Sentences with phrase «court granted review»

The court granted review in April 2016.

The broadcast case was one of eight in which the court granted review on Friday, helping fill out the rest of the argument docket for the current term.

John Muir Health petitioned for review, and the Supreme Court granted review.

The Court granted review in one case and called for the views of the Solicitor General in two cases.

On May 22, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court granted review in the first patent case accepted for the October 2017 term.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted review in 12 cases Friday, including a challenge to the appointment process for administrative law judges at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

It is interesting that the court granted review in the last of these questions because it was not the basis of the 9th Circuit decision now being reviewed by the Supreme Court.

The state supreme court granted review to resolve this split.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted review of the case in 1997.

«COPAA Applauds FDA Ban On Use of Electrical Stimulation Main Supreme Court Grants Review in Fry v. Napoleon»

Supreme Court review was our last chance in the courts — one where the odds were stacked against us because the Supreme Court grants review in so few cases.

Over time, the theory goes, this dynamic has resulted in the Court granting review in fewer cases.

Not exact matches

Even if the court grants a broader review and the case remains in limbo, opponents of the CFPB have begun building the case for removing Cordray anyway.

International passengers arrive at Washington Dulles International Airport after the U.S. Supreme Court granted parts of the Trump administration's emergency request to put its travel ban into effect later in the week pending further judicial review, in Dulles, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2017.

Granting the Supreme Court supremacy in conducting discourse about values through the mechanism of judicial review disempowers the people from full participation in their government and their communities.

Indeed, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court, as presently constituted, would have granted review to such a claim.

Aja Teehan vs HSE is a High Court challenge against the HSE and the Department of Health seeking judicial review of the refusal to grant her a home birth.

Aja Teehan vs HSE is a High Court challenge against the HSE and the Department of Health seeking judicial review of the refusal to grant... Read More

«I inadvertently suggested to you that clause 64 contains a provision for the court to grant permission to proceed with a judicial review where conduct is highly likely to have not made a difference if it considered there were exceptional circumstances to do so.

(Link: https://prnigeria.com/2016/03/yashuaib-resigns-fossra-say-jon-ode-panel-misleading-president-buhari/ May I appeal to Your Excellency to simply review the fact that Sambo Dasuki has been granted bails by three High Courts in Nigeria and that even the ECOWAS Court has also ordered his release yet he has remained in custody.

May I appeal to Your Excellency to simply review the fact that Sambo Dasuki has been granted bails by three High Courts in Nigeria and that even the ECOWAS Court has also ordered his release yet he has remained in custody.

Lawyers of Woyome filed two applications at the Supreme Court praying the court to review the ruling which granted Martin Amidu the permission to orally examine their client a weekCourt praying the court to review the ruling which granted Martin Amidu the permission to orally examine their client a weekcourt to review the ruling which granted Martin Amidu the permission to orally examine their client a week ago.

Cases that may have previously been automatically placed on the Supreme Court's docket by appeals or writs of error could now be reviewed on a writ of certoriari, which could be granted or denied at the court's discreCourt's docket by appeals or writs of error could now be reviewed on a writ of certoriari, which could be granted or denied at the court's discrecourt's discretion.

Grayling claimed that courts would still be able to grant permission for judicial review cases under the new so - called «highly likely» restrictions if there were «exceptional circumstances».

HARLEM — The city's Franchise Concession Review Committee has authorized SPORTIME to enter into negotiations with the Randall's Island Sports Foundation to expand the number of courts on the island — but a local politician says the tennis center shouldn't be granted additional space unless neighbors of all income levels are guaranteed access to it.

Scope has commented after a judge granted a High Court review of Universal Credit in relation to the loss of vital disability premiums.

A lower court's 23 August preliminary injunction halting hESC research «has a profound impact» that «disrupts not only the processing of grant applications currently under review by NIH, but it disrupts many of its currently funded grants, and it has already threatened ongoing programs to educate physicians and physician - researchers,» the brief states.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined last week to review a federal appeals court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took efCourt declined last week to review a federal appeals court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took efcourt's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took effect.

By granting review of its third case in two years involving the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the U.S. Supreme Court has signaled a renewed interest in resolving legal conflicts arising under the federal law that governs services provided to nearly 6.7 million schoolchildren in special education.

If permission to seek a judicial review is granted, then a full two - day court hearing will be held immediately.

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted review of a church - state case that could hold major implications for government aid to religious schools.

Neighborhood Centers appealed that decision to the Texas Supreme Court, which granted review.

The court unanimously granted CCSA's Petition for Review on April 17, 2013, and heard oral argument on February 4, 2015.

(It is a fair assumption that Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., was not in favor of rehearing; in an in - chambers order he issued on an earlier procedural matter in the detainees cases [applications 06A1001 and 06A1002] on April 26, Roberts opined that «possible court action» in the D.C. Circuit Court would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 dencourt action» in the D.C. Circuit Court would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 denCourt would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 denial.)

An Ontario Superior Court justice has found that the class action lawsuit brought against Deloitte LLP by lawyers who had reviewed documents for the firm constituted a success for the plaintiff class, and he has granted the representative plaintiff for the class a cost award.

The court reviewed California's Supreme Court's decision to grant out of scourt reviewed California's Supreme Court's decision to grant out of sCourt's decision to grant out of sta...

If a board is granted considerable discretion under its enabling statute and it is deciding a question within its domain of expertise, its judgment will often be shown deference by the reviewing court.

U.S. Chamber files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to grant review to decide whether the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause applies to the States

- In judicial review cases, legal aid will only be paid for the work carried out if the High Court grants permission for the case to proceed.

The Court of Appeals of Arizona granted review of Anthony Toth, Petitioner - Appellee, v. Gloria Snyder Toth, Respondent - Appellant to consider whether an equitable distribution of marital assets would require that -LSB-...]

Our Supreme Court is very likely to grant further review of Abney for two reasons.

In granting review, the court added the following additional question to be examined:

The husband based his appeal on the court's refusal to reopen the case, its granting the motion to reopen to wife, its awarding GI Bill benefits to the wife, its imputation of income to him, its award of the $ 65,000 to wife, and its refusal to allow him extra time to review the final decree for errors.

The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. John Doe 2010 FC 387 by Hughes, J. concerns a review of a «rolling» Anton Piller order granted by the Federal Court of Canada in a copyright infringement case to an Indian film production company and its Canadian licensee against various un-named persons who (according to the claim) «deal in counterfeit video recordings.»

If the Supreme Court thinks the decision is worth reviewing, it will grant the petition and put the case on its docket.

Justice Kennedy was talking about how law review case comments generally come out too late to be of use to the Court (especially in the context of deciding whether to grant certiorari in a case).

The Divisional Court quashed the application for judicial review on the grounds that it lacked the jurisdiction to grant some of the relief sought and there were complex questions of fact and law that required a trial.

The court will then schedule a final hearing date when they will review the proposed agreement and grant the divorce, for which only one spouse has to attend this final hearing.

An EPO must be scheduled for review in the Court of Queen's Bench no later than nine working days after it is granted to review the information related to the Order.

I probably should have noted this when it came out, but on October 28, 2015 the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Hudson v. Hudson, 414 S.C. 352, 778 S.E. 2d 482 (2015), dismissed as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari it issued to review the Court of Appeals opinion in Hudson v. Hudson, 408 S.C. 76, 757 S.E. 2d 727 (Ct..