Sentences with phrase «court decisions dating»

Not exact matches

The retrial in Italy wouldn't start until 2014, the date of which would be set after the top court explains its decision in the next three months.

A judge overturned the conviction and said that Dassey should be «released from custody unless, within 90 days of the date of this decision, the State initiates proceedings to retry him,» according to court documents.

Olson also invoked «fundamental rights» and was queried by Justice Scalia as to just exactly when it became unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage: 1791 with the Bill of Rights, 1868 with the 14th Amendment, or some other date, perhaps after the Court declined in 1971 to review a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding opposite - sex marriage requirements?

We should support the recent decision to bring up to date our dues to the UN, which are several years in arrears, and we should place ourselves once again under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.

If Silver is to appeal that decision, the date he must report to prison is moved back another 14 days from when that court rules, or Oct. 27, whichever is later.

Other examples would include Moos and McClure (where the Court of Appeal overturned the only successful kettling case to date) and the admittedly contentious decision in Abdul v DPP - the conviction under section five of the Public Order Act 1986 of those protesting in fairly vituperative terms («baby killers», «rapists», «murderers» etc) about the war in Iraq at a homecoming for British troops.

The NASUWT has today received formal notification from the High Court of the hearing date for its application for judicial review of the Coalition Government's decision to change the index - linking of public service workers» pensions, including teachers» pensions, from the Retail Price Index (RPI) to Consumer Price Index (CPI).

«Take notice that the appellant being dissatisfied with the decision of the governorship election tribunal for Rivers state, sitting in Abuja, contained in the judgment of the tribunal coram Hon. Justice Suleiman Ambursa (chairman), Hon. Justice Wesley Ibrahim Leha (member) and Hon. Justice Bayo Taiwo (member)(sitting in court no. 23 of the FCT high court dated the 24th of October 2015, doth hereby appeal to the court of appeal upon the grounds set out in paragraph 3 and will at the hearing seek the reliefs set out in paragraph 4,» the statement read.

«It is respectfully submitted therefore My Lord, that on the basis of the grounds argued above, of Lack of, or Excess of Jurisdiction, Procedural Irregularity and breach of the rules of natural justice it is submitted that the decision of the National Disciplinary Committee dated 2nd December, 2015 and endorsed by the National Executive Committee on 10th December 2015 be brought up to this court for purposes of having same quashed.»

Currently, the state and congressional primaries are split in New York state because of a 2012 court decision that set the congressional primary date for the fourth Tuesday in June.

A state Supreme Court justice found late yesterday that Republican primary challenger Philip Pidot has enough signatures to qualify for a GOP congressional primary against Sen. Jack Martins, but will not issue a formal decision until today on the ultimate fate of a primary, which would either be held Tuesday or a at later date.

``... Accordingly, by this court's separate decision, order, and judgment, dated April 12, 2012, the petition has been denied, and this court has declared that the formula prescribed in article III, § 4 of the New York Constitution does not forbid New York from increasing the size of the New York State Senate to 63 seats in 2012.»

«The court fully recognizes that a permanent primary date is best left to New York, but has acted as it must to preserve federally protected voting rights,» Sharpe wrote in the decision.

In her decision, dated July 29, 2008, Westchester State Supreme Court Judge Joan Lefkowitz agreed with the union, ruling, «plaintiffs» health insurance benefits in the prior collective bargaining agreements survived those agreements and may not be diminished without their consent.»

The Supreme Court has abridged the date for the hearing of an application filed by Ghana's Electoral Commission (EC) challenging a high court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential Court has abridged the date for the hearing of an application filed by Ghana's Electoral Commission (EC) challenging a high court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential court decision which overturned its disqualification of flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Ndoum from the December 7 presidential race.

The application is not asking for indefinite adjournment, but an adjournment to a specific date occasioned by the decision of the Supreme Court.»

According to a statement signed by National Commissioner Mohammed Haruna, a Member of the Commission's Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC) and dated 12th September, the decision followed the judgment delivered by Justice Nnamdi Dimgba of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division on 11th September.

A candidate reported by an election court as personally guilty of an illegal practice is required to vacate their seat in the House of Commons as from the date of the court's decision (Friday 5 November).

A declaration that by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of Benjamin Eyi Mensah v Electoral Commission and Anor dated 27/02/15 Carlos Ahenkorah was not a registered voter of the Tema West Constituency at the time he contested the NPP's parliamentary primaries in the Tema West Constituency.

In a decision dated Feb. 5, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Joan Madden ordered a new hearing on a 2013 jury verdict in her court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the Court Justice Joan Madden ordered a new hearing on a 2013 jury verdict in her court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the time.

The ball is in your court and entire decision lies on you to choose any boy / girl whose profile interests you to date.

