Not exact matches
Local businessman Peter Landau will be subjected to more
court action after China - controlled Nkwe Platinum filed a $ 2.5 million law suit in the Supreme Court of Western Austr
court action after China - controlled Nkwe Platinum filed a $ 2.5 million
law suit in the Supreme
Court of Western Austr
Court of Western Australia.
The
suit alleges that the
law gives the Ugandans standing to sue Lively for his activities, which had a crucial nexus
in the U.S. and therefore come under federal
courts» jurisdiction; it also charges that Lively not only advocated bad ideas
in an abstract context but helped various Ugandans conceive and manage a campaign of persecution, thus involving himself
in a joint criminal enterprise.
The
suit was filed Wednesday
in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia for the college by the Becket Fund, the same
law firm that is representing multiple lawsuits against the HHS policy.
Under previous
law, as interpreted by the Supreme
Court in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the statute of limitations on such
suits ran out 180 days after the alleged discrimination occurred, even if the victims never knew about it.
If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it
in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a
Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the
Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.
He then brought a
suit demanding his freedom
in St. Louis County
Court under Missouri
law, claiming that he was legally entitled to be free by virtue of having resided
in a free state or territory.
In June»98 a U.S. District Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claim
In June»98 a U.S. District
Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's cl
Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claim
in Maryland threw out the
suit in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claim
in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's
court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's cl
court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's
law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claims.
Last month, a State Appellate
Court ruled
in favor of two home healthcare workers who filed
suit claiming the 13 - hour rule violated New York State's minimum wage
laws, since they were made available to work 24 - hours a day by being live -
in home health workers.
U.S. District
Court Judge Jed Rakoff denied the board's motion to dismiss the
suit, clearing the way for the parties — represented by the Brennan Center for Justice and the
law firm of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady — to move forward
in advance of the 2012 election cycle.
Lawyers from the Central American Refugee Center, a Long Island immigrant legal services organization commonly known as Carecen, and the Hofstra
Law Clinic filed suit against Nassau County in state Supreme Court, saying that the county police department was cooperating with ICE in ways that break state l
Law Clinic filed
suit against Nassau County
in state Supreme
Court, saying that the county police department was cooperating with ICE
in ways that break state
lawlaw.
The
Court of Appeal sitting
in Ado Ekiti has nullified the election of Mr. Oyetunde Ojo, the ACN candidate and an
in -
law to the former governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu on the strength of the
suit instituted by the National Reformation Party, NTP, alleging that INEC omitted both the name and logo of the party from the electoral papers
No fewer than five police vans, scores of armed policemen and operatives of the Department of State Services were deplored
in the Kwara State High
Court in Ilorin on Thursday to forestall the breakdown of
law and order as the libel
suit filed by the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, against an online medium, SaharaReporters, and its publisher, Omoyele Sowore, came up for hearing.
The aforementioned
suit over a candidate's use of LLC money was settled out of
court, so there hasn't yet been a clear test of what might be called the Sugarman Doctrine, which assumes underutilized power
in the sections of election
law prohibiting attempts to circumvent contribution limits and obfuscate the true source of campaign money.
In another suit, Nana Konadu and her NDP are praying the court to declare as illegal the deadline the EC set for receiving nominations and «a further declaration that the EC erred in law when it decided not to accept the applicants nomination thereby wrongfully and illegal disqualifying the applicants from contesting in the 2016 presidential elections.&raqu
In another
suit, Nana Konadu and her NDP are praying the
court to declare as illegal the deadline the EC set for receiving nominations and «a further declaration that the EC erred
in law when it decided not to accept the applicants nomination thereby wrongfully and illegal disqualifying the applicants from contesting in the 2016 presidential elections.&raqu
in law when it decided not to accept the applicants nomination thereby wrongfully and illegal disqualifying the applicants from contesting
in the 2016 presidential elections.&raqu
in the 2016 presidential elections.»
