Sentences with phrase «court over the outcome»

The former governor of Kaduna State was reacting to a question on whether the party would sanction the sacked National Chairman of the party, Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, and those in his camp who took the party to court over the outcome of its May 21, 2016 national convention.

Not exact matches

The composition of the Court thus was a major factor in the election's outcome, and religious voters seemed to emphasize it in debates over whether or not to support Trump.

A gay priest prevented from working as a hospital chaplain after marrying his partner will learn the outcome of an Appeal Court challenge over his claim he was discriminated against.

The outcome of the referendum could also prompt a Supreme Court challenge over whether the Constitution as a whole contains an implied fundamental right for the unborn, on top of the specific terms of the Eighth Amendment.

If you are one of over 60 per cent of people who buy certified organic food because it's been grown free of genetically modified material, rest assured the outcome of the Western Australian court case shouldn't undermine your confidence in certified organic produce.

Indeed, I am not only worried but I'm also very concerned over the setback to our electoral system, and speaking generally in the best tradition of our legal profession, not being specific on matters before any court, the implication of some of the tribunals outcome intended to shoot down the use of the card reader as some of my fellow lawyers involved in petition matters are determined to achieve is worrisome.

Democrats, meanwhile, declared victory in the race even as the court battle over the final outcome looms.

Dr Jonathan expressed reservation over the use of courts to settle purely political matters, stressing that a political solution would ensure a win - win outcome for the warring groups within the party.

The court, presided over by Ms. Patience Mills Tetteh, granted the plea for an out of court settlement and adjourned the case to December 16, for the parties to report the outcome to the court.

The court battle over one particularly close state Senate race may be over, but neither side should be happy with the outcome.

In a case that could shape the outcome of special education disputes across the country, the Supreme Court will decide in Schaffer v. Weast (Case No. 04 - 698) which side bears the burden of proof in disputes over children's individualized education programs, or IEPs.

The conventional wisdom states that she should refrain from showing her bias, especially given the recent history of the 2000 election, when the Supreme Court made the final call on the outcome in Florida, the deciding state that ushered George W. Bush into the White House over Democratic candidate Al Gore.

Ultimately, the court has prioritized institutional control over outcomes.

Indeed this is the biggest driver of the increase in spending over that period, and spending unrelated to court orders followed this policy very closely — but outcomes did not.

Following a successful claim against a fund manager, the High Court made a non-party costs order against five investors in the fund who had met the costs of the defence, had an interest in the outcome of the claim (which need not be financial), and had control over the litigation by making major decisions.

Preparation is what gives purpose to the court appearances and control over outcomes.

Courts can have jurisdiction over people who aren't parties to an arbitration agreement but who may be necessary to grant full relief or who have a stake in the outcome.

But the High Court was asked to decide on the outcome of a ten - year - old dispute between the deceased and his former son - in - law Mr Ioannis Frangos, over $ 57,617,884.70 (including interest) plus legal costs of $ 700,000.

I'm a Seattle divorce attorney, mediator, and Certified Divorce Financial Analyst ® with over 30 years of experience, skilled in helping clients with complex financial and parenting matters, and dedicated to helping clients and their families stay out of court and reach better outcomes.

It also offers parties certainty, control over the outcome, and privacy — where the parties are all capable adults, the court does not need to approve a settlement and the terms may remain private.

Resolve your divorce without going to court and subjecting yourself to countless hours of wasted time and legal fees, with little to no control over the process or the outcome.

As for the outcome at the Supreme Court of Canada, we admit that we like the Supremes in that their decisions for the most part tend to back personal liberties over state intrusion and from our perspective all of the judges seem very balanced, decent and fair.

In a concurring opinion, the second judge in the majority lamented that the «disagreement over the outcome of this relatively simple case has morphed into a debate over the propriety of appellate courts supplementing the record with Internet research.»

While the SG's office rightly assists the Court in identifying areas of the law that need clarification, I question whether the Government's attorney should have any sway over the outcome of decisions.

What makes us different is that we invite experts from all over the legal and medical fields to discuss the latest ways the law affects injury claims, and the ways medicine too can change the dynamics of these tragedies, and the potential outcomes in court.

«I do this work because I have seen firsthand how dramatically better the outcomes can be when a couple chooses mediation over the traditional court system.»

It is considered that acknowledgement of one Committee over the other will open the gates to legal challenges by the other Committee, the outcome of which may only be resolved in a court of law.

In such divorces, couples have the control over the outcome of their case without hiring attorneys and going to court.

Resolve your divorce without going to court and subjecting yourself to countless hours of wasted time and legal fees, with little to no control over the process or the outcome.

Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high value on taking personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.

In the end, with mediation, spouses have much more control over the outcome than they do in front of a family court judge.

One of the many things I have learned from my family law clients over the past 20 + years is that when they strive for an outcome (whether via agreement or court order) that provides them with everything they want, they are inevitably disappointed.

If you want to make sure that you get the car, it is usually better to settle outside of court, where you have more control over the outcome, rather than having a judge decide what's best for you and your spouse.

Collaborative Law and mediation are cost - effective process options which allow clients to retain more control over the outcomes of their cases, than traditional court process.

By choosing Collaborative divorce, instead of a potentially more costly, contentious and less private court - based approach, the couple maintains control over the divorce process and its outcomes, with the help of trained professionals, who will help guide you toward solutions tailored to your family's unique situation.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Over a 1 - year period, a four - treatment condition randomized design evaluated the outcomes for family court with usual services, drug court with usual services, drug court with Multisystemic Therapy (MST), and drug court with MST enhanced with contingency management for adolescent substance use (as measured by self - report and urine screens), criminal behavior (as measured by the Self - Report Delinquency Scale and arrest records), symptomatology (as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist), and days in out - of - home placement (as documented in criminal justice records).

Based on the concept that both spouses hire legal representation yet agree to resolve their differences without going to court, Collaborative divorce is generally less expensive and quicker than litigation, gives the couple greater control over the outcome of their divorce, and keeps children out of the controversy.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

A safe and secure mediation process will also give the victim ownership over the outcome and help keep the divorce out of court.

In litigation, the court has control over the process and the outcome.

It is considered that acknowledgement of one Committee over the other will only open the gates to legal challenges by the other Committee, the outcome of which may only be resolved in a court of law.