Sentences with phrase «court issued a number»

On June 28, 2007, Kentucky federal court issued a number of rulings in a class action lawsuit alleging that various real estate entities illegally conspired to fix commission rates.

Not exact matches

Tim Reid, the founder of Phoenix Real Estate Investing, which works with distressed homeowners, says the number of foreclosure notices issued by Alberta courts in Calgary and Edmonton jumped by about 15 per cent from November to December, and is up as much as 40 per cent on the year.

As The Nation pointed out after the election, «One out of every four Trump voters voted with the Supreme Court in mind, and it's a safe bet that a very substantial number of those see the Supreme Court through the lens of abortion politics... If you can rally voters around abortion, few other issues matter.»

An additional year should increase player maturity and also decrease the number of off court related issues.

As the number of family - related court filings has risen over the years, families have increasingly relied on the courts to resolve divorce issues and problems including child custody, visitation, child support, paternity, emergency protective orders, and restraining orders.

Although the UK ultimately paid up and issued an apology, it had to be brought kicking and screaming to court, and sought to stop the proceedings on a number of occasions.

Given the number of legal challenges to President Trump's actions, it's not unforeseeable that a Congressman will bring this issue to the federal courts.

They have raised a number of issues which include the lack of personal security for them, the poor state of their chambers and courtrooms, the lack of armed security in the courts and non-availability of risk allowances for them.

The issue eventually will be decided by the nine members of the U.S. Supreme Court, not the number of states involved in litigation.

Mayor Bloomberg put on a full - court press yesterday to close a deal raising the cap on the number of charter schools — dispatching two of his top deputies to Albany to help resolve the sticky issue of having charters share space with traditional public schools.

According to LIB, a restraining order with suit number: FC / AL / 25 / 2017, issued by an Ikeja Magistrates» court was obtained by the battered actress.

This office will touch on also immigration, family court and other issues, but I think the bulk of the focus is going to be on housing, just because that's where I think the biggest numbers are,» Mr. Levine said.

The new coalition points to a number of potential changes to the constitution that they would like to see, including the creation of a public financing system for campaigns, election reforms like same - day registration, court reforms to make it easier to navigate the judicial system and the ability for local municipalities to exercise greater control over issues they traditionally need state authority to manage.

«From the evidence before the court, the metre ticket and the waybill as well as invoice / PIN with N. 7576, purported to have been issued by Conoil Plc in respect of a tanker with Registration Number, Delta XD 459 WWR, conveying the AGO were forged.»

South Korean courts, for instance, have done so a number of times in dealing with virtual property; in contrast, U.S. courts have shied away from the issue.

Then, on 22 November, federal judge Amos L. Mazzant of the Eastern District of Texas issued an injunction that put implementation of the new rule on hold until the court could decide lawsuits brought against it by a number of states and employers.

We have an unusually large number of new commissions, bodies and court cases created to provide solutions to these fundamental education issues, and we ask that our education leaders tasked with steering the governance of our public schools to please do it well — and together.

Sixty - two years after the landmark Brown v. Board Supreme Court decision that desegregated America's public schools, the education system is still struggling with a number of issues in classrooms, including segregation, the opportunity and achievement gaps, school funding discrepancies, improving high school graduation rates, and college enrollment and persistence.

On June 27, the CA Superior Court issued a ruling finding that LAUSD has failed to comply with Proposition 39 and its implementing regulations in calculating school space, including the number of classrooms, offered to charter schools for the 2012 - 13 school year.

A commission chaired by the City of Chicago's Comptroller issued a report earlier this week which said that Chicago can no longer afford its subsidies for government worker retiree health care, which currently cost the city $ 109 million annually but would grow to nearly $ 500 million in a decade thanks to projected increases in the number of retirees and in health care costs.The commission offered Mayor Rahm Emanuel a series of suggestions on how to change the program to save money, including having workers pay a greater percentage of their own health care premiums in retirement, but it also concluded that the city might want to simply end the subsidy program, a move which almost certainly would be challenged in court.

To date, Kobo has never instigated a lawsuit, but has been in court over a number of issues, including the exclusivity clause in the contract with Borders when it filed for bankruptcy.

A number of recent court cases have debated the issue of financial compensation for emotional damages stemming from the negligent loss of a pet.

This issue of LawNow also has a number of featured articles about the Supreme Court of Canada as well as its regular columns on different areas of law.

The blawg features issues relating to the numbers of women who opt out of the legal profession and the poor representation of women in the courts and legal community.

The most obvious A2J issue is a court system that is bogged down with large numbers of self - represented human beings, in particular in the family law area.

