Sentences with phrase «court decisions she finds»

A year later members of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a bill that would strip federal protections from wolves in the Great Lakes region and Wyoming with language preventing any further judicial review — overruling two court decisions finding that the Fish and Wildlife Service had wrongly removed Endangered Species Act protections for the wolf.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week let stand a lower - court decision finding that Arizona school districts could be sued for damages in federal court, in a case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to students.

The WSJ Juggle Blog reports on an Ohio Supreme Court decision finding that a company that fired a female employee who took unscheduled breaks from work to pump breast milk did not violate Ohio's pregnancy discrimination or sex discrimination laws.

She will also discuss other court decisions she finds of interest, as well as interesting developments in -LSB-...]

A recent landmark UK High Court decision found the supermarket chain Morrisons vicariously liable...

In 2016, MAIP and the UBIPC successfully stopped an attempt to undo a court decision finding that the state did not have the right to appeal when a defendant won a Writ of Actual Innocence.

Recent court decisions find the courts relying more and more on the treating health professionals.

She will also discuss other court decisions she finds of interest, as well as interesting developments in science and technology and their intersections with law.

In a 2016 decision, Ontario's Court of Appeal upheld a Superior Court decision finding Deloitte liable in negligence for failing to meet their duties as auditor of Livent Inc. («Livent»).

A recent Court decision found an arguably analogous situation as this to be a trademark violation, among other things, in my opinion under somewhat similar circumstances and a huge damage award was made.

Not exact matches

I find it instructive to look at the specifics of Edwards» predicament, and the curious decision to prosecute in a federal court what was, while morally inexcusable, private behavior involving chiefly the wronging of a spouse.

Generally speaking, lawyers say you should try fighting back now, or at least find a way to delay settling until the summer, when a favorable court decision, as well as pending legislation before Congress that would make trolls responsible for court costs, could work in your favor.

Find out how a recent Supreme Court decision affects your company now and what to expect in the future.

«A criminal defendant, we hold, need not request special interrogatories, nor need he acquiesce in the Government's request for discrete findings by the jury, in order to preserve in full a timely - raised objection to jury instructions,» Justice J. Ginsburg wrote in her explanation of the court's decision.

Catalonia has talked of separation from Spain since the founding of Estat Català — a political movement which began in 1922 - and throughout the 36 - year dictatorship of Franco, however, the resurgence of the pro-secession movement over the past few years is due primarily to Spain's economic woes, a 2010 constitutional court decision to lessen Catalonia's sovereignty, and a distrust of Madrid or the centralized Spanish government.

Judge John D. Bates of the District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision today that found in favor of the Justice Department in its civil antitrust lawsuit to block health insurer Aetna Inc.'s acquisition of rival insurer Humana Inc..

Since the right to fairly priced electricity is not a fundamental constitutional right and because HDL users are not part of a classification that have been subject to governmental discrimination historically, such as race, gender, national origin, etc., the PUD's decision will be allowed to stand unless a court finds that there was no «rational basis» for it.

Particularly in light of the Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which struck down Washington D.C.'s handgun ban and found Americans had an individual right to a firearm — a 5 - 4 decision in which Stevens wrote the primary dissenting opinion — Stevens called the Second Amendment a barrier to «constructive gun control legislation.»

VICTORIA — The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld a B.C. court decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.Court of Canada has upheld a B.C. court decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.court decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.C....

VICTORIA — The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld a B.C. court decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.C. New Democrat Leader John HoCourt of Canada has upheld a B.C. court decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.C. New Democrat Leader John Hocourt decision which found that the Christy Clark government deliberately tried to provoke a strike with B.C. teachers for political gain while leaving children undersupported in overcrowded classrooms, says B.C. New Democrat Leader John Horgan.

In the fisticuffs that is the Supreme Court, the recently retired justice often found himself on the losing side of 5 - 4 decisions.

Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a decision of the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year in the case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.

In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to legalise samesex marriage in 2015, the Exodus approach has found a renewed appeal among some American Christians.

Instead, they set their sights on a court fight with Proposition 8, whereby a majority of voting Californians had amended their state constitution to undo a judicial decision that had found a never before seen right to gay marriage.

Your inklings about the US Supreme Court's upcoming decision concerning Gay Marriage I find rather «random».

