Sentences with phrase «court cases so»

Your attorney mediator should be active in family law court cases so that he or she has the experience to advise you about the law and expected court rulings.

A new tool launched this week lets you visualize lines of Supreme Court cases so that you can better analyze and study them.

We need to hurry up with these court cases so that this one can get married in whatever state he lands a pro job in... [youtube = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag6k5eEYnSI&w=640&h=390]

Not exact matches

Yet so far, there haven't been many court cases involving crowdfunding.

So what we have now isn't just a single case, but an orchestrated attack on Gawker via multiple court cases, designed to bankrupt the company.

In 2015, 54 such cases were filed in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell case).

Apple's response is complicated, made more so because it includes Constitutional arguments (First and Fifth Amendment) that it will need if the case goes to the Supreme Court.

Not since the 1960s has the Supreme Court heard so many high - profile patent cases.

Lower courts let stand previous case law that allow public unions to do so.

When I was working on it from 1974 to 1994, it did not cross my mind that a legal case that would end up in the Supreme Court would be the consequence of my work and I'm so gratified that it was a unanimous decision.»

Both Hebert and Park said they would be surprised if the court were to rule differently in the two cases since they are so similar.

I wanted to make a body camera that can record an officer's day [so] complaints get settled quicker, court cases get won faster, and the cameras can eliminate all ambiguity.»

And I learned about the wristband, and I decided, yeah, this isn't going to end too well, so I should proceed with a court case instead of trying to reason with the district because they were not listening at all.

Analysts at BofA Merrill Lynch said in a note Thursday that Aereo appears to be attempting to force the case back to the high court so it can find a way of paying some smaller fees for content.

Part of what makes fair use cases so difficult is that there are multiple factors a court has to consider: One is the nature of the work (i.e., whether it is a commercial work), the second is the purpose of the use — specifically, whether it is «transformative» — the third is the amount of the original work used, and the fourth is the effect of the use on the market for the original product.

On April 12, 2018, in a telephone conference to discuss the letter he submitted the day before, defendant Patrick McDonnell requested that the court extend the deadline for answering the CFTC's complaint so that he may confer with the Federal Pro Bono Clinic, rather than simply letting the case go into default.

However, proving that price manipulation occurred can be challenging in the commodities markets, said Professor Verstein, so the CFTC sometimes settles cases rather than letting them play out in the courts.

«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene in the multiple cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary Rule» in district courts around the country, in appeals in two other circuits courts, and in this appeal, which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.

So too is our state, and so far, we've won 5/5 court cases against our very own PresidenSo too is our state, and so far, we've won 5/5 court cases against our very own Presidenso far, we've won 5/5 court cases against our very own President.

So, basically, the vast majority of evidence suggests that you can't use this «loophole» for 2017; however, there is a small minority view / some small amount of belief that this treatment would work for 2017 taxes and it is worth noting that I'm unaware of any court cases directly testing this approach.

Not as an act of kindness from the administration but because the pace of removals is limited by the court system, which can only process so many cases per year.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

One need not be a historian of education or a theologian to assess the damage done to public education and then to society in general by how these cases were decided and what public school officials were empowered to do (or so they believed) despite the clearly given cautions from the Supreme Court itself.

Judge Rothstein conveniently ignored the fact that virtually all states forbade assisted suicide, either by express statute or well - settled common law precedent» which fact the Supreme Court noted without reservation in the one case it has heard dealing, albeit peripherally, with a so - called «right to die.»

Ofsted has recommended schools for prosecution but so far, no cases have come to court.

I have also filed a complaint against Tony Jones» attorney and the family court judge (is she the attorney's former law partner and if so why didn't she recuse herself from this case?).

Funny that the Denver shooter was in court and NO ONE EVER MENTIONED IF HIS CHRISTIAN OR ANY OTHER FAITH... I swear if his name was Mohammad than the whole country would be in flames... BUT he was mentally ill so it was justified and the case was closed quietly so everyone can go back to what they do since it has no value to the media... OPEN YOUR EYE and ears...

Nothing revealed the radicalism of Roe quite so dramatically as the Court's invalidation of a Nebraska statute prohibiting the grisly procedure known as partial - birth abortion in the case of Stenberg v. Carhart.

A good lawyer will tell you to obey the court, obtain a stay so that you can appeal, but do not jeopardize your case away by becoming guilty of «contempt of court».

Everyone knew these cases would never reach the courts, so I guess the five stones will never be thrown or did he mean $ 5 million aka stones to reach the settlement.

The successful experience of the State of New York with such a law in which hundreds of cases have been adjusted satisfactorily even without recourse to the courts encourages us to believe that the difficulties are not nearly so great as some feared or wanted us to believe.42 It is true that one can easily put too much faith in sheer legislation which may be rendered futile if it is not supported in the community consciousness.

There have been many cases in the courts (e.g., improvements in telephones, tires, fluorescent lamps, flashlight bulbs) in which changes that would have greatly lengthened the life or quality of an article were withheld to promote replacement sales.11 Often patents have been taken out on superior inventions but not used, so that the improvements were completely suppressed and an outmoded product continued.

Every generation, it seems, has its paradigm - defining Supreme Court case: a decision (or series of decisions) that determines the jurisprudential ethos and frames the judicial, political, and academic debate for the next quarter century or so.

So there was not a case that the court forced a church to rent their facilities to two gay men to get married?

You are a real azz this is the way the gay agenda went forward you can trace this is one there is a court case associated with it so you may not like it but its truth which I know you cant accept.

So the court will hear cases involving violations of humans rights depicted in Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms from most of the countries in the Europe, regardless of their relationship with the EU.

The cause of the choir's mournful tune is the Supreme Court's decision in the so - called peyote case, Employment Division v. Smith.

So in the wake of the Supreme Court cases, which have many people up in arms on all sides of the issue, let's remember the witness of Jesus that announces no one is excluded from God's radical grace.

This change in rhetoric that the courts have felt obliged to use is readily illustrated in so - called church - state cases.

It should be emphasized that the vast majority of the Court's cases are unanimous, or nearly so, and that most rulings do not involve hot - button or «culture war» matters.

They are not among the «trivial cases» being taken to court that he refers to in 6:2; on the contrary, he goes so far as to instruct perpetrators to be handed over «to Satan for the destruction of the flesh» (5:5).

There was that Christian Hewlett - Packard employee who was fired for posting anti-gay Bible verses back in 2004, but he was actively protesting the company's new diversity in the workplace strategy, so he lost his court case claim of discrimination.

For Team Shamberg, the victory party as was so often the case on this night was short - lived as they had to head over to Court 2 for a date with 9.

But by the time it settled in 2013, most of the disparities identified in the original court case remained and so had to be addressed as part of the settlement's consent decree.

Senator Lesniak is so confident that we'll see sports betting soon, he has said «Go to the bank on it, because if the Supreme Court takes the case, it will be overturned».

So before you push back and ask the courts to review your case one more time (in the hopes of winning sole custody), consider the unexpected benefits you can expect to enjoy once you all get used to the changes brought on by a joint custody arrangement.

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the role of championing children's best interests in the family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the role of championing children's best interests in the family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the case.

The Illinois Supreme Court, where the third suit was filed, so far has stayed out of the case.

In most cases, a group of unhappy homeowners doesn't have the financial resources to take the matter to court, so they often must settle for making enough noise to gain some accommodations that will lessen the sting of having a water park, a teen center, a bike path or a major grocery store facing their back yards.

The Legislature has approved a report to the state Supreme Court about the so - called McCleary case.