At a temporary hearing shortly thereafter
the court awarded the parties alternating week custody of their young daughter.
Not exact matches
And in some circumstances, if one
party refuses to disclose their cryptocurrency holdings, the
court can make an
award heavily in favor of the other
party to make up for it.
Judgment upon the
Award may be entered by any
court having jurisdiction thereof or having jurisdiction over the relevant
party or its assets;
But without a majority decision on Halo, it could be more difficult for district
courts to
award attorneys» fees to prevailing
parties in patent troll cases, which every year sap billions of dollars in such fees.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest
Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest
Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to
Party or third
party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to
party claims, damages,
awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation,
court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third
party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to
party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third
party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to
party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.
From the
award - winning Final Cut Steakhouse to the food
court, none of the casino's foodservice is contracted to third -
party vendors.
One other feature of Canadian law that tends to discourage
parties from suing physicians for malpractice is that the Supreme
Court has set out guidelines that effectively cap
awards for pain and suffering in all but exceptional cases.
The
court may also
award joint custody if one
party requests joint custody and the
court finds it to be in the best interests of the child.
Georgia: The
court may
award joint custody and may consider agreements of the
parties, if they are in the best interests of the child.
A
court may
award visitation rights if the child's parents» marriage is terminated, the parents separate, or custody of the child is given to a third
party other than the child's parents.
Under Alabama law, a
court may consider an
award of joint custody, whereby the parental rights of both
parties remain intact, with one parent as the primary custodian of the children and the other as the secondary custodian.
The police has no business interfering in transaction of this nature only a civil
court has the power to enquire on the transaction and
award necessary damages to the innocent
party.
The «second tier» mandates the
award of attorney fees when a
party denied access to records «has substantially prevailed» and the
court finds that «the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access.»
Court rules bar
party leaders from receiving such fee
awards.
Senator Mark's counsel, Ken Ikonne and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) lawyer Johnson Usman as well as the People's Democratic
Party (PDP) counsel, Chris Alechenu had told the
Court that section 285 (5) of the 1999 constitution was clear on the fact the day of declaration of an election result should be included in the days allowed for the filing of a petition before a court, urging the appellate court to dismiss the appeal and award cost against the appel
Court that section 285 (5) of the 1999 constitution was clear on the fact the day of declaration of an election result should be included in the days allowed for the filing of a petition before a
court, urging the appellate court to dismiss the appeal and award cost against the appel
court, urging the appellate
court to dismiss the appeal and award cost against the appel
court to dismiss the appeal and
award cost against the appellate.
I'm predicting, if it goes that far, the
courts will
award each
party a case of Dumbass.
For any matters which are not subject to arbitration as set forth in these Official Rules and / or in connection with the entering of any judgment on an arbitration
award in connection with these Official Rules and / or the Contest, the
parties irrevocably submit and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and federal
courts located in or closest to the County of New York in the State of New York.
This provision shall not prevent either
party from filing a petition in
court to confirm an arbitration
award.
Costs of arbitration, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred in arbitration as determined by the Arbitrator, together with any reasonable attorney's fees incurred by prevailing
party in
Court enforcement of the arbitration
award after it is rendered by the Arbitrator, shall be paid to the prevailing
party by the
party designated by the Arbitrator or
Court.
«(a) FILING AND EFFECT OF ARBITRATION
AWARD - An arbitration award made by an arbitrator under this chapter, along with proof of service of such award on the other party by the prevailing party or by the plaintiff, shall be filed promptly after the arbitration hearing is concluded with the clerk of the district court that referred the case to arbitra
AWARD - An arbitration
award made by an arbitrator under this chapter, along with proof of service of such award on the other party by the prevailing party or by the plaintiff, shall be filed promptly after the arbitration hearing is concluded with the clerk of the district court that referred the case to arbitra
award made by an arbitrator under this chapter, along with proof of service of such
award on the other party by the prevailing party or by the plaintiff, shall be filed promptly after the arbitration hearing is concluded with the clerk of the district court that referred the case to arbitra
award on the other
party by the prevailing
party or by the plaintiff, shall be filed promptly after the arbitration hearing is concluded with the clerk of the district
court that referred the case to arbitration.
«(1) TIME FOR FILING DEMAND - Within 30 days after the filing of an arbitration
award with a district
court under subsection (a), any
party may file a written demand for a trial de novo in the district
court.
A damage
award can be agreed upon after a negotiated settlement — among the
parties, their insurance companies, and their attorneys, for example — or may be ordered by a judge or jury following a
court trial.
Judgment on the
award made by the arbitrator may be entered in any
court having jurisdiction over the
parties.
If either
party fails to comply with the arbitrator's
award, the injured
party may petition the circuit
court for enforcement.
The number of class actions has risen to seven, according to media reports, and one of those
parties communicated its displeasure immediately to an Ontario Superior
Court judge, in an effort to prevent Loblaw from making it a condition that consumers who receive a $ 25 gift card would have that amount deducted from any future
awards.
In determining who should be
awarded custody, the
court may want to consider which
party has paid attention to the animal's basic daily needs (food, shelter, physical care, exercise, grooming, flea control); who takes the animal to the veterinarian; who provides for social interactions (in the case of dogs) with other dogs and / or with people; who maintains appropriate supervision to assure that state and local regulations are complied with (licensing, not allowing the dog to run free and protecting against circumstances that would endanger her life or health); and who has the greatest ability to financially support the animal.
Courts are beginning to reject a strict property analysis and consider the best interests of the animal in deciding which
party will be
awarded custody.
