The law books are full of
court cases like the ones where the swimming pool or the septic bed was built on the land next door, where the new house was constructed on the wrong lot, where a buyer had to pay $ 129,000 to get a right of way to the property and where fences and retaining walls were built some distance from the actual lot boundary.
You can look up Supreme
Court cases like Goldberg v Kelly and Matthew v Eldridge to start learning more.
It has also served as the basis for such critical Supreme
Court cases like Brown v. Board of Education (barring racial segregation in education) and Loving v. Virginia (striking down laws against interracial marriage).
After making my predictions, I thought it would be cool if Vegas took bets on Supreme
Court cases like they do on sporting events.
While it's typically used in
court cases like divorces, it's a handy tool for laying out your legal rights and responsibilities in any number of situations, including business transactions.
The Act barred both free and enslaved blacks from the rights of citizenship, laid the foundation for the 1857 Dred Scott Decision, and triggered more than a century of Supreme
Court cases like Takao Ozawa v. United States (1922), where Ozawa argued that as a Japanese man, he was white.
The CT reformers have been salivating for
a court case like this in Connecticut.
Not exact matches
The
case could still go to trial, but Irwindale officials would
like to see a settlement outside
court and do not want to shut down Sriracha altogether, City Attorney Fred Galante told the Los Angeles Times (http://lat.ms/17SSD2h).
The
case and others
like it pending in lower
courts raise questions about how much companies protect the privacy rights of their customers.
Meanwhile, other big digital newcomers to the media scene, including BuzzFeed and Business Insider, have also been slow to take up the public interest banner long carried by the
likes of the New York Times and the Press - Enterprise (a small California paper that, as Liptak explained, took two free speech
cases all the way to the Supreme
Court in the 1980s).
Hwang is the co-founder of FiscalNote, a startup that uses data from things
like congressional regulations and
court rulings to predict future legislation and
court cases.
But the revelation this week that Mr. Thiel was covertly backing Mr. Bollea's
case as well as others has raised a series of new questions about the First Amendment as well as about the role of big money in the
court system — specifically the emerging field of litigation finance, in which third parties
like hedge funds and investment firms pay for other people's lawsuits.
Preparing is
like getting ready for a
court case, many supervisors say: To avoid losing good members of their teams — which could spell doom — they must come armed with paper trails to defend the wrongfully accused and incriminate members of competing groups.
She said that while arbitration bars customers from pursuing class - action
cases, it doesn't block them from other legal venues
like small claims
court.
The company was hauled into Canadian
court because of hyped - up claims,
like «bottled water is the most environmentally responsible consumer product in the world» - a classic and transparent
case of greenwashing.
«Giving customers back their right to take Wells Fargo to
court gives them the power to ensure they are made whole and helps prevent
cases like this in the future,» he said.
Let's hope that when the Supreme
Court hears oral arguments on the
case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people
like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules against the rest of us.
Like a
court case, how important is it to have all the facts before determining the judgement?
It's
like there's a
court case over who shot the other person first.
Courts still decide
cases like this.
If it doesn't check out, you should try and refine the understanding, compare more, dig deeper, adjust...
Like in a
court case.
Same thing with lawyer who won't take
cases, decides to live
like a criminial and won't go to
court.
«Same thing with lawyer who won't take
cases, decides to live
like a criminal and won't go to
court.»
Like a jury in a
court case listening to witnesses, we should ask if politicians in their tweets are telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth (or as much as you can in 280 characters).
Saving the Constitution from the
Courts By William Gangi University of Oklahoma Press, 326 pages, $ 45
Cases like Roe, Casey, and the recent Romer decision remind us of the degree to which constitutional interpretation has been supplanted by judicial lawmaking.
Instead of wasting a ton of money and time on a stupid
court case, why not use it for something more meaningful
like feed the hungry!
You are a real azz this is the way the gay agenda went forward you can trace this is one there is a
court case associated with it so you may not
like it but its truth which I know you cant accept.
Repressed memories are NOT 100 % accurate or valid in
court and
cases like these are the reason a statute of limitation should apply.
It's very emotional
like waiting for the lotto numbers or the verdict for a high profile
court case.
We saw
cases like McCleskey in 1987 where the
Court upheld the death penalty despite overwhelming evidence of racial bias.
