Sentences with phrase «court hearing at the time»

You will be given your summons for the court hearing at the time of your application.

Not exact matches

His case illustrates the difficulty of succeeding with such a defense at a time when a Colorado court is preparing to hear similar arguments in the trial over a movie theater shooting in which 12 people were killed.

The Supreme Court denied the state's request to hear the case at the time.

Katz managed Liston for 10 % of his purses, and as the two sat in court at Liston's hearing for the Fairmount Park incident, Liston leaned over to Katz and said, «If I get time, you're entitled to 10 percent of it.»

The suspects however told the court the last time they heard from the lawyer, Augustine Obuor, was before the committal proceedings at the District Court and they also had no access to relatcourt the last time they heard from the lawyer, Augustine Obuor, was before the committal proceedings at the District Court and they also had no access to relatCourt and they also had no access to relations.

The New York Times didn't act with malice when it mistakenly suggested in an editorial that Sarah Palin incited the 2011 shooting of Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords, a lawyer for the paper said in Manhattan federal court yesterday at the first hearing on Palin's defamation suit.

«Yesterday's ruling was a landmark ruling that tells about the fact that our courts are working, rule of law is part of our lives and that our democracy is alive and kicking and that at any point in time we can be confident that we have a court to rely on and that when people feel aggrieved by decisions by an arm of government or a constitutional body, they can always appeal and have hearing and sometimes can have their grievances addressed in their favour.

Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch spoke for the first time at his Senate confirmation hearing, insisting he will — if appointed to the nation's highest bench — strive for independence and integrity.

At a time when the parties are carefully stage managed and when leaders only refer to party members when they are «running against them» to court floating voters there has to be a way for party supporters to have their voices heard.

In a decision dated Feb. 5, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Joan Madden ordered a new hearing on a 2013 jury verdict in her court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the Court Justice Joan Madden ordered a new hearing on a 2013 jury verdict in her court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the court that gave five mesothelioma victims represented by Weitz a total of $ 190 million — the highest award of its kind at the time.

At the resumed hearing, counsel to the defendants, Kanu Agabi (SAN), informed the court of his appearance in the matter for the first time.

At the last hearing on October 20, the court granted an application by the EC to abridge the time for the hearing of the injunction suit from going ahead with the processes to conduct elections in December.

At the last hearing of this case on October 20, the court granted an application by the EC to abridge the time for the hearing of the injunction suit from going ahead with the processes to conduct elections in December.

I have mixed feelings about it, because a part of me thinks it would be a great experience to be selected for a jury but then another part of me was really relieved to not have been chosen both because of the timing (it never seems like I there is a good time to get chosen for jury duty — there's always a critical project at work) and because I am afraid of what I might hear / see during a court case.

The first article titled, «Experts differ on test - based evaluations at NM hearing,» I felt fairly captured the events of the second day in court, but the second article titled, «Professor's testimony: Teacher eval system «not ready for prime time,» did not.

It is the same rhetoric so often heard in education reform: «Just look at how far behind high - schoolers are, compared with Europe, even though we spend two to three times more on them,» says Steve Brill, the journalist who founded Court TV and writes extensively on charter schools.

Aside from some confusing time line issues, at this point we are introduced to some new characters - namely the judge hearing the case and his daughter, and some chapters deal with aspects of their lives that have nothing to do with the court case.

Since the court schedules multiple hearings at the same time, it is possible that you might see someone you know at court.

We have all heard countless stories of the mortgage company promising a modification while at the same time pushing the foreclosure through the court.

Last monday, the judge gave me the kids 100 % of the time because of continued court violations by the ex, pending a hearing at the end of the month.

The suspension of the bylaw's problematic sections is temporary, until a hearing can be held on the merits, at which time the Superior Court will consider the legality of these very sections.

At any rate, the Court has agreed to extend the hearing time, which may or may not indicate a greater degree of interest in the arguments before them.

In Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] 1 All ER 671 and Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] 1 All ER 685, which were heard at the same time, the Supreme Court had to balance the importance of finality in litigation — in both cases the parties had reached agreement on all matters and had obtained consent orders approved by High Court judges (albeit that the order in Sharland had not been sealed); as against a material failure by a party to comply with their duty of disclosure.

Lord Justice Briggs agreed with the other two judges in relation to the Regulations and Guidance, but found that «the defects in the procedures for applying for ECF at the time of the hearing [in the Administrative Court] were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair».

Then, they do not attend the court hearing — because they fear arrest because of their inability to pay the fine, [38] because they are unable to get time off from work, because they are unable to make arrangements for child care for the time they would be at a court, because they do not realize that it is possible to challenge the ticket, even if they believe the ticket was issued unfairly.

