Sentences with phrase «court in the case agreed»

Not exact matches

That's what's at stake for businesses in a case called Spokeo, Inc. vs. Robins, which the high court agreed to hear on Monday.

While the Supreme Court in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruCourt in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting rucourt in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruling.

Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner withdrew their divorce case from court on Wednesday, agreeing to private negotiations in order to spare their 6 - year - old son further public embarrassment, the New York Daily News reported Wednesday.

If you ship products out of state, this provision requires purchasers to agree to allow any court case concerning your goods to be heard at a court in your own, presumably friendlier, locale.

DOL filed a motion Friday requesting that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas be consolidated; the plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»

DOL filed a request on June 20 that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas be consolidated; the plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»

A court in Hamm, Germany, has agreed to hear the case.

The last - minute rewrite prompted a federal judge in September to dismiss challenges by Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey, but the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to consider the cases.

I can agree with Kelley that the government is often wrong in these church - state cases, more often wrong than the Supreme Court is willing to admit.

In no way does this article indicate any Supreme Court has agreed to hear this case.

A new court ruling out of White County has approved a state - run program that offers a 30 - day reduced sentence to prison inmates if they agree to undergo a long - term (in some cases, permanent) form of contraception.

While the case was decided 5 — 4, the opinions that accompanied the court's decision also signal that seven of the nine justices agree that businesses can make religious liberty claims in court — an important ruling, said Joshua Hawley, senior counsel for The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.

In a December 3, 2017 order dismissing the case that is likely to be viewed with some relief by many dairy companies, US district judge Katherine B Forrest agreed with Dannon, noting that a court handling a similar false advertising lawsuit about «non-GMO» claims on dairy products fed GM feed (Gallagher v. Chipotle Mexican Grill) rejected a similar claim at the pleading stage.

If the child's other parent agrees to the relocation (in cases where the court has given the other parent visitation rights)

The district settled the case a year later, agreeing to a court order to spend more money in minority neighborhoods, though it never admtted to engaging in discrimination.

The Department of Law, along with the plaintiffs in the case, have also agreed to recommend the court's monitor have the three - year oversight with the stipulation that the NYPD is in «substantial compliance» with the ruling.

The claimants have based their case on the assumption that it is irrevocable, and at least in the High Court, the government agreed.

A federal appeals court in Manhattan agreed Thursday to postpone any retrial of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on corruption charges until the Supreme Court acts on a planned petition to further review his court in Manhattan agreed Thursday to postpone any retrial of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on corruption charges until the Supreme Court acts on a planned petition to further review his Court acts on a planned petition to further review his case.

Two cases in January will be reheard, because four of the five judges on the court could not agree on a decision.

Eliot Spitzer and the state Legislature agreed that while the court case was brought by a group of New York City parents, the ruling should apply to all schools in the state.

STATEN ISLAND — The state's highest court agreed Monday to expedite the appeals process to release the grand jury testimony in the Eric Garner case.

The justices remanded the case to a federal appeals court and left open the possibility that McDonnell could be re-tried if prosecutors had evidence to show that the former governor agreed to pressure state researchers to study Anatabloc or force the supplement's inclusion in the state health plan.

This means that any extension would not only be: - subject to a specific case being made by the Director of Public Prosecutions; - subject every seven days up to the agreed limit to the approval of a High Court Judge; - subject to the regular report of the independent reviewer with an annual debate in parliament; - but also be subject in each and every instance to a specific parliamentary notification procedure, to a further statement to parliament on the individual case, a review on the specific case by the independent reviewer and with the provision for this House to scrutinise and debate the report and all the circumstances.

«All these cases went up to the Supreme Court until the fourth time in 2015, when God agreed that I will be President of Nigeria.»

The US Supreme Court agreed to take up the case of the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of Catholic nuns facing tens of millions of dollars in IRS fines because they can not, according to their faith, include contraceptives in their employee health plan.

You can't precisely accuse George W. Bush of rigging Florida in 2000 by winning a court case, although some do accuse him of «stealing» the election, since they don't agree with all the various courts» decisions in respect of the recount.

Smith, a Rensselaer County attorney appointed special prosecutor by a Supreme Court judge who reviewed evidence in the case last year, informed Herrick on Wednesday that seven others, including the several elected officials, have voluntarily submitted or agreed to give DNA samples to State Police investigators.

«The bottom line here is that while I agree with the premise that where there is smoke there is fire, in this case there clearly is smoke but I am not able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a court that there is fire at this time,» Flynn said.

«Both parties agreed that in order to pursue genuine reconciliation, nobody should pursue the case again at Supreme Court.

