Sentences with phrase «court docket data»

Firms can record all important events associated with their cases, and they can subscribe to court docket data.

Not exact matches

As I reported here when it launched last September, Gavelytics uses artificial intelligence to extract data from court dockets and applies analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on particular matters and in what timeframe.

Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on a specific type of motion or how long they might take to issue a decision.

What they have that others do not are significant databases of secondary legal - research materials such as treatises, specialized legal - research materials in particular areas of concentration, and ever - growing collections of public - records data, court and deposition transcripts, docket information, and all sorts of other information that remains largely unavailable or inaccessible elsewhere online.

It takes data from the federal courts» PACER system — dockets, court filings, orders — and lets users extract information, patterns and trends that would otherwise be invisible.

Like those other modules, the new products liability module uses data derived from court dockets to provide insights and show trends in areas such as case timing, resolutions, findings, and damages for injuries caused by product defects.

These include treatises, specialized legal - research products in particular areas of concentration, and ever - growing collections of public - records data, court and deposition transcripts, docket information, and all sorts of other information that remains largely unavailable or inaccessible elsewhere online.

At some point in the future, Lex Machina will also expand into applying its analytics to data from state court dockets.

In addition to court cases, it may also add docket data, for example, or other kinds of data its customers are interested in.

The data set, available at this website, includes information on, among others, date, the target Member State, the legal domain or subject matter (e.g., competition, environmental protection, free movement of goods), and the official docket number given to the case by the European Court of Justice.

Their Docket Report extracts data from government sources such as Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER), U.S. Patent and Trademark Office databases, and Electronic Data Information Source (EDdata from government sources such as Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER), U.S. Patent and Trademark Office databases, and Electronic Data Information Source (EDData Information Source (EDIS).

While the Lex Machina data is based on existing data from PACER, the federal court system's official electronic filing database, Lex Machina has performed a significant amount of error correction and tagging on top of PACER's docket reports.

Legal analytics involves mining data contained in case documents and docket entries, and then aggregating that data to provide previously unknowable insights into the behavior of the individuals (judges and lawyers), organizations (parties, courts, law firms), and the subjects of lawsuits (such as patents) that populate the litigation ecosystem.

Recently, it has extended the range of data it is mining to include court dockets, enabling new forms insight and prediction.

Performance Profile: Top - performing Court Clerk with hands - on experience in typing, proofreading and distributing opinions and orders providing advice on laws and judicial procedures, recording information in shorthand or peed writing and transcribing data onto docket sheets.