Sentences with phrase «court application date»

Before the court application date the owner granted permission to enter her unit as long as she was present during the inspection.

Not exact matches

The squeeze - out of the minority shareholders can be completed at the end of six weeks from the date the notice has been given, subject to the minority shareholders failing to successfully lodge an application to the court to prevent such squeeze - out any time prior to the end of those six weeks following which the offeror can execute a transfer of the outstanding shares in its favor and pay the consideration to us, which would hold the consideration on trust for the outstanding minority shareholders.

The prosecution counsel, Alex Izinyon SAN, demanded for dates for trial but Nkem Okoro, counsel representing Melaye, persuaded the court to hear his application for bail.

In view of his plea, the prosecuting counsel, Rimamsomte Ezekiel, asked the court for a date for trial, but the defence counsel, R. N. Mbu, objected saying, he had a pending bail application before the court.

The NASUWT has today received formal notification from the High Court of the hearing date for its application for judicial review of the Coalition Government's decision to change the index - linking of public service workers» pensions, including teachers» pensions, from the Retail Price Index (RPI) to Consumer Price Index (CPI).

(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).

He intimated the court that he would not be objecting to the second application, which was also dated June 12 and brought by Omokore's counsel, R.A. Rabana, SAN, «asking for permission or leave of court permitting him to travel».

Jacobs, who also told the court that «I want to file additional proofs of evidence, and intend to call more witnesses», then urged the court to fix a date for hearing of arguments with regards to the application challenging the court's jurisdiction, brought by Membere's counsel, Osaro Eghobamien, SAN.

According to the court, the counsels for and against the case would have to argue the application on the adjourned date.

In his writ filed on Friday, Mr Amidu, popularly known as Citizen Vigilante, said: «I oppose the application for stay of proceeding on the main ground that it discloses no reasonable ground or grounds for the making of an application for stay of proceedings to this Court pending the discharge or reversal of the ruling order of this Court dated 16th November 2016 aforesaid to warrant its consideration by this Court.»

The Supreme Court has abridged the date for the hearing of an application filed by Ghana's Electoral Commission (EC) challenging a high court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential Court has abridged the date for the hearing of an application filed by Ghana's Electoral Commission (EC) challenging a high court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential race.

The counsel for the defendants, S. I Ameh (SAN), informed the court that he had a pending bail application dated March 27, 2017 and served on the prosecution same date.

In a fresh application to the Supreme Court dated March 23, 2018, Dr. Ayine filed an...

The application is not asking for indefinite adjournment, but an adjournment to a specific date occasioned by the decision of the Supreme Court.»

However, Bala's counsel, Chris Uche, SAN, informed the court of a pending bail application dated May 5, 2017 and urged the court to grant his prayers.

But Metuh, in swift reaction filed an application, dated Oct. 14, praying the court to allow him replace Usim - Wilson, with the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu.

However, the defense counsel, Folunso Adegalu, urged the court to accede to his bail application dated February 27, 2017 «to enable the defendant prepare for his trial».

Counsel to the first defendant, Samuel Zibiri, SAN, on the other hand, told the court that, he had a pending bail application dated March 2, 2016 and filed March 3, 2016.

But in her motion challenging the EFCC's ex parte application, Mrs. Jonathan, sought «an order of this court striking out the respondent's ex parte originating summons dated September 20, 2017, filed at the registry of this court honourable court on the same date, on the ground that this honourable court lacks the jurisdiction to entertain the said application.»

However, Mr. Amidu in his affidavit argued that Woyome's application is «intended to subvert the order of this court dated 16th November 2016.»

Ikani had asked the court to adjourn the hearing of the bail application to a further date, saying that he needed more time to respond to the issues raised therein.

Speaking to Citi FM's Richard Dela Sky, the lead lawyer for the NPP, Godfred Dame said «we are in court because the original application for interim injunction filed by David Hoezame had been fixed for hearing on September 2, 2014 and we feel like clearly it will not accord with justice and fairness if the application is heard on that day because clearly the date postdates the date that has been fixed by the NPP for its special delegates conference.»

He drew the attention of the court to Exhibit three attached to the application, which is a letter dated February 14, 2018 addressed to Dr. Raymond Onwuelo by Mr. Andrean T. H. Kessy, a Neurological and Spinal Surgery Consultant in London, stating detailed health status of Metuh.

Court Judgments, credit / loan applications or overdue accounts (over 60 days) are listed on your credit file for 5 years from the date of listing and NOT the day the infringement or judgment occurred.

It makes no difference if your creditor is threatening to garnish your wages, has set a date to make a court application or served a garnishment order on your employer.

If you file for personal bankruptcy more than five years after the date of the «end of your education» then you are entitled to bring an application before a court seeking a «court - ordered discharge» pursuant to a «hardship provision» under federal bankruptcy law

Where a variable PPO is made, it follows that the court remains seized of its jurisdiction to consider any application to review the level of the payments at a future date should the contingency materialise.

While not specifically drawn up in respect of pending court proceedings, on the date of denying access, three sets of court proceedings were pending which related specifically to the legality of the EU - Turkey arrangement, and the Commission had already lodged applications for leave to intervene in all three (para 76).