The decision rendered by the arbitrator will be binding upon the
parties hereto, and any judgment upon the
award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any
court having jurisdiction thereof.
The
court reasoned that the wording of the arbitration agreement had not made it clear that the
parties regarded the venue as critically important.898 The
courts of the United States have similarly considered that the «appropriate standard of review would be to set aside an
award based on a procedural violation only if such violation caused substantial prejudice to the complaining
party.»
The losing
party once again filed for the setting aside of the
award, this time alleging that the tribunal had not observed the decision of the
court rendered during the first setting aside proceedings and, moreover, this led the tribunal to overlook the limitation periods included in Polish law.
Both Wiley and Kirtsaeng proposed that the
Court provide guidance to district
courts in order to direct their discretion in determining whether to
award attorney's fees to a prevailing
party «towar [d] the purposes of the Copyright Act,» which the
Court articulates as «enriching the general public through access to creative works» and «enhancing the probability that both creators and users... will enjoy the substantive rights» provided by the Copyright Act.
The
court may
award either joint or sole custody in a case, based upon the best interest of the child, and may also
award visitation rights to a
party.
As Director of Arbitration and ADR, North America, for the ICC International
Court of Arbitration, she advised North American companies, law firms and
parties on all phases of ICC arbitration, including negotiating and drafting arbitration clauses, substantive and procedural rules for filing requests for arbitration before the ICC
Court, and enforcement of arbitration
awards
If the conduct of a
party is such as to warrant rebuke by the
Court, then the unsuccessful
party runs a significant risk of having special costs
awarded against him or her.
Authors and
courts have also considered whether article V (1)(c) provides grounds for refusing to recognize or enforce where the arbitrator's decision goes beyond the
parties» pleadings or prayers for relief to render an
award ultra petita.
In the few cases where
courts have refused to enforce
awards pursuant to article V (1)(d), the manner in which the tribunal was constituted materially deviated from the
parties» agreement.
A spouse may be
awarded alimony after the
court considers factors like the financial status of both spouses, whether the
parties are able to support themselves, the time and expense necessary for either spouse to receive job or educational training, and the standard of living and duration of the marriage.
After describing «fee
awards [as] a double - edged sword» that «increase the reward for a victory — but also enhance the penalty for a defeat,» the
Court concluded that favoring
awards in close cases would likely discourage
parties from litigating those cases by raising the stakes in suits where the outcome was already uncertain.
The
court found that neither
party had any complete success on the appeal, and held that the beneficiary and the executrix beneficiary should be
awarded special costs to be paid out of the estate.
If the
court does not wish to punish a
party on the basis of full indemnity for costs, it may still
award a certain percentage of special costs.
The
parties also irrevocably waive their rights to any form of appeal, review or recourse to any State
court or other judicial authority with respect to such
Award insofar as such waiver may be validly made.»
For instance, the Hong Kong Supreme
Court enforced an
award rendered in China, even though its members were selected from a different list of arbitrators than provided in the
parties» agreement.880
Siding with the Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits, the Supreme
Court held a federal court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to awarding the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the misconduct or — put another way — to the fees that party would not have incurred but for the bad f
Court held a federal
court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to awarding the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the misconduct or — put another way — to the fees that party would not have incurred but for the bad f
court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to
awarding the fees the innocent
party incurred solely because of the misconduct or — put another way — to the fees that
party would not have incurred but for the bad faith.
The
court ultimately rejected this challenge because the arbitral
award, though mentioning other
parties who were not bound by the arbitration agreement, did not make any
award in their favour or any determination with respect to the rights of those
parties.820
a) Would there be a similar provision as under Scottish Legal Aid legislation (Section 18 (2) of the LEGAL AID (SCOTLAND) ACT 1986) «The liability of a legally assisted person under an
award of expenses in any proceedings shall not exceed the amount (if any) which in the opinion of the
court of or tribunal making the
award is a reasonable one for him to pay, having regarding to all the circumstances including the means of all
parties and their conduct in connection with the dispute».
For instance, in a 1968 case, a Swiss
court refused to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first award but not a second award made with respect to the same dis
court refused to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the
parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme
Court enforced a first award but not a second award made with respect to the same dis
Court enforced a first
award but not a second
award made with respect to the same dispute.
Section 505 provides that a district
court «may...
award a reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing
party» in a copyright action.
The
court had instructed the jury,» [I] f the medical, hospital, rehabilitation, or physical therapy expenses were paid by a third
party such as a medical insurance company or a health maintenance organization, that
party can seek reimbursement from any amount paid from any judgment you may
award.»
Courts have consistently confirmed this in relation to article V (1)(c).837 For example, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a party's attempt to raise a challenge under article V (1)(c) to oppose an order compelling arbitration, that is, before the arbitral proceedings had even taken place.838 The court noted that the provision could only be invoked by a party opposing enforcement of an award, which was not possible in circumstances where no award had been issued, and also unlikely where the party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral award absent any counterclaim
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a
party's attempt to raise a challenge under article V (1)(c) to oppose an order compelling arbitration, that is, before the arbitral proceedings had even taken place.838 The
court noted that the provision could only be invoked by a party opposing enforcement of an award, which was not possible in circumstances where no award had been issued, and also unlikely where the party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral award absent any counterclaim
court noted that the provision could only be invoked by a
party opposing enforcement of an
award, which was not possible in circumstances where no
award had been issued, and also unlikely where the
party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the
party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral
award absent any counterclaims.839
Counsel would be well advised to ask for special costs, or increased costs, where the nature of the case, or the conduct of the
parties, might lead the
court to exercise its discretion to
award same.