Sentences with phrase «court in child protection cases»

Large increases to application fees could discourage some local authorities making applications to court in child protection cases, hindering attempts to protect vulnerable children like Baby P, lawyers claim.

Not exact matches

This Puerto Rico law provides that, in all cases in which a person is accused of domestic violence or child abuse, the court shall, by petition of party, issue a protection order for the petitioner so that he / she be the sole custodian of the animal.

[14] «Both judges of the Provincial Court (Family Division) and Children's Aid Societies pressed strongly to have the change in appeal procedures applied to child protection cases,» said Thomson.

Some family judges, including many who were now part of the expanded UFC, thought they were better suited than their criminal law counterparts to deal with these young persons and argued that these cases and child protection cases should be in the same court.

Likewise instructing a psychologist to assess neurodevelopment issues of parents in child protection cases, would require experience of working with adults in areas including ASD, ADHD and other specific learning difficulties and have an understanding of the child protection and family court processes.

Plus, an American court in a Hague Convention case won't accept your defense that returning a child to the foreign country will put the child in grave risk of harm unless you can show that the foreign support services are unable to provide the needed protection.

There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.»

«As needed» new courses, many developed with the NJI, included: the first course in Canada designed to teach judges communication skills; a judgment writing course; the first child protection program; courses on managing domestic violence cases; special programs to teach leadership and management skills to judges assuming the administrative roles within the Court; and a «family law primer» for Criminal Court judges who periodically sit in Family Court.

Cases in which courts are asked to enjoin or limit international visitation typically require a judge to consider the extent to which a foreign legal system is likely to provide an abducted child with the necessary protection and to effectively and promptly order the child's return to the child's habitual residence.

In the family law realm, topics have included interviewing children and assessing their credibility, cultural fluency in family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody caseIn the family law realm, topics have included interviewing children and assessing their credibility, cultural fluency in family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein custody cases.

Paul's experience and expertise in this area is in the fields of children's services (support and accommodation under sections 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protectiochildren's services (support and accommodation under sections 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of ProtectioChildren Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protectiochildren under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protection cases.

This was an appeal of a final order in a child protection case made by a judge of the SCJ in Ottawa (where there is a unified family court).

The Provincial Court is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cCourt is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic ccourt in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cases.

Consideration should also be given to whether the reporting or disclosure restrictions will provide sufficient protection from the risk, whether the safety of the parties in cases where the court considers there are particular physical or health risks against which reporting restrictions may be inadequate to afford protection, and the extent to which the court should, of its own motion, take steps to protect the welfare of any vulnerable adult or child who is unrepresented before the court.

Kentucky is one of approximately 20 states that have completely closed proceedings in child - protection cases, according to the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.

She has expertise in child abuse cases having worked as in - house counsel at a Children's Aid Society and having represented parents in court on child protection cases.

BC Provincial Court www.provincialcourt.bc.ca The Provincial Court is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cCourt www.provincialcourt.bc.ca The Provincial Court is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cCourt is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic ccourt in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cases.

Cobb warned: «Equally worrying is in private law children cases, if a judge considers that serious child protection issues arise such that the threshold for a care or supervision order with respect to the child may be satisfied, the court may direct the appropriate authority to undertake an investigation of the child's circumstances under s 37 of the Children Achildren cases, if a judge considers that serious child protection issues arise such that the threshold for a care or supervision order with respect to the child may be satisfied, the court may direct the appropriate authority to undertake an investigation of the child's circumstances under s 37 of the Children AChildren Act 1989.

It is currently a contempt of court to publish a judgment in a family court case involving children or a Court of Protection judgment unless the judgment has been delivered in public or the judge has authorised publicacourt to publish a judgment in a family court case involving children or a Court of Protection judgment unless the judgment has been delivered in public or the judge has authorised publicacourt case involving children or a Court of Protection judgment unless the judgment has been delivered in public or the judge has authorised publicaCourt of Protection judgment unless the judgment has been delivered in public or the judge has authorised publication.