The Council is arguing against the case by saying that it has never thought the schools are needed, and in August, the High Court agreed to hear the case.

A majority of the seven - member Supreme Court must agree to take the case or it would remain in the appeals cCourt must agree to take the case or it would remain in the appeals courtcourt.

When the prosecution answered in the affirmative, the court then stood down the case for ten minutes and directed counsel to meet and agree on certain conditions for bail for the defendants which would be subjected to the approval of the court.

«All these cases went up to the Supreme Court until the fourth time in 2015, when God agreed that I would be President of Nigeria.»

Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case brought by some voters in Texas that could define the meaning of the principle of «one person, one vote.»

In January, a district court agreed to hear the case, a first in ChinIn January, a district court agreed to hear the case, a first in Chinin China.

The court agreed in at least two previous cases.

In extreme cases the court may appoint a guardian, usually a parent, who can agree to the involuntary hospitalization of the patient — a process that results in very few patients actually being forcibly hospitalized, and even then they can leave treatment after there has been certain improvement in their conditioIn extreme cases the court may appoint a guardian, usually a parent, who can agree to the involuntary hospitalization of the patient — a process that results in very few patients actually being forcibly hospitalized, and even then they can leave treatment after there has been certain improvement in their conditioin very few patients actually being forcibly hospitalized, and even then they can leave treatment after there has been certain improvement in their conditioin their condition.

He agrees to defend Russian spy Rudolf Abel (Mark Rylance) and persuades the court to spare Abel's life in case he'll...

The Court's decision to hear Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education (Case No. 84 - 1340) marked the first time in recent years that it has agreed to review the use of affirmative - action procedures by school officials.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed last week to review an important procedural case affecting the ability of government officials, including school administrators, to raise a defense of immunity in civil rights lawsuits.

In March of this year, shortly after the Peter Jennings Project conference, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that prosecution of the Tunkhannock teens was «in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it begaIn March of this year, shortly after the Peter Jennings Project conference, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that prosecution of the Tunkhannock teens was «in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it begain retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it began.

A county circuit court agreed in December to reopen the 1975 case that Judge Arthur Recht finally decided in 1982, ruling the state school system unconstitutional.

Unlike Scalia, however, Gorsuch can disagree with his colleagues without being disagreeable, making it easier to agree in future cases, a quality that could make Gorsuch particularly effective on the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review an appellate court ruling in a case (Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association) challenging the constitutionality of a California law that levies an agency fee on teachers who refuse to join a uCourt recently agreed to review an appellate court ruling in a case (Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association) challenging the constitutionality of a California law that levies an agency fee on teachers who refuse to join a ucourt ruling in a case (Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association) challenging the constitutionality of a California law that levies an agency fee on teachers who refuse to join a union.

And the leaders of K - 12 Inc. settled a high - profile court case with California Attorney General Kamala Harris this year, agreeing to dispense millions in payments and debt relief to their nonprofit school operators after state officials said the Virginia - based company misled the state in order to take in more public funding.

In December 2000, sensing where the Court might be heading, NEA lead counsel Robert Chanin stated at a Manhattan Institute conference on school choice, «If and when the Supreme Court agrees to hear one of these cases, it is my hope that the Court will reaffirm the position taken in 1973 in NyquisIn December 2000, sensing where the Court might be heading, NEA lead counsel Robert Chanin stated at a Manhattan Institute conference on school choice, «If and when the Supreme Court agrees to hear one of these cases, it is my hope that the Court will reaffirm the position taken in 1973 in Nyquisin 1973 in Nyquisin Nyquist.

After three and half years, much of it mired in controversy over technology missteps like the rollout of a $ 1.3 billion iPad program and a court case that struck down teacher tenure laws in California, the schools chief and the board have agreed to part ways.

Plaintiff districts in the state's school funding case known as Leandro succeeded in court this month when a three - judge panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals agreed that the state can not create barriers that would prevent eligible preschoolers from enrolling in a pre-kindergarten procourt this month when a three - judge panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals agreed that the state can not create barriers that would prevent eligible preschoolers from enrolling in a pre-kindergarten proCourt of Appeals agreed that the state can not create barriers that would prevent eligible preschoolers from enrolling in a pre-kindergarten program.

When one of the attorneys in the famous Sheff desegregation case said, «the state has an obligation to provide great, racially diverse schools,» Connecticut's Supreme Court agreed and ordered the legislature to take definitive action to reduce racial isolation in the state's urban public schools.

It shall be a routine use of records in this system to disclose them in proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her individual capacity where DOT has agreed to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely to affect the United States, is a party to the proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected.