appeal found the judge at Kusnierz» 2010 trial against his insurance company, Economical, erred when he concluded that Kusnierz» psychological impairments should not be combined with his physical impairments, and that Kusnierz had therefore not sustained a catastrophic impairment.

Tomorrow's case pits a town and a municipality against a developer, and on Wednesday the court will hear two companion insurance cases — likewise from Quebec — that involve compensation for moveable property in a hotel's custody.

On October 1, 2010, Ontario Superior Court Justice J. N. Morissette granted a $ 455.7 million judgment in Jeffrey and Rudd v. London Life, a complex class action brought against two insurance companies regarding their use of surplus earnings held in an account for the benefit of holders of London Life insurance policies (the «PAR Account»).

You can either enter into a settlement agreement with the at - fault party's insurance company or file a personal injury lawsuit against that party in Texas state or federal court.

If your case must proceed to court, your Garden Grove personal injury lawyer will file suit on your behalf against the person who injured you, not the insurance company itself (unless the party at fault was uninsured or underinsured).

In particular, the court held that Penn State is not entitled to any insurance coverage under seven PMA policies in effect from 1992 through 1999 because these policies contained an enforceable exclusion that excluded coverage for the sexual abuse claims against Penn State.

Assisting one of the world's largest independent insurance brokers in defending threatened injunctive action in respect of the recruitment of individuals to its employee benefits group and successfully avoiding threatened High Court litigation against the company and individuals joining it.

On November 26, 2014 the Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion related to the rights to a former spouse to collect against an insurance policy.

Ontario Court Provides «Appropriate» Relief Against Statutory Limitation For Insurance Claims

In Oliveira v. Aviva Canada Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether a «Professional and General Liability and Comprehensive Dishonesty, Disappearance and Destruction Insurance Policy» purchased by a Canadian hospital required the insurer to defend a hospital employee against a privacy breach lawsuit by a former patient.

On Friday, a Jackson County Circuit Court jury awarded $ 20 million in punitive damages in a case that alleged retaliation, age and sex discrimination against an American Family Insurance sales manager.

Successfully defended insurance company in a bench trial in the Superior Court against unfair claims handling lawsuit, where insurer had improperly denied coverage

While it may sound simpler than court, it can be complicated, and you will have the insurance company trial lawyers (working for your own insurance company) against you every step of the way.

The court acknowledged that the insured expected the insurance policy to provide protection against loss resulting from criminal action, but reasoned that the policy only covered losses that fell within the restricted coverage set out in the policy.

In The Brick Warehouse LP v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench held that a traditional crime coverage policy did not protect the insured against losses resulting from a business email compromise scam that deceived the insured's employee into instructing the insured's bank to transfer funds to a bank account controlled by the cyber-criminal.

Acted for the liquidator of a large insurance company in a Supreme Court claim in Australia against Executive Directors and Corporate defendants in relation to misleading auditors, the publication of misleading financial accounts and breaches of statutory duties and approximately worth AUD $ 500 million.

In the course of proceedings before the tribunal between the commissioners and the taxpayer company, X, in relation to X's liability under a county court judgment for unpaid PAYE income tax and national insurance contributions, the tribunal awarded costs in the sum of # 30,500, against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the tribunal, rules and directions».

In this case involving a breach of contract action filed by a condominium association's property management company against an insurance company, concerning the scope of a policy issued to the condo association, the Alexandria U.S. District Court says defendant carrier...

Business Development: Brokering various business dealings that further the diversification of Indian economies Developing and accessing commercial financial programs and services for tribal governments, including tax - exempt offerings and federally - guaranteed housing loans Serving as issuer or underwriter's counsel in tribal bond issuances Ensuring tribal compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and other federal financial regulatory requirements Handling federal and state income, excise, B&O, property and other tax matters for tribes and tribal businesses Chartering tribal business enterprises under tribal, state and federal law Registering and protecting tribal trademarks and copyrights Negotiating franchise agreements for restaurants and retail stores on Indian reservations Custom - tailoring construction contracts for tribes and general contractors Helping secure federal SBA 8 (a) and other contracting preferences for Indian - owned businesses Facilitating contractual relations between tribes and tribal casinos, and gaming vendors Building tribal workers» compensation and self - insurance programs Government Relations: Handling state and federal regulatory matters in the areas of tribal gaming, environmental and cultural resources, workers» compensation, taxation, health care and education Negotiating tribal - state gaming compacts and fuel and cigarette compacts, and inter-local land use and law enforcement agreements Advocacy before the Washington State Gambling Commission, Washington Indian Gaming Association and National Indian Gaming Commission Preparing tribal codes and regulations, including tribal court, commercial, gaming, taxation, energy development, environmental and cultural resources protection, labor & employment, and workers» compensation laws Developing employee handbooks, manuals and personnel policies Advocacy in areas of treaty rights, gaming, jurisdiction, taxation, environmental and cultural resource protection Brokering fee - to - trust and related real estate and jurisdictional transactions Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal rights.

Drivers can seek compensation through a bicyclist's homeowner's or renter's insurance policy, or against the cyclist individually in small claims court.

What a deposition is, is you going into a conference room, like this, talking to the defense attorney and a court reporter typing it up, where the insurance adjuster and the defense council are trying to gather information against you so they can use it at the hearing.

Not only do we represent injured motorcyclists in court against big business insurance companies, we ride, too.

Ms. Frese was admitted to the Louisiana State Bar in 2005 and since that time has practiced in both state and federal court in the area of insurance defense defending individuals, businesses, employers, insurance companies, and self - insured funds against property, personal injury, automobile, workers compensation, general commercial and employer's liability claims.

By following these basic steps, individuals can minimize the amount of damage and to make sure that the case remains as strong as possible in proceeding against an insurance company or court of law.