Sentences with phrase «court in case of»

In what should put chills in my fellow family law attorneys» spines, on July 2, 2014, a South Carolina family law attorney was publicly reprimanded by the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of In Re.

That was the headline of an article posted earlier this week by the Financial Post (article here,) following the decision of the Ontario Superior Court in the case of BlackBerry Limited v. Marineau - Mes, 2014 ONSC 1790 (CanLII).

His government will have to decide whether to appeal to the Supreme Court in the case of Al Rawi and others v The Security Service and others [2009] EWHC 2959 (QB).

The judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of HSE v Chevron North Sea Limited on 8th February 2018 had been eagerly awaited...

In coming to the conclusion that «International Fashions, GDL and SOS were three components of the same corporate structure» and thus one «common employer» Justice Akhtar, in addition to looking at the facts of the case, relied on what was said by the British Columbia Supreme Court in the case of Sinclair v. Dover Engineering Services Ltd. (1987), 1987 CanLII 2692 (BC SC), 11 B.C.L.R. (2d) 176 (BC SC), affd (1988), 1988 CanLII 3358 (BC CA), 49 D.L.R. (4th) 297 (BC CA), at paragraph 18 of its reasons for decision:

Notable cases in which Pierre was involved included an appeal against deprivation of citizenship on national security grounds following remittal to SIAC by the Supreme Court in the case of Pham («B2»); an appeal concerning registration under the statelessness provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 in the case of MK (India); three out of hours applications for injunctions successfully preventing same - day removal and numerous challenges to Home Office policy and the Immigration Rules.

He has a particular interest in Taxi Licensing having successfully appeared in the High Court in the case of Kaivanpor v Sussex Central Justices (Unreported, Div Ct).

Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court in the case of South Carolina v. United States (Civil Action No. 12 - 203), expressed the opinion of the court that the law enacted by South Carolina «satisfies Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,» making it permissible, but that the short time left before the 2012 elections prohibited its implementation until elections taking place in 2013.

Notably, the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Castle Rock v. Gonzalez came to its conclusion that there was no civil liability of a police department or police officers for failure to enforce a restraining order in the face of language in a state statute whose plain language fairly clearly created a mandatory duty to that effect.

The court in the case of Wheeling Park Commission v. Dattoli determined that the injured man's case against the park was incomplete in that the man failed to submit any evidence regarding the duty the park had to maintain the handrail.

However, if you don't create the prenuptial agreement correctly or you include invalid items, then the entire agreement could be thrown out in court in the case of your divorce.

This question, and the concept of discoverability, were recently discussed by the court in the case of Huang v. Mai which can be read here.

He recently authored an amicus curiae brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in a case of great economic significance to condominiums, in which the right of associations to impose successive liens on owners who withhold condominium fee payments was upheld by the SJC.

By Mclean Ayearst, legal research volunteer and former Legal Network intern January 13, 2016 The Canadian HIV / AIDS Legal Network is part of a coalition which is intervening at the Supreme Court in the case of R. v. Lloyd, the latest challenge to Canada's harsh and damaging drug laws.

The need to be able to explain the purpose of transfers into offshore holding structures was further emphasised by the English Supreme Court in the case of Prest v Petrodel Resources (which will be influential in the many offshore jurisdictions whose legal systems are based on English common law).

Second is today's oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which «concerns the torture of Ogoni leaders in Nigeria, but at stake is the future of the law under which this case was brought, the Alien Tort Statute.»

The Arizona Supreme Court in the case of In Re Marriage of Gove addressed whether a parent can be required to sign a release of his or her medical and psychological records in a child custody case.

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District AFC submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Endrew F., which presents the important question of what makes an education «appropriate» as guaranteed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

Ed School Affiliates Argue for University of Texas Harvard Crimson, October 16, 2012» [Philip] Lee and fellow doctoral student Matthew P. Shaw put that belief into practice in August by filing an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.

The Commission has received a certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Republic vrs.

«It is not Rockson Bukari who is relocating the assembly block, I do not have such powers, it is a ruling of a court in the case of Philip Ayamba vrs the Attorney General in the citing of the assembly's office block.