A recent US court case decision says that dating app Grindr is not liable for an underage sexual encounter that happened between its users.

Instead, they are decisions from various Pennsylvania courts, dating from the colonial period and the first decade after independence.

Interracial marriage in the United States has been fully legal in all U.S. states since the 1967 Supreme Court decision that deemed anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional, with many states choosing to legalize interracial marriage at much earlier dates.

One day, we'll be able to watch the film without associating it with voter identification laws, a Supreme Court decision that put an arbitrary expiration date on racial discrimination, and a string of highly publicized and questionable police killings.

The recent Supreme Court decision on gay marriage makes Peter Sollett's film feel timely, not dated

«By declining to review the Wisconsin ruling, the Supreme Court leaves intact the most definitive court decision to date, which solidly supports the constitutionaliCourt leaves intact the most definitive court decision to date, which solidly supports the constitutionalicourt decision to date, which solidly supports the constitutionality...

How court decisions are dated given long and repeated legal involvement in many states; how the spending reaction to court decisions is measured; whether the court decisions are unrelated to the character of schools before court involvement; and how court - mandated spending differs from other increased spending are a few of the details.

On May 20, 2016, the Treasurer files a motion with Nevada Supreme Court requesting an expedited oral argument date of June 6 or 7 and decision by July 8.

The state supreme court has 60 days from the date of filing to make a decision if they will hear the case, plus the option of a 30 - day extension, Lipshutz said.

Should this occur, the judgment appears on your credit report for seven years from the date the court entered its decision in the public record.

Following some lengthy analysis of the facts and the previous decisions in the case, the district court «concludes that defendants are liable for breaching their fiduciary obligations and are liable beginning on August 16, 2001 — or for three funds the later date institutional share classes become available — for the actual loss in excessive fees paid and for the lost investment opportunity of this breach.»

You have 14 days from the date of the DAS Administrator's review decision to register your appeal at the sheriff court.

The original consultation document notes that «dating sites, sites that re-post court and tribunal decisions, and, overwhelmingly, the so - called revenge and shaming sites» account for «over half of complaints and inquiries the OPCC has received to date about non-consensual posting of personal information.»

48 2016-02-08 Ottawa Reasons and Order dated 08 - FEB - 2016 rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice Russell Matter considered with personal appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc.

A recent decision of the Federal Court in Novartis v Teva 2013 FC 283 («Novartis»)[under appeal A-123-13] has established that the relevant date for patent sufficiency is not until the publication date.

Instead, they are decisions from various Pennsylvania courts, dating from the colonial period and the first decade after Independence.

To date, in Canada, most court decisions regarding third party funding have involved class actions.

The party that loses the judicial review can appeal the decision to the BC Court of Appeal within thirty days from the date the court issues its oCourt of Appeal within thirty days from the date the court issues its ocourt issues its order.

Ideally, a great legal malpractice attorney will stay up to date with legislation and court decision, and he will advise a client about possible changes in the future.

It is, in fact, impossible to find the reasons for judgment of the Court of Appeal, using this style of cause, on either the Court's own website (even when you know the date of the decision) or through CanLII — or, for that matter QL or WestLaw.

In the example you gave, you can enter the Supreme Court file number in the Supreme Court case information database to get the docket entries, which will give you the date of the CA decision and the file number.

The planned implementation date of 1 April 2013 has been public knowledge since at least July 2012 — it was certainly in the minds of the Court of Appeal when it delivered the initial decision in Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039, [2012] All ER (D) 335 (Jul).

The original consultation document notes that «dating sites, sites that re-post court and tribunal decisions, and, overwhelmingly, the so - called... [more]

The use of such expressions usually means that the publisher does not know for certain, or is unwilling to say whether a database includes every judgment or decision decided by the specific court, board or tribunal from a specific date.

In Alberta, for example, a project undertaken in partnership with the law foundation and the Alberta courts has resulted in the availability of Queen's Bench decisions dating to 1971 and Appeal decisions to 1982 (as of today — but check again next week when the Appeal collection is further expanded to an even earlier date).

The court announced its decision in a per curiam opinion dated March 8.

The cards... guide straight to the case; they give, at a glance, the date of its decision and the Court which decided it; where else it is to be found, and what, roughly, it is about; what principle of law it decided, and how the point arose for decision; prior cases on the same point and how they were dealt with in this case; and, finally, the subsequent history of the case and of the decision which was given it.

The judge stated that the court had jurisdiction to grant a release «entirely or conditionally» and referred to the recent decision of HHJ Pelling QC in Hayes v Hayes [2012] EWHC 1240 (Ch) as being the only authority to date in which the scope of the discretion had been considered.

Of these two took between nine months and one year from the date of the New Zealand Appeal Court decision; thirteen between one year and two years; thirteen over two years.