In the Lev Tahor case, when the Chatham - Kent child protection authorities petitioned the Ontario courts to allow them to send the children back to Quebec, the courts at first agreed.

Many, many social workers in child protection cases defy court orders without cause from family court judges and nothing is ever done.

The work responsibilities of the social worker includes writing assessments, conducting interviews to clients and their families to know the type of problem, providing counseling support, recommending best solutions ion particular cases, coordinating and making referrals to different agencies, participating in meetings like child protection seminars or mental health, maintaining records needed in preparation of legal action, guiding evidence to be used in court, helping clients through individual or group conferences, developing and implementing written materials for educational purposes, conducting workshops and providing psychiatric social work.

Summarizes challenges to unified data collection, sharing, and analysis among judges who hear child protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performance.

Strengthening Texas Courts for the Safety, Permanency, and Well Being of Children in Foster Care (PDF - 472 KB) Task Force on Child Protection Case Management and Reporting, Supreme Court of Texas (2006) Summarizes challenges to unified data collection, sharing, and analysis among judges who hear child protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performChild Protection Case Management and Reporting, Supreme Court of Texas (2006) Summarizes challenges to unified data collection, sharing, and analysis among judges who hear child protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court peProtection Case Management and Reporting, Supreme Court of Texas (2006) Summarizes challenges to unified data collection, sharing, and analysis among judges who hear child protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performCourt of Texas (2006) Summarizes challenges to unified data collection, sharing, and analysis among judges who hear child protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performchild protection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court peprotection cases in Texas, discusses progress toward a uniform statewide system for managing and tracking data on child abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performchild abuse and neglect cases, and suggests best practices for measuring and improving court performcourt performance.

Family Group Conferencing and Child Protection Mediation: Essential Tools for Prioritizing Family Engagement in Child Welfare Cases Olson (2009) Family Court Review, 47 (1) Describes how family group conferencing and child protection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes for chilChild Protection Mediation: Essential Tools for Prioritizing Family Engagement in Child Welfare Cases Olson (2009) Family Court Review, 47 (1) Describes how family group conferencing and child protection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes forProtection Mediation: Essential Tools for Prioritizing Family Engagement in Child Welfare Cases Olson (2009) Family Court Review, 47 (1) Describes how family group conferencing and child protection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes for chilChild Welfare Cases Olson (2009) Family Court Review, 47 (1) Describes how family group conferencing and child protection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes for chilchild protection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes forprotection mediation actively encourage family engagement and positively impact outcomes for children.

The annual Summit is the largest child welfare event in Florida, and the department anticipates the convening of more than 3,000 child welfare professionals and related partners, including attorneys, case managers, child advocates, child protective investigators and supervisors, Child Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and ychild welfare event in Florida, and the department anticipates the convening of more than 3,000 child welfare professionals and related partners, including attorneys, case managers, child advocates, child protective investigators and supervisors, Child Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and ychild welfare professionals and related partners, including attorneys, case managers, child advocates, child protective investigators and supervisors, Child Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and ychild advocates, child protective investigators and supervisors, Child Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and ychild protective investigators and supervisors, Child Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and yChild Protection Team staff, child welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and ychild welfare trainers, court staff, DCF staff, relative caregivers, foster and adoptive parents, guardians ad litem, judges, law enforcement, juvenile justice professionals, service providers, and youth.

The court's role is to think carefully, guided primarily by the protection of the child's, not the parents» interests or ill - conceived notions of social engineering about the implications of decisions as to where, with whom, and under whose tutorship children in each case before the court will spend their lives.

All of the above - noted helpful information should aid attorneys representing abused parents or the children in custody cases involving DV and SA in selecting custody evaluators, obtaining useful orders from judges, crafting cross examination of evaluators once they have written their reports to the court, and seeking the protection their clients need.