The senior lawyer drew the attention of the court to the 13
court charge against the defendants involving N3.1 B and not N36B and demanded that the court call the EFCC to order in the media trial of the defendants.
Not exact matches
In February, the agency dismissed
charges against six
defendants in the case, according to federal
court records.
The Federal Government had on April 30 filled the new 32 amended count
charges to replace the initial 18 count
charges brought
against 5
defendants in 2015 before the same
court.
«It is my decision that this
court has jurisdiction on the
charges filed
against the first
defendant in this case and the notice of preliminary objection is dismissed,» Justice Solebo ruled.
Daniel C. Oliverio, Ciminelli's defense attorney, argued to the judge along with the other defense attorneys for a quick turnaround for the
defendants» next
court appearance, saying they are eager to defend
against the
charges.
The Howard League campaigned
against the criminal
courts charge, which required
defendants who were convicted of a crime to pay fees ranging from # 150 to # 1,200 towards the cost of their case.
The defence team had also hinted the
court that they had an application challenging the competence of the
charges against the
defendants.
The first
Defendant (Badeh) pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against him, while the court relied on Section 478 of the Criminal Justice Act to enter a «not guilty» plea for the second defendant which is a cor
Defendant (Badeh) pleaded not guilty to the
charges preferred
against him, while the
court relied on Section 478 of the Criminal Justice Act to enter a «not guilty» plea for the second
defendant which is a cor
defendant which is a corporation.
The Attorney General reminds that
charges against the
defendants are accusations and the
defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a
court of law.
«The
defendant's motion relies on distortions and omissions, disregards the law and is a transparent attempt to distract this
Court and the public from the serious
charges brought
against the
defendant.
Adv. Rep. 6 (Arizona
Court of Appeal): P1 The State appeals the dismissal of an aggravated assault
charge against David Rodney Schaffer («
Defendant»).
Also argues that even if the
Court agrees the evidence of payment from a government insurer should be excluded, it should allow for an offset of the phantom damages
against the plaintiff's compensatory damages aware, or otherwise allow the
defendant to introduce evidence of the provider's willingness to discount
charges for other patients.
A
defendant learns first learns of the
charges being brought
against him at an arraignment before a district
court judge or magistrate.
A written statement of the
charges against a
defendant sent for trial to the Crown
Court, and signed by an officer of the
Court
Thus, the
court held that the
defendant had notice of the
charges against her.