The Washington Post reported that the Justice Department requested on Monday that a federal appeals
court continue to negotiate with Christian schools
like East Texas Baptist University, Houston Baptist University, and Westminster Theological Seminary for another two months, rather than dropping their
case and allowing the schools to continue to not offer contraception coverage per a lower
court decision.
In the Roman
case, Coontz isn't entirely wrong in calling it a contract, insofar as marriage law would more often than not be adjudicated in the civil
courts just
like a contract law.
Probably in consequence of
cases like this, Paul goes on in I Corinthians 6 to give instructions for the setting up of Christian judges and Christian
courts (following Jewish models).
There have been shady
cases «out oftown» at tracks
like Florida Downs and Hazel Park and at those nasty placesup in New England that seem to
court trouble.
As noted by The Express though, all is not well currently as he continues to fight a
court case for alleged tax fraud, and he has conceded that he would
like to return to England.
Who is David Boies: Boies is a high - profile lawyer who has taken up issues
like gay marriage and even argued the Bush v. Gore recount
case in front of the U.S. Supreme
Court.
I do not think he is corrupt (at the moment) but from my point of view it certainly looks
like bias.Also I doubt he would want to take the point many people are making (that he cheated) into a
court and open what would be a very public discussion.Irrespective of the result the ramifications of such a
case would be far reaching indeed and would maybe result in a fair system where footballers and not referees affect the outcome of football matches.
Cases like Patric's and Miller's, which involve fathers who never married the mothers, are relatively new to the
courts, but divorce
courts have a long history of trying to keep up with changing gender dynamics.
The
courts should have to look at the individual circumstances of each
case, paying attention to things
like: which parent does the caretaking (or both), the temperament of the child, apparent bond of the child to each parent, and anything else that may be relevant and rule in a way that would be least disruptive to the child.
Like other child custody decisions,
courts use the best interest of the child to decide disputed child visitation or custody
cases involving unmarried fathers.
«One could understand why Wyeth would avoid a scandal of monstrous proportions
like this that may prejudice its
case before the Supreme
Court.»
The group say regardless of today's verdict in
court, they will continue to fight to highlight the
case of this family and the many
like them who have been turfed out of their homes.
Automatic removal of the name of a registered voter, who lawfully and legally registered to vote, using an ID Card that the Supreme
Court has confirmed was legal to use at the time she registered, is
like a dictatorial government divesting citizens of their rights, in this
case, the right to vote enshrined in Article 42 of our Constitution, without due process.
Mayoral hopeful Bo Dietl said he knew he'd lose his
court bid to run as Democrat when he saw the Supreme Court judge who decided the case — and she «looked like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane Mc
court bid to run as Democrat when he saw the Supreme
Court judge who decided the case — and she «looked like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane Mc
Court judge who decided the
case — and she «looked
like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane McCray.
Attorneys representing former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, who was also convicted, along with his son Adam, on corruption charges, have —
like Silver's lawyers — used the U.S. Supreme
Court decision in the
case of former Gov. Bob McDonald to appeal the conviction of the ex-Long Island Republican lawmaker.
Former city Correction Commissioner Martin Horn has,
like Mark - Viverito, championed proposals to drive down Rikers» population by diverting the mentally ill and expediting
court cases to speed pretrial detainees through the criminal justice process.
Prosecutors said
like Silver, Skelos will not be saved by the Supreme
Court ruling, and he should head to prison while he appeals his
case.
The
case law regarding aerial surveillance was settled decades ago when the Supreme
Court ruled that viewing objects in plain view from the air but not the ground (
like a marijuana patch hidden behind a high wall) did not constitute a «search» that cops need a warrant to perform.
In that
case, the
court found that governments could not force workers to pay for «ideological» political work by unions that is not related to things
like contract negotiations.
Maybe because it sounded
like most of the other
court cases, few took notice of the Catskill Heritage Alliance losing again in state Supreme Court in its quest to delay or defeat plans to build a mega-resort at Belle
court cases, few took notice of the Catskill Heritage Alliance losing again in state Supreme
Court in its quest to delay or defeat plans to build a mega-resort at Belle
Court in its quest to delay or defeat plans to build a mega-resort at Belleayre.