Sentences with phrase «court in the child protection»

Large increases to application fees could discourage some local authorities making applications to court in child protection cases, hindering attempts to protect vulnerable children like Baby P, lawyers claim.

I have primarily worked in juvenile court in the child protection division.

Has been found by a court in a child protection hearing to have abused, neglected, or abandoned a child;

Working with the courts in child protection.

Not exact matches

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

Senators Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jessie Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law, enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid, a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers, and putting limits on the amount of money donors can give to campaigns, among other items.

After devastating New York State Court of Appeals ruling in Nassau, State Senate Coalition will act on a series of bills to strengthen protections for children against sex offenders

«With the inauguration of this court, there shall now be speedy trials in matters relating to children's welfare and protection, specifically from undue exposure and exploitation.

Senators Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jessie Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law, enacting the Dream Act - which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid, a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers, and putting limits on the amount of money donors can give to campaigns, among other items.

In a video, Sens. Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jesse Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law; enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid; a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers; and putting limits on the amount of money that donors can give to campaigns, among other itemIn a video, Sens. Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jesse Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law; enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid; a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers; and putting limits on the amount of money that donors can give to campaigns, among other itemin the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law; enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid; a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers; and putting limits on the amount of money that donors can give to campaigns, among other items.

After devastating New York State Court of Appeals ruling in Nassau, State Senate Coalition will act on a series of bills to strengthen protections for children against sex offenders New York, NY — The New York State Senate Coalition -LSB-...]

The Washington Post reported that the court decided «tenure, seniority and other job protections for teachers have created unequal conditions in public schools and deprive poor children of the best teachers.»

«It's surprising that the court, which used its bully pulpit when it came to criticizing teacher protections, did not spend one second discussing funding inequities, school segregation, high poverty or any other out - of - school or in - school factors that are proven to affect student achievement and our children.

When their children were not promoted to grade 4, the parents filed a class action suit in state court, alleging violations of the children's due process and equal protection rights under the state and federal constitutions.

In oral arguments presented in the Appellate Division, 2nd Department of the New York State Supreme Court, the plaintiffs argued that the existing school system is failing their children, and that the outsized job protections for chronically ineffective teachers across New York must be struck dowIn oral arguments presented in the Appellate Division, 2nd Department of the New York State Supreme Court, the plaintiffs argued that the existing school system is failing their children, and that the outsized job protections for chronically ineffective teachers across New York must be struck dowin the Appellate Division, 2nd Department of the New York State Supreme Court, the plaintiffs argued that the existing school system is failing their children, and that the outsized job protections for chronically ineffective teachers across New York must be struck down.

It's been ten years since the Children's Internet Protection Act — the law that requires public libraries and K - 12 schools to employ internet filtering software in exchange for certain federal funding — was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court as constitutional.

This Puerto Rico law provides that, in all cases in which a person is accused of domestic violence or child abuse, the court shall, by petition of party, issue a protection order for the petitioner so that he / she be the sole custodian of the animal.

The lawsuit, which is brought by a collective called Our Children's Trust and is often described as «kids versus climate change,» is built on an appeal to the equal - protection clause, namely, that in failing to take action on warming, the government is violating it by imposing massive costs on future generations; it is scheduled to be heard this winter in Oregon district court.

Our goal is to expand the jurisdiction of this innovative court in 2013 to include some child protection matters.

Hopefully, this child's rights centred ruling translates into a conscious effort from the Court to step up and set out an effective system of protection of children in migration irrespective of the ongoing political controversy and the sometimes too cautious approach of the Commission.

In 2014 he travelled to Uganda to meet with Supreme Court Judges and officials in national government on behalf of ROLE UK to develop training on child protection and international adoptioIn 2014 he travelled to Uganda to meet with Supreme Court Judges and officials in national government on behalf of ROLE UK to develop training on child protection and international adoptioin national government on behalf of ROLE UK to develop training on child protection and international adoption.

In its judgment the court said the existence of the right of appeal given by the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 20 and the right to receive interest on arrears in prescribed circumstances given by s 41, when taken in conjunction with the right to seek judicial review of failures to collect or enforce arrears of maintenance, means CSA 1991 provides the parent with care with substantial protection against incompetence on the part of the CSIn its judgment the court said the existence of the right of appeal given by the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 20 and the right to receive interest on arrears in prescribed circumstances given by s 41, when taken in conjunction with the right to seek judicial review of failures to collect or enforce arrears of maintenance, means CSA 1991 provides the parent with care with substantial protection against incompetence on the part of the CSin prescribed circumstances given by s 41, when taken in conjunction with the right to seek judicial review of failures to collect or enforce arrears of maintenance, means CSA 1991 provides the parent with care with substantial protection against incompetence on the part of the CSin conjunction with the right to seek judicial review of failures to collect or enforce arrears of maintenance, means CSA 1991 provides the parent with care with substantial protection against incompetence on the part of the CSA.

As the Supreme Court stated in Baker at para. 71, numerous international instruments have «placed special importance on protections for children and childhood».

Although the older child was not subject to any child protection proceedings, the grandparents wanted to change an existing court order to reflect the reality that they had been that child's only caregivers and that the mother had virtually no involvement in her life.

