Going to
court against the insurance companies is war.
Not exact matches
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent
companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and
against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation,
court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and
insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.
On March 26, a group of New York — based lawyers headed by Edward D. Fagan, who spearheaded successful suits on behalf of Holocaust survivors
against European firms that collaborated with the Nazis in using concentration camp inmates as laborers, filed suit in U.S. District
Court in Brooklyn
against FleetBoston Financial, the
insurance giant Aetna, and railroad conglomerate CSX Corporation, on the grounds that these corporations are the successors of
companies that profited from slavery before the Civil War.
Prediction: If the Supreme
Court rules
against Obamacare or whatever you want to call it, the
insurance companies will have a green light.
Topics to be discussed include:
Court Procedure: An understanding of the civil litigation process in New Jersey as it pertains to negligence claims; Damages: Understanding the standards for, and the differences between Compensatory and Punitive Damages; Facility Maintenance: Identifying potential safety hazards related to facilities and grounds, and taking reasonable steps to address common problems; Indemnification: Identifying when the school district is responsible for the actions of its employees, and when it may disclaim coverage;
Insurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school d
Insurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's
insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school d
insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the
Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school d
Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims
against school districts.
In 2005 the
company won a lawsuit
against National Union Fire
Insurance relating to its director's and officers» insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US Distri
Insurance relating to its director's and officers»
insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US Distri
insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US District
Court.
This type of
insurance has the effect of leveling the playing field when an injured person is going to
court against a well - financed
insurance company.
The
insurance company may say something like a settlement is being offered for «nuisance value,» or the amount that the
insurance company is willing to pay to settle the claim because it would spend even more (on attorney's fees,
court costs, expert witnesses, etc.) than the offered amount to defend
against the «nuisance» of the victim's claim.
First Circuit
Court of Appeals Allows c. 93A Case to Proceed
Against Insurance Company; Previous State Suit did not bar Claim:: Massachusetts
Insurance Litigation Lawyer Breakstone, White & Gluck
First Circuit
Court of Appeals Allows c. 93A Case to Proceed
Against Insurance Company; Previous State Suit did not bar Claim
Claims
against your own
insurance company do not generally require filing any lawsuits in
court.
We deal with the large, well - known auto
insurance companies on a regular basis and litigate cases
against them in
court.
He has 12 years» experience of major commercial litigation in such diverse areas as bribery and corruption of senior executives and misappropriation of corporate assets (including the 24 - week Fiona Trust trial), international arbitration (typically LCIA, ICC, LMAA and UNCITRAL and frequently for or
against states or state - owned
companies), proceedings in the Commercial
Court under the Arbitration Act 1996, banking litigation, offshore engineering, shipping and
insurance.
Chris Morrison and Stephanie Quesnelle appeared in the Ontario
Court of Appeal to successfully have a claim
against The Dominion of Canada General
Insurance Company Dismissed.
In her decision, Ontario Superior
Court Justice Mary Sanderson said it would be contrary to public policy to reward the
insurance company's uncompromising behaviour by assessing minimal costs
against it.
The
Court of Appeal found the judge at Kusnierz» 2010 trial
against his
insurance company, Economical, erred when he concluded that Kusnierz» psychological impairments should not be combined with his physical impairments, and that Kusnierz had therefore not sustained a catastrophic impairment.
On October 1, 2010, Ontario Superior
Court Justice J. N. Morissette granted a $ 455.7 million judgment in Jeffrey and Rudd v. London Life, a complex class action brought
against two
insurance companies regarding their use of surplus earnings held in an account for the benefit of holders of London Life
insurance policies (the «PAR Account»).
You can either enter into a settlement agreement with the at - fault party's
insurance company or file a personal injury lawsuit
against that party in Texas state or federal
court.
If your case must proceed to
court, your Garden Grove personal injury lawyer will file suit on your behalf
against the person who injured you, not the
insurance company itself (unless the party at fault was uninsured or underinsured).
Assisting one of the world's largest independent
insurance brokers in defending threatened injunctive action in respect of the recruitment of individuals to its employee benefits group and successfully avoiding threatened High
Court litigation
against the
company and individuals joining it.
Successfully defended
insurance company in a bench trial in the Superior
Court against unfair claims handling lawsuit, where insurer had improperly denied coverage
While it may sound simpler than
court, it can be complicated, and you will have the
insurance company trial lawyers (working for your own
insurance company)
against you every step of the way.
In The Brick Warehouse LP v. Chubb
Insurance Company of Canada the Alberta
Court of Queen's Bench held that a traditional crime coverage policy did not protect the insured
against losses resulting from a business email compromise scam that deceived the insured's employee into instructing the insured's bank to transfer funds to a bank account controlled by the cyber-criminal.
Acted for the liquidator of a large
insurance company in a Supreme
Court claim in Australia
against Executive Directors and Corporate defendants in relation to misleading auditors, the publication of misleading financial accounts and breaches of statutory duties and approximately worth AUD $ 500 million.
In the course of proceedings before the tribunal between the commissioners and the taxpayer
company, X, in relation to X's liability under a county
court judgment for unpaid PAYE income tax and national
insurance contributions, the tribunal awarded costs in the sum of # 30,500,
against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the tribunal, rules and directions».
In this case involving a breach of contract action filed by a condominium association's property management
company against an
insurance company, concerning the scope of a policy issued to the condo association, the Alexandria U.S. District
Court says defendant carrier...
Not only do we represent injured motorcyclists in
court against big business
insurance companies, we ride, too.
Ms. Frese was admitted to the Louisiana State Bar in 2005 and since that time has practiced in both state and federal
court in the area of
insurance defense defending individuals, businesses, employers,
insurance companies, and self - insured funds
against property, personal injury, automobile, workers compensation, general commercial and employer's liability claims.
By following these basic steps, individuals can minimize the amount of damage and to make sure that the case remains as strong as possible in proceeding
against an
insurance company or
court of law.
Plaintiffs allege that State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company conspired with Illinois Supreme
Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier's campaign to elect Karmeier to the Supreme
Court, with State Farm providing campaign funding in exchange for Karmeier's vote to overturn the judgment
against them.
The driver asked the
Court to order the
insurance company to defend her
against the motorcyclist's lawsuit under the liability coverage of her automobile
insurance policy.
Michael scored two landmark rulings in Federal
Court in Ayres v. USAA Casualty
Insurance Company and Cunningham v. Liberty Mutual Fire
Insurance Company, pushing back
against insurers improperly applying changes to Florida's sinkhole legislation.
A Massachusetts superior
court has recently ruled that an
insurance company choosing to appeal a jury's decision to a higher
court rather than extend a formal settlement offer after a verdict has been entered
against them is NOT a commission of unfair settlement practices.
Tolliday v Omega, a High
Court contractual claim by a former MD
against an
insurance company, which was settled shortly before the hearing in March 2012;
Most prominently, people injured in a motor vehicle accident are no longer permitted to commence
court proceedings
against insurance companies arising from the denial of their accident benefits.
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. - In an order issued the day after Christmas, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court overturned the dismissal of a malicious prosecution claim brought by a neurologist
against an
insurance company.
The Pennsylvania Superior
Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of
Court reversed the ruling of the trial
court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of
court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict
against Kim's client, a mutual
insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of law.
Anders represented one of Sweden's largest construction
companies in Swedish Supreme
Court proceedings
against a global
insurance company regarding claims under a construction contract.
We have over 40 years of experience going
against insurance companies in
court and advocating on behalf of our clients.
Obtaining summary judgment in federal
court on all Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims based on separation pay benefits brought
against a national
insurance company.
If the
insurance companies are unwilling to make you a fair settlement offer, a personal injury lawyer can file a lawsuit
against the other parties in
court so that you can get the compensation you deserve.
ATLANTA (July 2, 2003)-- The Supreme
Court of Georgia has upheld the dismissal of a class action
against Bankers Life
Insurance Company, represented by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
Recently, the Maine Supreme Judicial
Court considered a lawsuit
against a homeowners»
insurance company brought by the family of a man killed by another on property belonging to attacker's grandmother.
On October 28, 2010, First American Title
Insurance Company («First American») earned a judgment and damages award in its favor in the amount of $ 434,913.39, plus interest, in Colorado state
court against Jeffrey Lavenhar.
Arthur J Gallagher Ltd v Aston Scott Group [2017] High
Court: Claim
against insurance company and executives for breaches of restrictive covenants and misuse of confidential information.
In 1997, Haden hired Sacks to prepare a brief to the 5th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals in an appeal of an adverse judgment
against Haden and his
company in Haden v. Metropolitan Life
Insurance Co., a commercial landlord - tenant dispute.
We do not hesitate to try your case in
court, going toe - to - toe
against big
insurance companies and powerful corporations that put their profit before your safety.
If you've been injured in a car accident, you'll need to call a car accident lawyer Rockville MD trusts to represent your rights; both
against the
insurance company and in a
court of law.
Among other significant matters, she secured a historic victory for State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company, when the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a $ 145 million punitive damages award against the company as unconstitutionally exc
Company, when the U.S. Supreme
Court reversed a $ 145 million punitive damages award
against the
company as unconstitutionally exc
company as unconstitutionally excessive.
Since your
insurance company has a duty to defend in the event of a civil action taken
against you, your policy would likely pay for your defense in
court — unless specifically excluded by your provider.