Ahead of the sentencing, the government had asked for a «lengthy sentence» for Ulbricht, saying if
the court made an example of him, it could stop the proliferation of «dark markets» like Silk Road.
Not exact matches
You may have a life emergency, for
example, which demands the use
of your retirement monies; or, you may need the money to
make court - ordered payments.
The Law society, in other words, has given «guidance» to its members as to how to draft wills in a way which circumvents English legal principles as they have always been accepted: and it envisages that this might even mean taking on the English law in
court to see if their wily little legal tricks have been successful: a perfect
example of an attempt to
make the letter
of the law prevail over its spirit: Christians will remember that, according to St Paul (2 Corinthians 3:6), «the letter killeth but the spirit giveth life».
They repeatedly requested the Massachusetts General
Court, for
example, to establish a constitution so that the people
of the commonwealth would not be left «in a state
of nature,» by which they meant, with Jonathan Edwards, «Hobbs state
of war,» where men «would act as the wild beast
of the desert; prey upon and destroy one another, «35 We are not surprised to learn that Alexander Hamilton said, «We may preach till we are tired
of the theme the necessity
of disinterestedness in republics, without
making a single proselyte.»
For
example, in Lee v. Weisman the Supreme
Court protects a dissenting student from the burden of having to hear a prayer at graduation exercises, while in Lyng v. Northwest the same court approves the building of a logging road through sacred lands, making it impossible for a whole tribe of Indians to practice their reli
Court protects a dissenting student from the burden
of having to hear a prayer at graduation exercises, while in Lyng v. Northwest the same
court approves the building of a logging road through sacred lands, making it impossible for a whole tribe of Indians to practice their reli
court approves the building
of a logging road through sacred lands,
making it impossible for a whole tribe
of Indians to practice their religion.
His argument on the legislative history
of the Fourteenth Amendment, for
example, rests on a strained parsing
of the Reconstruction debates intended to show that the Privileges and Immunities Clause (which the Supreme
Court effectively eviscerated shortly after the Amendment's adoption) was intended to
make the Bill
of Rights operative against the states.
The child's preference, as stated in
court, if the child is
of a sufficient age and intelligence to
make such a decision (for
example, if the child is over age 12)
He has also
made multiple populist claims, that would be inconstitutional for any president to perform, for
example pledging that if any member
of congress was involved in corruption, he would personaly take them to jail, showing little for any due process, and ignoring the fact that members
of congress have political - immunity that can only be withdrawn by the Supreme
Court.
Starmer said that criminal charges were suitable where there were
examples of harassment; where
court orders were flouted; or where «grossly offensive» or «threatening» comments were
made - but that the free speech threshold must be set very high.
For
example, last month, a Supreme
Court justice in Brooklyn ruled in favor
of an Empire Center position that public pension information should be
made available for taxpayer inspection.
On the same day community watch volunteer George Zimmerman
made his first appearance in
court to face murder charges in the death
of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman tells WAMC that the case is a good
example of what can happen when the public takes an interest in pursuing justice.
DiFiore's address was delivered in the Bronx, but she used Brooklyn as an
example of gains
made in civil
courts.
He also wants the
court to «
make an
example of the anti-graft agency and slam the hammer» on it with a N520m damages.
The prime
example is the scene where Ms. Graham is leaving the Supreme
Court through a sea
of silently admiring women — an unbelievably disproportionate crowd
make - up.
«It is important for the U.S. Supreme
Court to take this case, as the Ninth Circuit opinion ignores 20 years
of precedents on special education law and represents yet another
example of a federal agency exceeding its authority over educational decision
making,» NSBA Executive Director Thomas J. Gentzel said.
For
example, it fails to consider Hunter v. Pittsburgh, the century - old U.S. Supreme
Court ruling that essentially renders districts (as well as other local governments) as subservient to state government, essentially
making the very concept
of local control a fiction.
You may have a life emergency, for
example, which demands the use
of your retirement monies; or, you may need the money to
make court - ordered payments.
In the case
of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, for
example, the Supreme
Court didn't
make a final ruling until 2008, 19 years after the spill.
If you are sued you must prove to the
court that two years have elapsed (since you last
made a payment, for
example), so the burden
of proof is on you.
They are akin to Public Events from the first game - with the likes
of the Arsenal Walker
making a comeback, for
example - but have a hint
of Court of Oryx about them, with disguised challenges to figure out and complete.
The pair were
made for the
court of the Qianlong Emperor and only four similar
examples have been sold at auction.
He also reacted away from European Modernist fashions, towards the kind
of narrative painting that had long existed in India, for
example in the miniature paintings
made for both Mughal and Hindu
courts.
One only has to look at the courageous
examples out there — the man who single - handedly saved a species
of snail, or the man that
courted a rare whooping crane for three years in an effort to get her to lay eggs — to see that sometimes, one person can
make a huge difference in ensuring the survival
of an endangered species.
The
court has a discretion as to whether repayment should be
made by a losing payee spouse; and thus for
example «to order repayment unconditionally or subject to a prohibition against enforcement against her without further leave»; but such discretion «should certainly not be equated with that
of determining the incidence
of costs at the conclusion
of an appeal».
However, in cases where a failure to give proper disclosure has
made a fair trial impossible, or prevented the
court from doing justice, or in instances
of a flagrant abuse
of process, a superior
court will exercise its inherent jurisdiction — its power to control its own procedure so as to prevent it from being used to achieve injustice — to strike out the case before or during a trial (see for
example Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others [2006] EWHC 1315 (Ch) and CPR 3.4 (5)-RRB-.
