Sentences with phrase «court justices rule»

Supreme Court justices ruled, by a majority of eight to three, that Prime Minister Theresa May can not lawfully bypass MPs and peers by using the royal prerogative to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty and start the two - year process of negotiating the UK's divorce from its EU partners.

An Albany State Supreme Court justice ruled that there will be no Independence Party primary for Rensselaer County executive as the state party failed to follow state election law and its own rules.

In a decision later upheld in the first appeal, a state Supreme Court justice ruled that given the island's location, the judge's special status is reasonable.

Fisher, who got unanimous backing from her district's GOP convention, ran into a late season snafu in the past month when another State Supreme Court Justice ruled that votes taken in the Conservative Party's judicial nominating convention in September violated election law.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo can not penalize city schools by withholding $ 260 million in state aid over the DOE's failure to get to a teacher evaluation agreement with the union, a Manhattan Supreme Court justice ruled on Feb. 21.

But it lost this case, and several appeals, scoring only a minor victory last April when a New York supreme court justice ruled that SUNY Stony Brook had to appear in court to defend its possession of the animals.

In January 2001, a state supreme court justice ruled that the state's school funding system is inequitable, creating «an adverse impact on minority public school children.»

But this past week, a Quebec Superior Court justice ruled that key issues in the Dying with Dignity legislation contradict provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada.

The decision comes two years after Supreme Court justices ruled that the woman was an employee of the club, not an independent contractor, a determination that meant she was entitled to workers» compensation benefits.

The appellate court justices ruled there remained a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the owner of the property should have anticipated the plaintiff's harm, despite her knowledge of the danger.

Not exact matches

But company lawyer Jesse Binnall said the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the lower ruling, did so on procedural grounds, so that the Justice Department's win would not influence much elsewhere.

The record labels asked the Supreme Court to hear their appeal of the circuit court ruling, but the justices declCourt to hear their appeal of the circuit court ruling, but the justices declcourt ruling, but the justices declined.

Several courts have ruled against the merger, agreeing with the Department of Justice's (DOJ) argument that it would decrease competition and raise major antitrust concerns.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court that the Alabama Legislature and the federal court that ruled on the plan had taken a «mechanically numerical» view, instead of trying to figure out what percentage of black voters were needed to elect a candidate of their choice.

While the Supreme Court in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruCourt in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting rucourt in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruling.

The court ruled unanimously, and Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion.

In his dissent, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that the Constitution «had nothing to do with» that ruling by the court majority.

in December, when the Federal Court of Justice ruled the two Duffs could continue to coexist, neither having to change its name to Fudd.

US Supreme Court justices appeared unsure on Tuesday whether to rule against online TV startup Aereo in a major copyright case.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to issue the final rulings of its current term on Monday, amid talk that swing voter Justice Anthony Kennedy is considering retirement.

In a 50 - page ruling that read like a Supreme Court brief, he rejected in no uncertain terms the Department of Justice's aggressive use of the broad powers of the 1789 All Writs Act to force Apple to do its bidding in San Bernardino.

The European Court of Justice ruled the virtual currency can be treated in the same way as traditional money.

Last May, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that Google users had the «Right to be Forgotten,» meaning they can petition Google to remove search engine results about them.

In a recent court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijcourt case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijCourt of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.

May 30: Google launches tool that enables Europeans to request «right to be forgotten» in response to ruling by European Court of Justice.

The EU's Court of Justice announced a landmark ruling that nullifies that 15 - year - old Safe Harbour pact, which allows tech companies such as Facebook and Google to transfer European customer data to U.S. servers.

The European Court of Justice is expected to rule this year in a major case centered on whether Uber should be treated as a taxi service, which would mean it was subject to rigorous safety and employment rules, or merely as an online platform connecting independent drivers and waiting passengers.

The five lawsuits to block the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule continued to move forward in July in separate venues, but the Department of Justice strongly defended the rule in a Washington, D.C., federal district court challenging the suit filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities, or NAFA.

So here's a way for the Dreamers to be protected, President Trump to be responsive to public opinion and for the Department of Justice to devote its resources to better causes (like keeping AR - 15s out of the hands of crazy people)-- end the appeals and allow the court rulings to stand.

The French decision follows the May ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Mario Costeja González, a Spanish man who succeeded in ordering Google to remove links to an old article saying that his home was being repossessed to pay off debts.

An Ontario Court of Appeal justice has warned against «summary judgment at all costs» in her dissent of a ruling on the application of the doctrine of emergency in a personal injury case.

The justices on Tuesday agreed to review an appeals court ruling that said the...

The Department of Justice defended the rule when it filed papers in July in a Washington district court arguing against the case filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

But as with past Supreme Court ATS decisions, the justices once again failed to shut the door entirely on human rights activists: the ruling said nothing about the many ATS claims pending against American corporations.

Scalia, who previously served as DOL's chief legal officer and is the son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, agreed, stating that the DOL rule's impact «is nationwide, but it's very great in Texas.

Interestingly, the biggest move here wasn't from customers themselves but from the European Union Court of Justice, which upheld the Right to be Forgotten principle in a May ruling against Google.

The federal judge overseeing the case in Texas against the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule on Wednesday denied considering all but two of the eight amicus briefs filed in the court, allowing only the briefs filed by the Financial Planning Coalition and the American Association for Justice.

In 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that circumventing DRM on game devices may be legal under some circumstances, limiting the legal protection to only cover technological measures intended to prevent or eliminate unauthorised acts of reproduction, communication, public offer or distribution.

Germany: the German Ministry of Finance, in response to the questions of the deputy Frank Shaffler (no. 409, July 2013 and no. 226, September 2013), ruled that bitcoin is «private money» denying the exemption (also supported by the Court of Justice).

Estonia: the Estonian Tax Authority (Maksu - Tolliamet) published in March 2014 an interpretation of the taxation of bitcoin, ruling that bitcoin was subject to VAT (also supported by the Court of Justice).

Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the court's other liberals appeared likely to rule in Hawaii's favor.

Comparable treatment can be found in Europe, where EU member states exempt virtual currencies from taxation as a result of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling on October 22, 2015 stating that the exchange of traditional currency for Bitcoin virtual currency (and vice versa) is exempt from value added tax in the EU.

Let's hope that when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules against the rest of us.

Remember supreme court justice Sotomayor and her stating how great it was that she will bring a latinio female perspective to her rulings.

As Judge Learned Hand once observed, we have not anointed the Justices of the Supreme Court to rule us as a «bevy of Platonic Guardians.»

On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court's 1973 decision legalizing abortion, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced her misgivings about the ruling.

David, if someone robbed you and you went to court with the robber and found out that the Judge can only rule Not Guilty, then what is right and wrong, what is justice?

The Supreme Court is going to rule on this in the very short term... conservative handwringing about who Obama may put on the court aside, how else can we imagine the conservative justices ruling on Court is going to rule on this in the very short term... conservative handwringing about who Obama may put on the court aside, how else can we imagine the conservative justices ruling on court aside, how else can we imagine the conservative justices ruling on this?

David Robertson explains why he believes today's ruling by the European Court of Justice that employers can ban workers from wearing religious... More