Failing to adhere to these requirements, the S corporation may not prevail in
court in the case of a liability action, with the result that the stockholders are severally and individually held to be liable.
[15] In addition, the Supreme
Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart ruled that Congress may ban certain late - term abortion techniques, «both previability and postviability».
Many parents are also adding dispute resolution procedures to their plans, to avoid returning to
court in the case of a disagreement.
This decision was reaffirmed in 2008 by Suffolk County
Court in the case of Colaiacovo v. Dormer with Judge Gary J. Weber stating, «Simply put, the State of New York and its agencies are no longer in a position to require that a handgun be stored in an inoperable condition or otherwise locked up if it is otherwise legally present in the owner's dwelling.»
In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme
Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.
«Having regard to the settled position of the law as expoused by our courts in not less than five cases wherein the suspension of legislators by legislative houses was annulled and set aside, the Senate should withdraw the appeal filed against the judgment of the Federal High
Court in the case of Senator Omo - Agege.
«It is not Rockson Bukari who is relocating the assembly block, I do not have such powers, it is a ruling of
a court in the case of Philip Ayamba vrs the Attorney General in the citing of the assembly's office block.
The Commission has received a certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme
Court in the case of the Republic vrs.
Ed School Affiliates Argue for University of Texas Harvard Crimson, October 16, 2012» [Philip] Lee and fellow doctoral student Matthew P. Shaw put that belief into practice in August by filing an amicus brief with the United States Supreme
Court in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District AFC submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme
Court in the case of Endrew F., which presents the important question of what makes an education «appropriate» as guaranteed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
can grandparent send a letter or disposition to
court in cases of child custody dispute.
The Arizona Supreme
Court in the case of In Re Marriage of Gove addressed whether a parent can be required to sign a release of his or her medical and psychological records in a child custody case.
Second is today's oral argument before the U.S. Supreme
Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which «concerns the torture of Ogoni leaders in Nigeria, but at stake is the future of the law under which this case was brought, the Alien Tort Statute.»
The need to be able to explain the purpose of transfers into offshore holding structures was further emphasised by the English Supreme
Court in the case of Prest v Petrodel Resources (which will be influential in the many offshore jurisdictions whose legal systems are based on English common law).
The law creates an exception to foreign nations» immunity to lawsuits in U.S.
courts in cases of state - sponsored terrorism.
By Mclean Ayearst, legal research volunteer and former Legal Network intern January 13, 2016 The Canadian HIV / AIDS Legal Network is part of a coalition which is intervening at the Supreme
Court in the case of R. v. Lloyd, the latest challenge to Canada's harsh and damaging drug laws.
He recently authored an amicus curiae brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court in a case of great economic significance to condominiums, in which the right of associations to impose successive liens on owners who withhold condominium fee payments was upheld by the SJC.
This question, and the concept of discoverability, were recently discussed by
the court in the case of Huang v. Mai which can be read here.
However, if you don't create the prenuptial agreement correctly or you include invalid items, then the entire agreement could be thrown out in
court in the case of your divorce.
The court in the case of Wheeling Park Commission v. Dattoli determined that the injured man's case against the park was incomplete in that the man failed to submit any evidence regarding the duty the park had to maintain the handrail.
Notably, the U.S. Supreme
Court in the case of Castle Rock v. Gonzalez came to its conclusion that there was no civil liability of a police department or police officers for failure to enforce a restraining order in the face of language in a state statute whose plain language fairly clearly created a mandatory duty to that effect.
Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, writing for
the court in the case of South Carolina v. United States (Civil Action No. 12 - 203), expressed the opinion of the court that the law enacted by South Carolina «satisfies Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,» making it permissible, but that the short time left before the 2012 elections prohibited its implementation until elections taking place in 2013.
He has a particular interest in Taxi Licensing having successfully appeared in the High
Court in the case of Kaivanpor v Sussex Central Justices (Unreported, Div Ct).
Nationals of the former Yugoslavia as well as, at present, those of Bosnia - Herzegovina were therefore aware, or should have been aware, that they were amenable to the jurisdiction of their national criminal
courts in cases of violation of international humanitarian law.
Notable cases in which Pierre was involved included an appeal against deprivation of citizenship on national security grounds following remittal to SIAC by the Supreme
Court in the case of Pham («B2»); an appeal concerning registration under the statelessness provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 in the case of MK (India); three out of hours applications for injunctions successfully preventing same - day removal and numerous challenges to Home Office policy and the Immigration Rules.