A Power
of Attorney, for
example, lets you appoint a trusted family member to
make financial and medical decisions on your behalf, while a Living Trust can help you provide for your children without the hassles
of probate
court.
Ironically lack
of such an assessment can lead to the secondary legislation being nullified by the very
courts which are under no obligation to
make such an assessment (see for
example ss 1 and 149 Equality Act 2010)
For
example, if you tripped and fell in your hotel grounds because
of a badly maintained footpath, then you could
make a holiday accident compensation claim against your UK - based travel agent through the
courts of England and Wales.
Examples of complaints about
court procedure include unfair scheduling practices, delays in decision
making, or inconsistent information on filing procedures.
If the Supreme
Court eventually rules that litigation funding is permitted in Ireland, it will mean that Irish parties who are lawfully entitled to compensation, for
example due to a breach
of contract by a large multinational corporation, or mis - selling
of financial products by an international bank, can
make use
of the financial resources and the strategic experience
of professional funders like Woodsford to get justice from the
Courts».
The
court can
make a variety
of orders, for
example, for payment
of a capital sum, transfer
of property, a pension share, and for spousal maintenance.
Another
example is a motion for summary judgment, which asks the
court to rule in the requester's favor because essential facts are no longer in dispute (perhaps because
of what has been learned in discovery),
making a jury's decision unnecessary on some — or all — points.
Reference is
made particularly to the judgment
of the Constitutional
Court no. 138/10 in the first two applicants» case, the findings
of which were reiterated in a series
of subsequent judgments in the following years (see some
examples at paragraph 45 above).
Examples include, (1) the lower
court made a serious error
of law, (2) the evidence did not support the verdict, or (3) lower
court abused its discretion in rendering a ruling.
However, the
court confirmed Kumar in
making clear that conduct falling short
of actual collusion could have the same effect, and particularly where it could be shown that the consideration being given was significantly less than the value
of the interests in property being received, the paradigm
examples being where a result is arrived at which the
court would never be expected to have
made in usual circumstances, or which it would never have approved it had known the full facts.
There is, for
example, no reason why when you go to
court you should not have a companion who takes notes
of what was said, and
makes suggestions as to what you should say.
For
example, the connections you
make may be great sources
of advice about local judges» preferences with respect to
court materials, contact information for experts, or even just basic career advice.
The most obvious
example of this is if order
made is not one that a
court could be expected, in normal circumstances, to have
made.
For
example, the ACLU
of Massachusetts, the national ACLU, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation recently filed a lawsuit in federal
court in Massachusetts on behalf
of 11 travelers whose personal electronics were searched at the border without a warrant, seeking a ruling that such searches can not be
made except pursuant to a warrant based upon probable cause.
Even in a
court not specifically created as a Gladue
court, a lawyer who is
making representations in respect
of a sentence or other disposition (for
example, an extradition proceeding) that affects the liberty
of an aboriginal person is encouraged to arrange for the preparation
of a specialized «Gladue report.»
Sam Glover: Right, so here's the
example that comes to my mind is most first - year lawyers who try to litigate in Minnesota
make the same mistake because the civil rules say that a response to a Motion for Summary Judgment is due within a certain amount
of time, and then there's this whole separate set
of rules called the general rules
of practice for District
Court, and they have a different timeline.
In other words, the suggestion to adopt a broader approach (see Amendments 6 and 39), by reflecting the Engel criteria
of the European
Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), from which the
Court of Justice has also drawn inspiration, for
example in Bonda, did not
make it into Article 2
of the Directive.
In the past, the Italian Constitutional
Court made clear that supra - national law should not prevail without any limitation, and that the application
of international obligations could not have the effect to breach the fundamental principles
of the constitutional order or the fundamental rights
of the individuals (this is called the «counter-limit doctrine», developed for
example in the «Granital case», Sentenza n. 170, 5 June 1984).
Examples of how the Washington
courts have supported attorneys who are providing unbundled services, such as offering standard forms that enable attorneys to
make limited appearances in
court
If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for
example, then the incentive for the client is to
make full - use
of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the
court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or
make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).
Masters and district judges need to
make an
example in a few high - profile cases, one
of which might perhaps reach the
Court of Appeal, which can modify practice across the board by repeating the kind
of expectations it articulated in Cowl v Plymouth City Council; Dunnett v Railtrack; Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST; and Burchell v Bullard.
For
example, in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, the
court stated that a communication can be privileged if «the subject matter upon which the attorney's advice is sought by the corporation and dealt with in the communication is the performance by the employee
of the duties
of his employment» and «the employee
makes the communication at the direction
of his superiors in the corporation.»
«Apart from considerations
of illegality, agreements to pay Form Fillers in circumstances
of unequal bargaining power and where an improvident deal was
made, such as the two
examples in the record before this
court, are unconscionable and therefore voidable at the instance
of the instance
of the claimants who entered them.»
For
example, a key part
of a lawyer's reputation is his ability to
make a statement
of fact or law, when not under oath to the
court or to another lawyer in a case, which people will consider trustworthy without having to verify it formally.
For
example, a broad comparison can be
made between the relative positions
of creditors under a CVA as opposed to a
court - managed winding up.