Apparently, the government had converted the document to PDF, either to conform to
court filing rules (in my experience, most federal courts require filings in PDF) or, perhaps, in an attempt to scrub the metadata from the document.
Not exact matches
The class action,
filed in United States District
Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
The class action,
filed in United States District
Court, for the District of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
A judge
ruled in favor of the House in 2016, but an appeal
filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the case moved its way through the
courts.
«A
ruling by a single judge in one circuit can not and does not undo the years of clear legal precedent nationwide establishing that transgender students have the right to go to school without being singled out for discrimination,» said a statement from five groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), that have
filed «friend of the
court» briefs on behalf of transgender students.
A U.S. patent
court in 2007 invalidated the company's patent 5126156, basing the
ruling on the fact that Dippin» Dots had sold its product for more than a year prior to
filing its patent application.
In papers being
filed with the state Supreme
Court in Manhattan, the restaurant group likened the
rule to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's failed effort to curb sales of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (473 milliliters).
Johnson & Johnson is seizing upon a U.S. Supreme
Court ruling from Monday limiting where injury lawsuits can be
filed to fight off claims it failed to warn women that talcum powder could cause ovarian cancer.
TV streaming service Aereo
filed for bankruptcy protection after a U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that the company's model violated copyright laws.
In a petition
filed last week, David Elliott and Chris Gillespie asked the Supreme
Court to overturn a
ruling this spring that upheld Google's right to use trademark law to stop them using its name on websites like «GoogleDisney.com» and «GoogleBarackObama.com.»
After the customer
filed a lawsuit that received backing from Northern Ireland's Equalities Commission, lower
courts ruled that the bakery's refusal was discriminatory.
Hanergy Thin Film confirmed the
court ruling in an exchange
filing, and said it had terminated the four independent non-executive directors.
A group of 17 states plan to
file a lawsuit in federal appeals
court challenging the Trump administration's decision to declare vehicle emissions
rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
The 17 states and the District of Columbia
filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's decision in April to declare U.S. vehicle emissions and fuel efficiency
rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
Now, documents
filed in BNY's case in the past few weeks 2014 the
court proceedings begin Monday 2014 provide unprecedented detail about how STARS was crafted at a time when banks and accounting firms were offering deals for multinational corporations to take advantage of loopholes in
rules governing foreign tax credits.
The five lawsuits to block the Department of Labor's fiduciary
rule continued to move forward in July in separate venues, but the Department of Justice strongly defended the
rule in a Washington, D.C., federal district
court challenging the suit
filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities, or NAFA.
The
ruling,
filed on Tuesday in state
court in San Francisco, was the latest in a host of legal and regulatory challenges facing Uber and other highly valued startups in the United States and other countries.
The Department of Justice defended the
rule when it
filed papers in July in a Washington district
court arguing against the case
filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
On July 8, the public got its first view into how the U.S. Department of Labor will defend its fiduciary
rule when it
filed a cross motion for summary judgment, asking the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss a law suit brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
Last week, AARP
filed an appeal of the Fifth Circuit
ruling, while New York, Oregon and California
filed a motion asking the
court for permission to rehear the case in front of the full panel of judges — known as an en banc review.
«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene in the multiple cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary
Rule» in district
courts around the country, in appeals in two other circuits
courts, and in this appeal, which was decided by this
Court more than a month ago,» the
filing said.
Last week, AARP and the State Attorneys General of California, Oregon and New York
filed separate motions to intervene in the case and seek rehearings in front of the full
court, anticipating the DOL would not take action to defend its
rule.
Bell has
filed an appeal in the Federal
Court against the CRTC's
ruling, but it is unlikely the appeal will be heard in time to overturn the Super Bowl ad
ruling for 2017.
The Financial Planning Coalition — comprising the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, the Financial Planning Association and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors —
filed an amicus brief Thursday in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of Texas, in support of DOL's fiduciary
rule and opposing efforts to stop the
rule from taking effect.
The lobbying group will
file an appeal to keep the
rule, which was tossed out by a New Orleans
court last month.
New legislation could allow for injunctions to prevent a troll from
filing a U.S. lawsuit while Canada's Federal
Court rules on whether the Canadian company has infringed on an asserted patent.