But creating such divisions will raise, among other issues, difficult constitutional issues as to mandatory provincial representation by designated numbers of justices on the Supreme Court of Canada.

«The federal Pacer system shows that Mr. Trenkler has been represented in a number of proceedings in federal court over the last seventeen years by very competent counsel who (I am assuming from your correspondence) have not chosen to pursue further the issue you raise of inducements supposedly offered by prosecutors to the witness,» Vecchione wrote.

The large, and reportedly increasing, number of self representing litigants crowding the courts is the issue that currently dominates both public and professional discourse.

The legislation brought Wisconsin back into the mainstream and overturned a number of negative decisions issued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 2005 - 06 term.

With respect to issue number two, that the application judge erred in finding that an insurer was obligated to pay all expenses outlined in the Form 1, the Court agreed that with previous FSCO decisions that held that an insurer is permitted to request information to verify that an economic loss had been sustained by a family member providing care or other information or that the services provided were reasonable and necessary and found that the application judge did not rule in the contrary.

When they do, what court should take charge and if it does take charge what should it deal with - all assets and issues or only a limited number?

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Georgia issued a written opinion in a premises liability lawsuit brought by a number of people who were injured when the rear deck of a home owned by the defendant and rented to several of the plaintiffs disconnected from the home and fell to the ground.

Courts, including a number of appellate courts, have reviewed human rights tribunal decisions, and spoken to the obligation of professional regulatory hearing panels to address alleged discrimination, unless such issues are expressly excluded from their scope by enabling legislCourts, including a number of appellate courts, have reviewed human rights tribunal decisions, and spoken to the obligation of professional regulatory hearing panels to address alleged discrimination, unless such issues are expressly excluded from their scope by enabling legislcourts, have reviewed human rights tribunal decisions, and spoken to the obligation of professional regulatory hearing panels to address alleged discrimination, unless such issues are expressly excluded from their scope by enabling legislation.

While the client may be able to spend more time on their case, an attorney brings a comfort level to any number of issues that will arise out of a court case, such as making certain pleadings are correct and appearing in court.

It seems to me that the issue is one of scarcity — that Ontario is under - resourced in terms of managing the existing number of matters in terms of judges, court resources, support staff, et cetera.

As products have generally become more complex and sophisticated, and the number of large damage amounts being awarded by juries have grown, the courts have brought a heightened focus to light on these issues.

On May 31st the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal issued a judgement with a number of broad statements about the proportionality principle and how it ought to be applied by courts in crafting discretionary orders under civil rules.

At a recent CBA / SCC Liaison Committee meeting on Posting of Factums on the Web, the Supreme Court Justices raised questions concerning a number of legal and practical issues: * Who holds copyright in factums?

The law librarians of Ontario would be ecstatic if the Superior Court would issue a practice direction welcoming (or merely allowing) the use of online forms of judgments for books of authorities where the online version is reliable, has paragraph numbering, etc. (see my earlier SLAW blog post here from January 2008 on this topic).

A year after the decision in Richard, an Ontario Superior Court judge was asked to determine this issue in the context of an action brought by the federal commissioner of competition over claims made by wireless providers about the number of dropped calls.

Compounding the issue was the federal government's reluctance to appoint the number of judges to the UFC that would enable that Court to manage the caseload.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 2009 - 10 term issued a number of controversial decisions, two of which had to do with how the Court itself operates and how justices are disciplined.

The Roberts Court will confront pleas to reconsider or overrule a number of key decisions undergirding hot - button issues on the new term's docket.

Where your flat fee falls in this range will depend on the number of issues and court forms involved in your particular matter.

A large number of federal appellate courts state on the face of their precedential opinions that the date on which the opinion issued is the date on which the case was decided.

Recently, I wrote about an Ontario Court of Appeal called Stevens v. Stevens that dealt with a number of issues, among them the question of whether the trial judge's opinion of the husband had been tainted by the fact that the husband had had an extra-marital affair.

A large number of pleadings were exchanged before, the second defendant issued an application in the TCC to transfer the case from the county court to the TCC under CPR 30.3 (2) and para 2.1 of CPR Pt 60 PD.

As at July 2008 the courts have seen a significant drop in the number of cases being issued since the PLO was introduced.

This has resulted in an all time record number of people being subject to deputyship orders — orders issued by the Court of Protection appointing a Deputy Decision Maker to manage the property and financial affairs of a person deemed not to have the capacity to do it themselves.

While there are a number of other issues involved in this complex case, including claims that the judgment was obtained by fraud, the facts before the Court were simple: there was a final judgment in Ecuador against Chevron for US$ 9.51 billion.