Sentences with phrase «court motions likely»

Chad's success can be attributed to the fact that he has limited his practice to handling appeals and trial court motions likely to be at issue on appeal.

Not exact matches

While we are pleased that the District Court found us likely to succeed on several of our claims, we are nevertheless disappointed by the court's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labelinCourt found us likely to succeed on several of our claims, we are nevertheless disappointed by the court's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labelincourt's ultimate decision to deny our Motion for Preliminary Injunction to block the implementation of the Vermont GMO labeling law

I didn't speak about it publicly at the time but, based on a motion filed by BPI in South Dakota state court, I knew a subpoena was likely on its way.

By the time the court makes a decision in his case, Haggerty will have served the bulk of his sentence, so it's likely his legal team will make a motion for his release pending that ruling — if they haven't already done so.

Finley said the coalition would likely file a motion asking the court to reconsider its ruling.

As many have forcefully opined, this decision should be reconsidered by the court (a motion to reconsider is likely).

The new trial court stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay of concern to Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rcourt stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay of concern to Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rCourt of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rcourt should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.»

Given this rule, if a lawyer in Missouri fails to conduct this search and later discovers information that may have impacted a juror's service, he is likely to find the court unsympathetic to a motion for new trial.

Having the same judge hear both motions encourages both parties to be credible in their initial temporary hearing submissions, as they are more likely to lose credibility with the court if they must appear before the same judge to whom they previously provided inaccurate information.

In the area of class actions, it is significant that a Respondent may now apply for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court granting a Motion for Authorization (Certification)(article 578), a move which will likely have an impact on strategy in first instance and Respondents» decisions whether to consent to authorization and proceed directly on the merits, or not.

See, for example, his piece on the standing issue that will likely be addressed in the court's ruling on the government's motion to dismiss the Florida lawsuit.

If either party files a Motion for Temporary Orders or requests the court set the case for trial, the court will likely schedule a Resolution Management Conference.

The court shall grant the motion if the DNA results, along with all other evidence, establishes that a new trial would likely produce an acquittal of the offense, or entitle «the applicant to a reduced sentence» or «new sentencing proceedings.»

And Judge Smith offered the strict observation that if all your objections to discovery requests are pro forma, hide the ball, non-specific objections, it is likely that the court will grant a motion to compel.

Justice Bale found that the issue was whether the proposed summary judgment motion was likely to provide a «proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result than going to trial», citing the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Hyrniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the sign was fair use and not likely to infringe LEYE's LETTUCE trademark, so it denied LEYE's motion for a temporary restraining order.

If it is likely that the opposite party will abide by the order and the parties simply need a preliminary ruling on a matter, and if a faster hearing can be obtained before the arbitral tribunal than before a court, then the motion likely should be brought to the arbitral tribunal.

Consider this: if you're an attorney, you likely spend your days responding to discovery, drafting motions and pleadings, attending depositions, and arguing in court.

If you fail to use required forms, or if you neglect to complete the forms completely and accurately, the court is likely to dismiss the motion.