«Having regard to the settled position of the law as expoused by our courts in not less than five cases wherein the suspension of legislators by legislative houses was annulled and set aside, the Senate should withdraw the appeal filed against the judgment of the Federal High Court in the case of Senator Omo - Agege.

In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.

This decision was reaffirmed in 2008 by Suffolk County Court in the case of Colaiacovo v. Dormer with Judge Gary J. Weber stating, «Simply put, the State of New York and its agencies are no longer in a position to require that a handgun be stored in an inoperable condition or otherwise locked up if it is otherwise legally present in the owner's dwelling.»

Many parents are also adding dispute resolution procedures to their plans, to avoid returning to court in the case of a disagreement.

[15] In addition, the Supreme Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart ruled that Congress may ban certain late - term abortion techniques, «both previability and postviability».

Failing to adhere to these requirements, the S corporation may not prevail in court in the case of a liability action, with the result that the stockholders are severally and individually held to be liable.

can grandparent send a letter or disposition to court in cases of child custody dispute.

The law creates an exception to foreign nations» immunity to lawsuits in U.S. courts in cases of state - sponsored terrorism.

Nationals of the former Yugoslavia as well as, at present, those of Bosnia - Herzegovina were therefore aware, or should have been aware, that they were amenable to the jurisdiction of their national criminal courts in cases of violation of international humanitarian law.

The difference of the jurisdiction in this court in the cases of writs of error to State courts and to Circuit Courts of the United States pointed out, and the mistakes made as to the jurisdiction of this court in the latter case by confounding it with its limited jurisdiction in the former.

Not exact matches

The case is In re: Facebook Inc IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12 - md - 02389.

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

And the Viacom CEO is caught in a Catch - 22 of his own making: Earlier this year, he maintained in a court case launched by the billionaire's former girlfriend that Redstone was fully capable of making decisions.

Mumbai jewellers Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are prime suspects in the case and a special court of India's Central...

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.

The Air Force Court of Appeals in May 2017 also reversed a conviction in the sexual assault case U.S. v. Boyce after finding that public statements by Sens. Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand regarding the «Marines United» scandal earlier this year created «the appearance of unlawful command influence» in the case, as retired Col. Don Christensen, a former Air Force chief prosecutor and current president of the advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, told Task & Purpose at the time.

Gillibrand was endorsed Tuesday by End Citizens United, a political action committee established in 2015 to push back against the results of the 2010 court case.

There's the third, more realistic action, which is you have to get some sort of production order of the data at Uber as evidence in a court case.

In her announcement, Gillibrand criticized the 2010 Supreme Court case, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, which ruled that the government should not regulate the amount of money corporations and unions can spend on campaigns.

GENEVA — Russian billionaire and Chelsea soccer club owner Roman Abramovich has appeared in a Swiss court as part of a 19 - year - old legal case aimed to wrest 46 million Swiss francs in debts allegedly owed by him and others to a European bank.

If people get their news from the president's Twitter (twtr) feed — or in the case of his Supreme Court nominees — via Facebook (fb) Live, what does that mean for journalists and their audiences?

In 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty of being too liberal in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casIn 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty of being too liberal in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casin advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casin fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire case.

In some cases, these retailers were able to come to an agreement with their creditors and restructure their debts without going through bankruptcy court, as the threat of bankruptcy motivates the creditors to negotiate.

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important pair of cases, namely Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius.

Gawker Media founder and CEO Nick Denton will file for personal bankruptcy protection as early as Monday after losing a fight in a Florida court for a shield against a judgment in a breach of privacy case involving professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, according to a person familiar with the matter.

In 2015, 54 such cases were filed in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell caseIn 2015, 54 such cases were filed in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell casein Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell casein that state (including the Dell case).

A judge ruled in favor of the House in 2016, but an appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the case moved its way through the courts.

The court case revealed a series of convoluted legal infractions performed by Amanat and Tuzman in their work with the presently insolvent video - technology company, KIT Digital, a former multi-million dollar leader in the cloud - based video management industry.

The decision by NB Liquor comes just days after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of Gerard Comeau who was fined in 2012 for bringing home cheaper beer and liquor he bought in neighbouring Quebec.