Sentences with phrase «court dress worn»

The survey was carried out after the lord chief justice's announcement in July that court dress worn by judges sitting in civil and family cases would be changed in January 2008.

Not exact matches

Not long after his victory over Court, Riggs got a lot of mileage out of an application to the Virginia Slims tour («since there is no sex after 55 anyway») where he said he would wear a dress if need be.

But then who could possibly care about women who are Willis Reed on the court (Sun guard Lindsay Whalen played Game 1 with a broken bone in her left knee) and Donna Reed off it (McWilliams - Franklin owns three sewing machines and made the dress she wore to Game 1)?

Whether you prefer to wear dainty dresses in the evening, or you're more of a skinny jeans and smart top kind of girl, with a pair of ankle strap pointed court shoes on, the world will quite literally be at your feet.

The ANC party asked Mr Zuma's supporters not to wear its colours outside court on Friday, but many did not follow this advice, and were seen dressed in black, green and yellow.

This dress is my favourite from the collection and can be worn with sandals or sneakers but here I paired it with a classic court shoe and a mini bag.

Featured Photo: Arissa is wearing a lace detail black dress underneath a full skirted black skirt, teamed with simple black heeled court shoes.

Even if I were a marathon runner or Pilates instructor, I still wouldn't be wearing a thigh - revealing skirt or dress anywhere except on the tennis court or by the side of a pool.

It's probably acceptable, but I personally wouldn't wear a non-suiting dress to court (unless I was pregnant).

For non court events I just wore a maternity dress with a non maternity blazer on top.

I mostly wore maternity dresses with my regular blazers to court.

In warmer weather I would wear the dress with either orange sandals or pale grey court shoes and bag for a more neutral theme.

* Coats with shorter sleeve lengths that can be worn with longer gloves * Anything Audrey Hepburn wore * «Court shoes» with substantial heels but no more than 2.5 ″ high * Sheath dresses * Classic Chanel - style suits and jackets * Pearls * Headscarves

When in court, a QC will typically wear a black coat and waistcoat or a simple long - sleeved waistcoat in the style of 18th century court dress.

In a recent opinion in People v. Martinez, Criminal Court Judge Ruben Franco held that» [w] hile most of us may consider it distasteful, and indeed foolish, to wear ones pants so low as to expose the underwear... «people can dress as they please, wear anything, so long as they do not offend public order and decency.»»

The list of no - nos for court attire includes» wearing anything obscene» and «dressing like a prostitute».

A Royal Decree was passed on courts dress — known as the Judges Rules of 1635 — which aimed to regulate the attire worn by judges.

Amongst other things, the court was told that workers had not been provided with health and safety training; fall protection equipment was not provided by the company; the injured worker was wearing dress shoes not safety footwear; the modified platform on the order picker was on an angle and did not have any features to prevent slipping; further safety concerns involving the use of order pickers were observed by the Ministry of Labour following the accident; the MOL was told that the father of a third director would direct workers to work without safety precautions; and there was evidence that an unknown person had attached a safety lanyard to the involved order picker before the Ministry of Labour arrived to investigate the accident.

On such an afternoon some score of members of the High Court of Chancery bar ought to be... engaged in one of the ten thousand stages of an endless cause, tripping one another up on slippery precedents, groping knee - deep in technicalities, running their goat - hair and horse - hair warded heads against walls of words and making a pretence of equity with serious faces, as players might... between the registrar's red table and the silk gowns, with bills, cross-bills, answers, rejoinders, injunctions, affidavits, issues, references to masters, masters» reports, mountains of costly nonsense, piled before them... This is the Court of Chancery, which has its decaying houses and its blighted lands in every shire, which has its worn - out lunatic in every madhouse and its dead in every churchyard, which has its ruined suitor with his slipshod heels and threadbare dress borrowing and begging through the round of every man's acquaintance, which gives to monied might the means abundantly of wearying out the right, which so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope, so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart, that there is not an honourable man among its practitioners who would not give — who does not often give — the warning, «Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here!

Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.&rCourt of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.&rcourt upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»

We have seen the Court of Appeal's rejection of the appeal in the case of British Airways and the employee wanting to wear a cross necklace in defiance of the company's dress code (Eweida v BA plc [2010] EWCA Civ 80, [2010] All ER (D) 144 (Feb)-RRB- and also that court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-Court of Appeal's rejection of the appeal in the case of British Airways and the employee wanting to wear a cross necklace in defiance of the company's dress code (Eweida v BA plc [2010] EWCA Civ 80, [2010] All ER (D) 144 (Feb)-RRB- and also that court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-court's decision in the Buckland case which was widely reported in the press in terms of «Professor wins case about dumbing down university degrees» but which was of much greater legal significance for ridding the law on constructive dismissal of the heresy that the range of reasonable responses test applies to such dismissals, under which the ex-employee could only succeed in showing constructive dismissal if he could prove that the employer's behaviour was so bad that no reasonable employer could possibly have behaved in that way, ie that the employer had not just behaved as too much of an Alan (B'Stard) but as a grade one Olympic standard Alan (Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121, [2010] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)-RRB-.

Solicitors and other non-barrister advocates authorised under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 can wear wigs in court, following a practice direction on court dress handed down by the lord chief justice.

Supreme Court president Lord Phillips has dropped the requirement that barristers and other advocates wear traditional court dress when appearing before the justCourt president Lord Phillips has dropped the requirement that barristers and other advocates wear traditional court dress when appearing before the justcourt dress when appearing before the justices.

Advocates will be free, by prior agreement with the court, to wear no legal dress or to opt for a simple gown.

In the employment context, the crucifix has come into question in recent years, with various courts upholding dress codes that prohibited the wearing of necklaces carrying crucifixes.

Knowing what to wear to court, and dressing appropriately, is an important first step both in getting your voice heard, and persuading the judge to rule in... Read more about Dressing for Success: What to Wear to Cwear to court, and dressing appropriately, is an important first step both in getting your voice heard, and persuading the judge to rule in... Read more about Dressing for Success: What to Wear to court, and dressing appropriately, is an important first step both in getting your voice heard, and persuading the judge to rule in... Read more about Dressing for Success: What to Wear dressing appropriately, is an important first step both in getting your voice heard, and persuading the judge to rule in... Read more about Dressing for Success: What to Wear Dressing for Success: What to Wear to CWear to CourtCourt