[58] At the conclusion of the hearing on March 5, having been made aware that the passage of time was critical because of the potential for the memory of the plaintiff's family computer to be «overwritten» with ongoing use, I directed that within two weeks of that date, an expert engaged by the plaintiff's counsel, at the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this rulinAt the conclusion of the hearing on March 5, having been made aware that the passage of time was critical because of the potential for the memory of the plaintiff's family computer to be «overwritten» with ongoing use, I directed that within two weeks of that date, an expert engaged by the plaintiff's counsel, at the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this rulinat the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this ruling.

Class actions are useful because one judge is able to hear all the complaints at the same time, saving court time and establishing a common resolution for all wronged employees.

This Court of Appeal decision serves as a useful reminder that while in some cases the overriding objective and the obligation for a case to be dealt with proportionately will necessitate a speedy and efficient conclusion, in other cases, such as where a party's liberty is at stake, it is imperative that time is taken by the court to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hearCourt of Appeal decision serves as a useful reminder that while in some cases the overriding objective and the obligation for a case to be dealt with proportionately will necessitate a speedy and efficient conclusion, in other cases, such as where a party's liberty is at stake, it is imperative that time is taken by the court to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hearcourt to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hearings.

There are stats for cases filed, applications for leave submitted, appeals heard, judgments (including number of unanimous vs. split decisions), and average time lapses (time lines in the life of a case at the Court)... [more]

When mom files the contempt motion with the court she will schedule a date for a Show Cause Hearing, at which time dad will need to appear and explain why he should not either pay up or be found in contempt of court.

We then had a hearing before a judge who issued an ruling confirming that I would not be allowed to address the court on this matter at any time.

Quebec Superior Court Justice Michel Girouard is challenging the Canadian Judicial Council's jurisdiction to launch a conduct hearing against him stemming from an allegation he bought illicit drugs at time he was a lawyer.

Stephen George Byrne was head of legal & compliance at Bank of Cyprus UK Limited at the time Bank of Cyprus UK Limited v Menelaou was heard in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Discovery can proceed at any time before trial / hearing on motion with the courts consent, or more typically during the time set forth in a scheduling order.

The court reached its decision after considering newly - discovered evidence of police misconduct obtained through the use of digital forensic technology not available at the time of trial and holding several days of evidentiary hearings.

Unfortunately, the Court of Appeal was unable to complete the hearing at that time and the case has been now rescheduled to November 30 and December 1, 2011.

The issue is not even close to being resolved at the time of this recording and it could take years to go to the Supreme Court and get a final resolve, but there also may be developments by the time you hear this episode.

The court held that the evidence before the adjudicator gave some justification for the conclusion that operations by Iraqi and Iranian agents were likely to be continuing at the time of the hearing, and that the tribunal erred in concluding otherwise.

But she said a more formal summer break like the ones enjoyed by judges at the U.S. and U.K. Supreme Courts is simply not practical in Canada because of a combination of the hearing load, translation time, and other factors.

Singapore courts shall have jurisdiction to hear proceedings for divorce, presumption of death and divorce, judicial separation or nullity of marriage only if either of the parties to the marriage is (a) domiciled in Singapore at the time of the commencement of the proceedings; or (b) habitually resident in Singapore for a period of 3 years immediately preceding the commencement of the proceedings.

The Defender Association is an independent, non-profit corporation, with over 200 full time Assistant Defenders who represent clients in adult and juvenile state courts, at civil and criminal mental health hearings, and as child advocates for dependent and neglected children.

«Yes, hearings can take place on the bill at the same time, but we really should wait to see what the Supreme Court has to say as well.»

Unified Family Court is the handling of all Family Cases involving the same children and families at one hearing, while at the same time resolving family disputes in a fair, timely efficient, and cost effective manner.

At the time, pre-trial court hearings were not recorded.

When a Motion for Modification of Child Custody or Parenting Time is made by a parent of a minor child or children, and if that motion is contested by the other parent, courts will most often appoint a custody evaluator at the first hearing.

The court will also generally hear and resolve at this time any pre-hearing issues that either party might raise.

Mother did not voice any objection at the time of the hearing when the court asked multiple times if there were any additional issues that needed to be discussed and agreed when the judge suggested they «call it a day».

In summary, the JT ruled that at the point of determining Assas» application there was no conflict between the two courts but a conflict of jurisdiction would arise if, at a later time, both courts endeavored to hear the case.

There are stats for cases filed, applications for leave submitted, appeals heard, judgments (including number of unanimous vs. split decisions), and average time lapses (time lines in the life of a case at the Court).

The $ 10,000 figure is based on the argument that at the time of Confederation, section 96 courts could hear civil matters starting at $ 100, and that this figure adjusted for inflation is less than $ 10,000.