Justice Blackmun opined that «this right of privacy, whether it is founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determines, in the Ninth Amendment, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy» (emphasis added).

The Court keeps on going back to Roe as foundational to justify all the other rights that the Court found emanating from that decision.

A fairly typical letter proclaimed, «I believe that the USA was founded as a Nation Under God and has had God «s grace all these years and only when the laws and Supreme Court decisions started to give more power to the secular groups has God «s Grace begun to diminish and soon we will no longer be a blessed nation.»

Archbishop Wesolowski lost his diplomatic immunity after a Vatican court found the accusations proven and removed him from the priesthood — a decision he's now appealing.

Judge Masipa said: «Having regard to the totality of this evidence in this matter, the unanimous decision of this court is the following: on count one, murder... the accused found not guilty and is discharged.

«In light of the unforeseeable changes in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&rCourt,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&rcourt said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.»

Thus in many southern cities private academies, established to circumvent the Supreme Court's decision ordering the end of school segregation, have been founded by churches.

«36 Whether courts are thought to interpret» or to make the law, the fact remains that common law courts find and give reasons for their decisions.

Because the Court found a constitutional guarantee to same - sex marriage, will faith - based institutions be faced with a decision to deny their convictions or lose their tax - exempt status?

It is to the Founding Fathers that the Supreme Court has appealed repeatedly in its decisions.

While we are pleased that the District Court found us likely to succeed on several of our claims, we are nevertheless disappointed by the court's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labelinCourt found us likely to succeed on several of our claims, we are nevertheless disappointed by the court's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labelincourt's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labeling law

Just why five people from Indonesian forest communities now find themselves deep in the Selva Maya is due to a confluence of factors: the resounding success of the forest concessions here in Guatemala, a landmark Indonesian court decision to hand over forest rights to local communities and indigenous groups, and the budding partnership between Guatemala's Association of Community Forests of the Petén (ACOFOP), who is hosting this exchange, and the Indonesia Indigenous People's Alliance (AMAN).

The ACCC has announced it will appeal the Air Cargo cartel decision; the case failed at first instance because the Court found there was no relevant «markt in Australia».

The court, whose decision is final, said in a statement Tuesday that it had examined the cycling union's biological passport program as a part of Caucchioli's case and «found that the strict application of such program could be considered as a reliable means of detecting indirect doping methods.»

After the redistricting plan went to the Supreme Court, only one district was found to be unconstitutionally gerrymandered, a decision that was considered a defeat by several groups.

The Second Circuit found that a new Supreme Court decision narrowing public corruption laws in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell required different instructions than those used by Manhattan U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that there was sufficient evidence to convict the veteran legislator in two corruption schemes, but jury instructions didn't comply with a new Supreme Court decision narrowing the type of acts required of public officials in a quid - pro-quo bribery scheme to formal exercises of government power.

However, the de Blasio administration is entitled to cancel the City's contract with QDG, and to rescind the sale of two acres of Willets Point property already transferred to QDG for $ 1, due to the recent decision of the New York State Court of Appeals which found that QDG's proposed «Willets West» mega-mall on parkland located west of Citi Field stadium can not proceed as it lacks legislative approval.

But what really hurts in this decision is that the Ninth Circuit vacated all of the lower courts finding.

«Although finding that the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision issued after Silver's conviction required a different legal instruction to the jury, the Second Circuit also held that the evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged against Silver, even under the new legal standard.»

The suspended General Secretary disagreed with the findings of the Disciplinary Committee but refused to proceed to court to have the latter overturn the decision.

«Although finding that the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision issued after Silver's conviction required a different legal instruction to the jury, the Second Circuit also held that the evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to prove all the crimes charged against Silver, even under the new legal standard,» Kim's statement reads, in part.

A federal court ruling today found supermarket magnate and Republican mayoral candidate John Catsimitidis violated labor law by failing to pay his employees overtime, upholding an earlier court's decision that the businessman was responsible for the failing to properly compensate employees.

Governor of Abia Okezie Ikpeazu got a relief today as the Court of Appeal in Abuja ruled in his favour setting aside an earlier decision of a Federal High Court which found him guilty of filing false tax returns.

Interestingly enough, because in the US you have the right to appeal to a higher court if you don't like the decision of a lower court, many times states will find very popular gun control bills struck down by a Federal court who tells them that in the pure legal sense, their gun control laws are unconstitutional.