Abimbola further explained that Kayode Oloyede
in his
suit urged the
court to set aside the environmental sanitation days in the state on ground of not being constitutional and lawful as well as praying to the court to adopt the position taken against Lagos State by the Court of Appeal in a suit which struck down the Lagos State environmental day as being unconstitutional same not having been created by any existing
court to set aside the environmental sanitation days
in the state on ground of not being constitutional and lawful as well as praying to the
court to adopt the position taken against Lagos State by the Court of Appeal in a suit which struck down the Lagos State environmental day as being unconstitutional same not having been created by any existing
court to adopt the position taken against Lagos State by the
Court of Appeal in a suit which struck down the Lagos State environmental day as being unconstitutional same not having been created by any existing
Court of Appeal
in a
suit which struck down the Lagos State environmental day as being unconstitutional same not having been created by any existing
law.
The city's agreement with Pregnancy Care Center of New York ends a Manhattan federal -
court suit the clinic brought after then - Mayor Mike Bloomberg signed Local
Law 17
in 2011.
On November 26, 2008, independent U.S House candidate Faye Coffield filed
suit in U.S. District
Court in Georgia, asking that the Georgia ballot access
law for independent candidates for U.S. House of Representatives be declared unconstitutional
In a brief submitted to the Appellate Court, lawyers representing the city said the suit was «an opportunistic lawsuit without any basis in law.&raqu
In a brief submitted to the Appellate
Court, lawyers representing the city said the
suit was «an opportunistic lawsuit without any basis
in law.&raqu
in law.»
Sampson said, «It is evident that the Governor of Rivers State has no regard for
court processes; when in the face of the pending suits before the Federal High Court, he signed the Neigbourhood Safety Corps Bill into
court processes; when
in the face of the pending
suits before the Federal High
Court, he signed the Neigbourhood Safety Corps Bill into
Court, he signed the Neigbourhood Safety Corps Bill into
law.
In other pollution cases, the Supreme
Court has supported
suits claiming that pollution caused harm as a «nuisance» under common
law, most often interpreted to prohibit noise and light pollution.
The 80 minutes of occasionally spirited argument at the high
court this morning focused on the two main issues
in the greenhouse gas litigation: For the case to go forward, the plaintiffs must prove that the case has legal standing (they must show that the
court is the right venue for resolving this dispute), and that the common
law definition of nuisance can support
suits over greenhouse gases.
It looked a bit as if a fungus had suddenly grown from the Martian soil and prompted a
law suit in a California
court by science writer Rhawn Joseph, who claimed that the rock was a living organism that NASA refused to investigate properly.
The
suit, filed
in U.S. District
Court in Hartford on Aug. 22, argues that federal funding to Connecticut falls far short of what is needed to meet the
law's testing and accountability requirements, a violation of the U.S. Constitution and provisions
in the nearly 4 - year - old statute itself.
A group representing Hispanic parents filed
suit in federal district
court in Boston last week, charging Massachusetts officials with failure to comply with federal
laws protecting the rights of the state's 14,000 Hispanic students of limited English proficiency.
Copyright 1988 Washington — The U.S. Supreme
Court has agreed to decide whether an appellate court misinterpreted key civil - rights laws in a suit involving the racially motivated dismissal of a Dallas high - school football c
Court has agreed to decide whether an appellate
court misinterpreted key civil - rights laws in a suit involving the racially motivated dismissal of a Dallas high - school football c
court misinterpreted key civil - rights
laws in a
suit involving the racially motivated dismissal of a Dallas high - school football coach.
This past July, the D.C. Association of Chartered Public Schools filed
suit in federal district
court claiming that the District of Columbia has been underfunding charter schools
in violation of the U.S. Constitution and federal
law.
The
suit, filed
in Albany
in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of New York, cites a ruling
in that jurisdiction earlier this year that the disclosure provisions of the state's pioneering «truth -
in - testing»
law are
in direct conflict with federal copyright
law.
The Arizona Supreme
Court ruled that vouchers violated the state constitution
in 2009, and the union and state school boards» association filed
suit against education savings accounts shortly after Gov. Jan Brewer signed them into
law.
The College Board, the Educational Testing Service, and other testing agencies last week filed a
suit asking a federal
court to allow them to offer some of their examinations
in New York State without disclosing the questions and answers, as state
law currently requires.