[14] «Both judges of the Provincial Court (Family Division) and Children's Aid Societies pressed strongly to have the change in appeal procedures applied to child protection cases,» said Thomson.

Some family judges, including many who were now part of the expanded UFC, thought they were better suited than their criminal law counterparts to deal with these young persons and argued that these cases and child protection cases should be in the same court.

In 2007, Ontario Court Justice Marvin Zuker was officially warned after he admitted altering court transcripts to remove comments he made about Harry Kopyto, a disbarred lawyer whom he refused permission to represent a party in a child protection applicatioIn 2007, Ontario Court Justice Marvin Zuker was officially warned after he admitted altering court transcripts to remove comments he made about Harry Kopyto, a disbarred lawyer whom he refused permission to represent a party in a child protection applicaCourt Justice Marvin Zuker was officially warned after he admitted altering court transcripts to remove comments he made about Harry Kopyto, a disbarred lawyer whom he refused permission to represent a party in a child protection applicacourt transcripts to remove comments he made about Harry Kopyto, a disbarred lawyer whom he refused permission to represent a party in a child protection applicatioin a child protection application.

He says for 20 years, he's provided information and support to families caught up in the system for free and has previously been granted approval by a court to represent a 16 - year - old pregnant girl in a child protection matter.

Since 2000, Heinrichs has worked in adoption, child protection, advocacy for special needs children and family, and separation and divorce in both provincial and supreme courts.

He also served in various capacities on the Drug Court Committee, the Child Life Protection Commission and the Coalition for the Prevention of Substance Abuse.

After evaluating this evidence, the judge determined that the children were not in need of protection or services from the court.

Likewise instructing a psychologist to assess neurodevelopment issues of parents in child protection cases, would require experience of working with adults in areas including ASD, ADHD and other specific learning difficulties and have an understanding of the child protection and family court processes.

the court's view of parenting and the rights of parents in relation to the protection of children («The Puritan tradition in New England laid the foundation of American parental authority and duty.

Plus, an American court in a Hague Convention case won't accept your defense that returning a child to the foreign country will put the child in grave risk of harm unless you can show that the foreign support services are unable to provide the needed protection.

There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.»

Ontario's Child, Youth and Family Services Act (CFSA) includes provisions that make it possible for the court to place a child in need of protection in the custody of a relative or community meChild, Youth and Family Services Act (CFSA) includes provisions that make it possible for the court to place a child in need of protection in the custody of a relative or community mechild in need of protection in the custody of a relative or community member.

«As needed» new courses, many developed with the NJI, included: the first course in Canada designed to teach judges communication skills; a judgment writing course; the first child protection program; courses on managing domestic violence cases; special programs to teach leadership and management skills to judges assuming the administrative roles within the Court; and a «family law primer» for Criminal Court judges who periodically sit in Family Court.

Cases in which courts are asked to enjoin or limit international visitation typically require a judge to consider the extent to which a foreign legal system is likely to provide an abducted child with the necessary protection and to effectively and promptly order the child's return to the child's habitual residence.

In the family law realm, topics have included interviewing children and assessing their credibility, cultural fluency in family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody caseIn the family law realm, topics have included interviewing children and assessing their credibility, cultural fluency in family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein family court, evidentiary issues in family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein family and child protection cases, adoption, and jurisdictional issues in custody casein custody cases.

In addition to her work with the Commission on Professionalism and the Cook County Bar Association, Gwen served as Staff Counsel to the Office of the Chief Judge for the Circuit Court of Cook County's Child Protection division.

It will be remembered from my earlier post that the President of the Family Division made various reporting restrictions in P (A Child), but as he did so declared considerable sympathy with all the inaccurate reporting in the media frenzy about the «forced C - section» because of lack of proper information from the Court of Protection.

The June 29, 2017 unanimous Supreme Court decision in Rodriquez v. Zavala unequivocally establishes that exposure to domestic violence harms children and that a parent's fear of harm for a child comes within the definition of «domestic violence» for purposes of a petition for a domestic violence protection order.

It means that, notwithstanding that a young person has capacity under the MCA 2005 or a child is Gilick competent, and is refusing the treatment / admission / deprivation of liberty; whilst the Court of Protection would have no jurisdiction, a Judge sitting in the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court, could overrule the young person's / child's refusal.

The Ontario hospital applied to the Court a few weeks later for an order stating that J.J. was «a child in need of protection,» and requiring her to be returned for treatment.

Paul's experience and expertise in this area is in the fields of children's services (support and accommodation under sections 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protectiochildren's services (support and accommodation under sections 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of ProtectioChildren Act 1989), former relevant children under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protectiochildren under the 1989 Act, age assessment disputes, mental capacity / Court of Protection cases.

In the event that the court or any other authority takes measures to ensure the protection of the child after its return to the State of habitual residence, the certificate shall contain details of such measures.

This was an appeal of a final order in a child protection case made by a judge of the SCJ in Ottawa (where there is a unified family court).

Martin represents parents and children including children in private law proceedings and vulnerable adults in the court of protection.

The Provincial Court is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cCourt is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic ccourt in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cases.

Access to court would be available through the family services agency to address urgent, interim matters relating to wellbeing of family members and threats to the family's economic stability, but access would be provided on the process used in child protection matters in which the court confirms steps taken by child protection authorities unless those steps are found to be unreasonable.