In coming to the conclusion that «International Fashions, GDL and SOS were three components of the same corporate structure» and thus one «common employer» Justice Akhtar, in addition to looking at the facts of the case, relied on what was said by the British Columbia Supreme
Court in the case of Sinclair v. Dover Engineering Services Ltd. (1987), 1987 CanLII 2692 (BC SC), 11 B.C.L.R. (2d) 176 (BC SC), affd (1988), 1988 CanLII 3358 (BC CA), 49 D.L.R. (4th) 297 (BC CA), at paragraph 18 of its reasons for decision:
The difference of the jurisdiction in
this court in the cases of writs of error to State courts and to Circuit Courts of the United States pointed out, and the mistakes made as to the jurisdiction of this court in the latter case by confounding it with its limited jurisdiction in the former.
The judgment of the Supreme
Court in the case of HSE v Chevron North Sea Limited on 8th February 2018 had been eagerly awaited...
His government will have to decide whether to appeal to the Supreme
Court in the case of Al Rawi and others v The Security Service and others [2009] EWHC 2959 (QB).
That was the headline of an article posted earlier this week by the Financial Post (article here,) following the decision of the Ontario Superior
Court in the case of BlackBerry Limited v. Marineau - Mes, 2014 ONSC 1790 (CanLII).
In what should put chills in my fellow family law attorneys» spines, on July 2, 2014, a South Carolina family law attorney was publicly reprimanded by the South Carolina Supreme
Court in the case of In Re.
Not exact matches
The
case is
In re: Facebook Inc IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, U.S. District
Court, Southern District
of New York, No. 12 - md - 02389.
At the opening
of the trial
in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the
Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses
of public funds, to reject the
case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one
of the judges, said.
And the Viacom CEO is caught
in a Catch - 22
of his own making: Earlier this year, he maintained
in a
court case launched by the billionaire's former girlfriend that Redstone was fully capable
of making decisions.
Mumbai jewellers Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are prime suspects
in the
case and a special
court of India's Central...
The U.S. Supreme
Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
Court's decision at the beginning
of 2015 to accept the
case in which a
court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
court majority ruled
in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.
The Air Force
Court of Appeals
in May 2017 also reversed a conviction
in the sexual assault
case U.S. v. Boyce after finding that public statements by Sens. Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand regarding the «Marines United» scandal earlier this year created «the appearance
of unlawful command influence»
in the
case, as retired Col. Don Christensen, a former Air Force chief prosecutor and current president
of the advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, told Task & Purpose at the time.
Gillibrand was endorsed Tuesday by End Citizens United, a political action committee established
in 2015 to push back against the results
of the 2010
court case.
There's the third, more realistic action, which is you have to get some sort
of production order
of the data at Uber as evidence
in a
court case.
In her announcement, Gillibrand criticized the 2010 Supreme
Court case, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, which ruled that the government should not regulate the amount
of money corporations and unions can spend on campaigns.
GENEVA — Russian billionaire and Chelsea soccer club owner Roman Abramovich has appeared
in a Swiss
court as part
of a 19 - year - old legal
case aimed to wrest 46 million Swiss francs
in debts allegedly owed by him and others to a European bank.
If people get their news from the president's Twitter (twtr) feed — or
in the
case of his Supreme
Court nominees — via Facebook (fb) Live, what does that mean for journalists and their audiences?
In 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty of being too liberal in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire cas
In 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty
of being too liberal
in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire cas
in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs
of nearly $ 500,000;
in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire cas
in fact, the recent
court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire
case.
In some
cases, these retailers were able to come to an agreement with their creditors and restructure their debts without going through bankruptcy
court, as the threat
of bankruptcy motivates the creditors to negotiate.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme
Court heard oral arguments
in an important pair
of cases, namely Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius.
Gawker Media founder and CEO Nick Denton will file for personal bankruptcy protection as early as Monday after losing a fight
in a Florida
court for a shield against a judgment
in a breach
of privacy
case involving professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, according to a person familiar with the matter.
In 2015, 54 such cases were filed in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell case
In 2015, 54 such
cases were filed
in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end of May alone, according to the Delaware Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals in that state (including the Dell case
in Delaware, and so far this year, 29 have been filed through the end
of May alone, according to the Delaware
Court of Chancery, which handles appraisals
in that state (including the Dell case
in that state (including the Dell
case).
A judge ruled
in favor
of the House
in 2016, but an appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the
case moved its way through the
courts.
The
court case revealed a series
of convoluted legal infractions performed by Amanat and Tuzman
in their work with the presently insolvent video - technology company, KIT Digital, a former multi-million dollar leader
in the cloud - based video management industry.
The decision by NB Liquor comes just days after the Supreme
Court of Canada ruled
in the
case of Gerard Comeau who was fined
in 2012 for bringing home cheaper beer and liquor he bought
in neighbouring Quebec.