«(1) On an application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule... the court will consider all the circumstances including --(a) the interests of the administration of justice; (b) whether the application for relief has been made promptly; (c) whether the failure to comply was intentional; (d) whether there is a good explanation for the failure; (e) the extent to which the party in default has complied with other rules,...; (f) whether the failure to comply was caused by the party or the party's legal representative; (g) whether the hearing date... can still be met if relief is granted; (h) the effect which the failure to comply had on each party; and (i) the effect which the granting of relief would have on each party or a child whose interest the court considers relevant.

7) All court dates and availability should be readily assessed online, and bookable online upon filing your application.

The court is to have regard to all the circumstances of the case including: the withdrawal grounds relied on and whether or not new evidence has come to light which was not available when the admission was made; the conduct of the parties including any conduct which led to the admission being made, any prejudice that may be caused if the admission is withdrawn and if withdrawal is refused, the stage in the proceedings at which the application to withdraw is made, in particular in relation to the trial date; the prospects of success (if withdrawal) for the claimant; and the interests of the administration of justice.

Where a creditor's application with notice to register a judgment in Alberta is successful, the judgment is of the same force and effect as if as if it had been a judgment given originally in the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench on the date of the registration and is valid for ten years from that date.

If want to cancel, or adjourn, your court date, you simply contact the Clerk's office at the courthouse where you filed your documents and ask them to take your application «off the list».

In that case, HHJ Pelling QC determined that the court's discretion was «unfettered» (in Hildyard J's words) and was «to be exercised by reference to all the relevant circumstances as they exist at the date when the application is determined».

Since the release of these court orders, CJC communications director Johanna Laporte says they are expecting the Federal Court to set a hearing date for the judicial review applicacourt orders, CJC communications director Johanna Laporte says they are expecting the Federal Court to set a hearing date for the judicial review applicaCourt to set a hearing date for the judicial review application.

Not less than 120 days before the date scheduled for the trial of the proceeding, and b) all further applications, procedures, or other steps in the proceeding, including interim injunctions are, unless the court otherwise orders, suspended until the motion, including any appeal of the motion, has been finally disposed of.

Acted for the Defendant school governing body, opposing an application made by the Headteacher for an injunction to compel completion of a contractual disciplinary procedure by a certain date (in the High Court, Chancery Division).

This applies both where that advice is limited in time, eg until after a criminal defence statement has been filed and served and, worse still, the advice is given not to make such a response at all; • (f) the date on which a party to care proceedings is to file and serve a criminal defence statement in linked criminal proceedings is wholly irrelevant to the court's determination of the date on which that party should file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement in the care proceedings; • (g) the mere fact that a party is ordered to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served in criminal proceedings is not a ground for failing to comply with the former order; • (h) it [is not] a ground for an application to extend the time for compliance with an order to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement until a date after the criminal defence statement has been filed and served; and • (i) any issue about alleged prejudice to a defendant in criminal proceedings based on him being required to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date of a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served, or at all, only arises and is only potentially relevant if and when an application is made by the police and / or a co-accused for statements and documents filed in the family proceedings to be disclosed into linked criminal proceedings [see Re C (A Minor)(Care Proceedings: Disclosure)[1997] Fam 76, [1997] 2 WLR 322, sub nom Re EC (Disclosure of Material)[1996] 2 FLR 725, CA].

There are also probably some «local rules» in each court addressing issues such as the mailing address and operating hours of the court, the way that hearing dates are scheduled, the process by which motions are considered, the duty if any of parties to confer with each other or engaged in ADR, mandatory pre-trial disclosure obligations, civil cover sheets for new cases, standard deadlines to finish tasks that don't have deadlines in the general application civil rules, preferred forms for certain kinds of motions and orders such as entries of appearance, etc..

No evidence was provided to the court and the submission was rejected the judge stating that it «must have been obvious to the defendant long before» the date of application.

There are also two general rules that apply to such scenarios: 1) retroactive child support extends back three years from the date the paying spouse is given notice (for example by the fact that an application for an adjustment to support is launched with the court), unless there has been blameworthy conduct; and 2) the child must be a «child of the marriage» — and therefore eligible to receive support — at the time the application is made.

As a result of ss.11 (b) and 24 (1), anyone who feels that their right to trial within a reasonable time has been violated or denied, can make an application to the court prior to their trial date, indicating their intention to argue unconstitutional delay.

She is now precluded from instituting any new action of any nature or court proceeding of any nature in any court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court proceeding of any nature in any court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to date.

They will issue you a court file number and will sign and date your application.

If the court dismisses a s. 11 (b) application, the original matter proceeds to its scheduled trial date.

The Notice of Application to Federal Court was made available in a Twitter posting dated December 12 and should still be available to read here on Google Docs.

Once the above 4 steps are completed, you and your spouse will need to take the next court steps such as setting down a Notice of Application, Attending a Judicial Case Conference, booking a trial date, etc..

The process for setting your hearing date for lengthy Chambers applications is that you must schedule your hearing directly with the Supreme Court Registry.

In my last post titled Apple And The «All Writs Act» dated November 2, 2015, I discussed an application before Magistrate Judge James Orenstein of the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, in In Re Order Requiring...

In my last post titled Apple And The «All Writs Act» dated November 2, 2015, I discussed an application before Magistrate Judge James Orenstein of the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, in In Re Order Requiring Apple, Inc..