The
court will seek to settle a long - standing split
in the federal appeals
courts over whether a broader federal civil rights
law, known as Section 1983, also provides the basis for
suits alleging sex discrimination
in education.
The Minnesota Federation of Teachers is expected to file
suit this month
in federal
court challenging the constitutionality of the
law — called the «Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act» — because it permits state payments to church - related colleges.
The alliance and several families also filed as an intervenor
in the state
court suit challenging the constitutionality of the voucher
law.
The Minnesota Federation of Teachers has filed
suit in federal district
court in St. Paul to block the state's 1985 Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act on the grounds that the
law violates both the state and federal constitutions by permitting the «direct diversion» of public funds from public schools to church - related colleges and universities.
The ED could order a state to respond, but if the department elected not to hear an appeal, the complainant could file
suit in state
court, an odd approach for a federal
law to take, given that
in our federal system the United States does not define the jurisdiction of state
courts.
The establishment forces aligned against reform filed
suit in King County Superior
Court July 3 to block the charter school
law approved by the voters last November.
In May 2014, after exhausting the procedures of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) Commission, Ms. I filed suit in federal court, alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the EEO Act and various claims under the Constitution and state la
In May 2014, after exhausting the procedures of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) Commission, Ms. I filed
suit in federal court, alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the EEO Act and various claims under the Constitution and state la
in federal
court, alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the EEO Act and various claims under the Constitution and state
law.
Sacramento, CA - March 8, 2016 - The California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) filed
suit today against the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) to obtain a
court order requiring OUSD to comply with Proposition 39, a California
law passed
in 2000 that requires school districts to share facilities equitably with all public school students, including charter public school students.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has filed
suit in court against the US Department of Education, on the grounds that the federal government has rewritten and weakened FERPA's regulations
in a way that violates the language and original intent of the
law.
Mr. Cunningham is also referencing a
suit in Washington state against the charter school sector that was working its way through the
courts at the time — charters
in Washington lost, with the state Supreme
Court ruling that the state's charter school
law violated the state Constitution.
And on Thursday, backed by a Chicago - based
law firm, Gawronski filed
suit (PDF) against Amazon
in federal
court, seeking class - action status.
You agree that any action at
law or
in equity arising out of or relating to these terms and conditions shall be filed only
in, and resolved
in, the federal or state
courts in the State of Illinois, and you hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such
courts over any
suit, action or proceeding arising out of this Notice.
The Canadian
suit has been handled by a consortium of
law firms before a Ontario Superior
Court judge
in Toronto.
The
suit, filed last week
in Crittenden County Circuit
Court, brings together 215 Arkansas cities and all 75 counties
in the state and accuses opioid manufacturers of wreaking havoc by aggressively pushing the drugs from the early 2000s to the present, leading to hundreds of overdose deaths while straining
law enforcement and public health resources.
The inventor usually knows this and will take a moment before bringing a costly
suit against a worthy competitor who would be able to show the invalidity of the claim
in the
court of
law.
In that case, the Supreme Court will be considering the controversial decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the Alien Tort Statute (which allows lawsuits in U.S. courts for violations of international law) does not create a legal basis for such suits against corporation
In that case, the Supreme
Court will be considering the controversial decision of the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals, which ruled that the Alien Tort Statute (which allows lawsuits
in U.S. courts for violations of international law) does not create a legal basis for such suits against corporation
in U.S.
courts for violations of international
law) does not create a legal basis for such
suits against corporations.
Boulder County and San Miguel County, along with the city of Boulder, have filed a common
law suit in Colorado state
court today against ExxonMobil and Suncor.
There followed a
law suit by Singer, where the
court found
in Singer's favor.
In the
courts, the Heartland Institute highlighted the fossil fuel - funded Energy & Environment Legal Institute (EELI)'s
law suit claiming that the state's renewable energy standard (RES) was unconstitutional...
It may be that Brite can start again, taking advantage of a Texas
law that allows you to bring a
suit even after limitations has expired if the original
suit was filed
in the wrong
court.
A federal appeals
court has tossed a
suit filed by professional minor league baseball players who claimed the league illegally depressed wages
in violation of antitrust
law.