Sentences with phrase «court judge ruled»

So much so that, in 2010, a High Court judge ruled that «the concept of alienation as a feature of some high conflict parental disputes may today be regarded as mainstream.»

The theory sounds plausible, and is backed up by a 2008 case when an Ontario Superior Court judge ruled that a 13 - year - old boy whose father had poisoned his relationship with his mother could be placed in a facility that deprograms children who suffer from parental alienation.

In what could become the largest - ever employer - related settlement claim, a Federal Court judge ruled that school bus contractor, First Student, is part of a proposed $ 5.9 million settlement fixed to criminal background checks that were conducted without written permission.

A Leon County Circuit Court judge ruled Gov. Rick Scott did not have the authority to remove county commissioners from office for defying that law.

However, the Beijing Haidian District Court judge ruled that the plaintiff provided no evidence that Huobi and the other exchanges were operating illegally, making him responsible for the risks associated with trading bitcoin.

Quebec thought it would get its hands on the data last September after a Quebec Superior Court judge ruled that since the registry was developed through partnerships between the federal government and its provincial counterparts, each should have a say in what happens to it.

A Superior Court Judge ruled however, that the Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in those emails.

For example, in the case of Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. v. Interstate Chemical, Inc., a Florida trial court judge ruled in favor of the new employer and dismissed the tortious interference claim brought by the former employer based on hiring the employee who had a non-compete contract.

In another summary judgment decision, a Superior Court judge ruled in favour of a plaintiff injured on college property on the first day of classes.

Almost a year after the Federal Court struck down the health care restrictions to refugees, a second Federal Court judge ruled in Y.Z. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) that restrictions imposed on some refugee claimants to an appeal body called the Refugee Appeal Division violated s. 15 of the Charter.

A Virginia Circuit Court judge ruled Tuesday that police officers can not force criminal suspects to divulge cellphone passwords, but they can force them to unlock the phone with a fingerprint scanner.

Find out here why a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled that the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton had overcharged its municipal client.

A family court judge ruled Wednesday that an obese man fighting for custody of his children, aged 5 and 6, will be put up for adoption.

Last year, a county court judge ruled that personal contracts could not be assigned under common law.

The circuit court judge ruled that the family expense and survival claims were subject to binding arbitration, but the motion to stay the wrongful death proceedings was denied.

The County Court judge ruled that Ms Curran is not entitled to share in either the home or the business.

The family court judge ruled that it was appropriate to reduce Pierce's annual alimony payment from $ 110,000 to $ 42,000, but not to end it entirely.

At a Feb. 21 hearing, a U.S. District Court judge ruled that the Trump administration must either fork over documents showing how the U.S. Department of State reversed an earlier decision and ultimately came to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, or else provide a substantial legal reason for continuing to withhold them.

The circuit court judge ruled that the attorney general had failed to provide any evidence of wrongdoing by Mann or any other climate scientist.

In January 2011, District Court Judge ruled that the groups» lawsuit challenging the Otter Creek Coal Mine was allowed to proceed.

Their lawsuits are not always successful, and in 2017 a U.S. District Court judge ruled that a moratorium on further wind development can be permissible in some situations.

In February of 2012 a district court judge ruled in favor of MEIC and other plaintiffs and determined that MDT failed to consider impacts of constructing new highway turnouts along the route.

In 2007, a British High Court judge ruled that Al Gore's global warming film contained nine significant errors and should no longer be screened in schools unless accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's «one - sided» views.

But in 2007, a British High Court judge ruled that Gore's film contained nine significant errors and should no longer be screened in schools unless accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's «one - sided» views.

The ruling came less than a month after another federal court judge ruled that a similar climate case, brought by the cities of San Francisco and Oakland, should be tried in federal court.

For example, in 2014, a Tax Court judge ruled that a couple who received airline miles for opening a new Citi bank account must count as income the value of the airline ticket they received for redeeming their rewards.

In October 2012 a Toronto bankruptcy court judge ruled (and I'm simplifying here) that since the Act refers to a bankruptcy, it does not apply to someone who files a consumer proposal.

In a pretty significant ruling last week, a UK high court judge ruled that the Galaxy Tab does not infringe the iPad design patent because «it -LSB-...]

This past April, the California Court of Appeals unanimously struck down the controversial Vergara v. California decision, in which a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled that five longstanding teacher protections — including a two - year probationary period for new teachers and a layoff system based on how many years one's been teaching — violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.

Last week a California superior court judge ruled that California's state's teacher tenure law was illegal.

A Wall - Street run virtual charter school had its plans to open in North Carolina derailed Friday afternoon after a Superior Court judge ruled in favor of state education officials.

An LA Superior Court judge ruled last year that the school district must begin including student performance data in teacher evaluations.

A superior court judge ruled last week that using taxpayer dollars to help send children to private schools is unconstitutional.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2014, finding that five long - standing teacher job protections, including a two - year probationary period for new teachers and a layoff system based on how many years one's been teaching, violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.

Last month, a Superior Court judge ruled L.A. Unified to be in violation of a 41 - year - old law requiring student progress to be part of teacher evaluations.

A Wake County superior court judge ruled Friday that a state law ending teacher tenure is unconstitutional, arguing the state can not take away the due process rights of teachers.

And the ongoing battle of the parents of Palm Lane students: the Superior Court judge ruled against the District and in favor of the parents.

-LSB-...] Lane students: the Superior Court judge ruled against the District and in favor of the parents.

In February, a High Court judge ruled that the the decision to axe projects in six local authority areas was «unlawful» because of a lack of consultation.

A state Superior Court judge ruled the laws violated students» constitutional rights.

Alexandria, VA — In a sweeping victory for education reformers in California, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled yesterday that state laws governing teacher tenure protections are unconstitutional.

The following April, a Richmond Circuit Court judge ruled that the Virginia Department of Education was to also release Loudoun County Public Schools» SGP scores by school and by teacher, including teachers» identifying information.

Essentially, the superior court judge ruled that increasing tenure from two to three years would be acceptable.

She also said union members should be more active in lobbying the state Legislature for such changes as keeping teacher performance ratings confidential — an L.A. Superior Court judge ruled last week that those ratings should be released to The Times.

In a landmark decision, a Superior Court judge ruled that Priority Schools qualified for protection, along with teachers in areas of shortage, under the teacher layoff statute because Priority Schools teachers received specialized training.

This summer, a Virginia circuit court judge ruled that statewide turnaround districts were unconstitutional in that state.

This year, a state court judge ruled in favor of a Long Island teacher, determining that the «ineffective» rating she had received on the growth - score portion of her evaluation (the part linked to student test results) was «arbitrary and capricious.»

Both parties appealed to the high court after a superior court judge ruled that the case could not be brought to trial on all grounds.

In September 2004, Texas lost a battle in the West Orange - Cove Consolidated ISD v. Nelson case: A district court judge ruled that the state's school finance system was unconstitutional.

A juvenile court judge ruled nonetheless that the Longs had a constitutional right to home school.