The federal judge overseeing the case in Texas against the Department of Labor's fiduciary
rule on Wednesday denied considering all but two of the eight amicus briefs
filed in the
court, allowing only the briefs
filed by the Financial Planning Coalition and the American Association for Justice.
The lawsuit
filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, seeks to set aside and hold unlawful the Environmental Protection Agency's effort to weaken the existing clean car
rules.
On Wednesday, the 2nd District
Court of Appeal overturned that
ruling, deciding that the family had no way of knowing what happened to Arroyo until the pathologist
filed the report.
China's Supreme People's
Court (SPC) Thursday overturned the
rulings in the first and second trials of an administrative lawsuit
filed by Christian Dior Perfumes LLC.
In a
ruling on Tuesday, a federal district
court in Manhattan approved a motion
filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to grant a preliminary injunction and a continued freeze on $ 27 million in assets owned by Andy Andy Altahawi, Dorababu Penumarthi, and Suresh Tammineedi, a trio associated with Longfin Corp..
Ever since the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups began
filing lawsuits to overturn the Labor Department's fiduciary
rule in 2016, legal experts have speculated the issue would ultimately find its way to the Supreme
Court.
And a New York
court ruled that a defamation lawsuit
filed against Trump by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on The Apprentice, may go forward.
The home - rental site
filed a lawsuit Monday (June 27) in federal
court alleging
rules recently passed by the city of San Francisco violate free speech and privacy laws.
Tata Sons has
filed an application to set aside the London
court ruling, arguing it could not pay as India's central bank had denied its request.
As Jason Langley, an attorney with Denver - based Kennedy Childs, argued in one of the briefs he
filed for the defense, the
court «should not overturn the long - standing
rule in Colorado that the term «person,» as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive.
Two Republican representatives in North Carolina
filed a resolution Monday that would permit the state to declare Christianity its official religion and reject any federal laws or
court rulings regarding how the state addresses the establishment of religion.
In an effort to overturn a
ruling by an arbitrator that Washington Redskins wide receiver DeSean Jackson owes super agent Drew Rosenhaus $ 500,000 to repay a loan, Jackson
filed new
court papers.
We are happy to report in response to a lawsuit
filed against the Commonwealth's regulatory use of priority habitat screening to protect endangered species, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court has
ruled unanimously to affirm the state's authority under the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA).
All three parties
filed for custody, but the
court ruled out Cynthia because she did not adopt the child who her then - husband fathered.
But opponents quickly
filed a lawsuit to overturn it, state
courts ordered an injunction, and the law can not go into effect until the Missouri Supreme
Court rules on its legality, probably early next year.
The Supreme
Court will on July 4
rule on an application
filed by businessman Alfred Agbesi Woyome seeking to temporarily halt his oral examination by the Attorney General.
Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High
Court, Abuja has turned down
ruling in the bail application
filed by embattled former chairman of DAAR Communications, Chief Raymond Dokpesi who is currently facing trial bordering on six count charges of violation of Public Procurement laws and money laundering as slammed on him by the Federal Government.
This
ruling was passed after a pressure group, Occupy Ghana
filed a suit against the Auditor General praying the
court to compel them not to only report on financial misappropriations by public officials but to take steps to retrieve all state finances that may have gone into wrong hands.
The
court ruled that the police could not continue to search the
files for evidence of criminal activity.
At the time plaintiff
filed the motion for default judgment in default of defence, the defendants had not been served with any Statement of Claim as required under the
Rules of
Court in support of the amended Writ of Summons to which they could respond by way of a statement of defence.
The Abia State Governor, Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu, has
filed a notice of appeal and application for stay of execution at the
Court of Appeal in Abuja against the
ruling of Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High
Court.
Last month, a State Appellate
Court ruled in favor of two home healthcare workers who
filed suit claiming the 13 - hour
rule violated New York State's minimum wage laws, since they were made available to work 24 - hours a day by being live - in home health workers.
On June 15, Buhari had appealed against a previous
ruling of the
court dismissing his preliminary objection to the suit
filed by Nwokocha - Ahaaiwe, an Abuja based lawyer.
A Federal High
Court in Lagos will on April 23
rule on a suit
filed by ex-President Goodluck Jonathan's cousin, challenging his arrest and detention for alleged N650 million fraud.